[Techspec] Re: RFC Author Count and IPR
Henning Schulzrinne <hgs@cs.columbia.edu> Wed, 24 May 2006 19:37 UTC
Received: from [127.0.0.1] (helo=stiedprmman1.va.neustar.com) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1FizB6-0006mV-EB; Wed, 24 May 2006 15:37:56 -0400
Received: from [10.91.34.44] (helo=ietf-mx.ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1FiyKF-0003rt-Oi; Wed, 24 May 2006 14:43:19 -0400
Received: from cs.columbia.edu ([128.59.16.20]) by ietf-mx.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1FiyKE-0007Ts-EW; Wed, 24 May 2006 14:43:19 -0400
Received: from lion.cs.columbia.edu (IDENT:V/5I5ui6pBaxCHL+Xl+Eb7vcuYPA4cyv@lion.cs.columbia.edu [128.59.16.120]) by cs.columbia.edu (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id k4OIhEX6012439 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=EDH-RSA-DES-CBC3-SHA bits=168 verify=NOT); Wed, 24 May 2006 14:43:15 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from [128.59.16.206] (chairpc.win.cs.columbia.edu [128.59.16.206]) (authenticated bits=0) by lion.cs.columbia.edu (8.12.9/8.12.9) with ESMTP id k4OIhCBB023727 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5 bits=128 verify=NOT); Wed, 24 May 2006 14:43:12 -0400
Message-ID: <4474A934.7080000@cs.columbia.edu>
Date: Wed, 24 May 2006 14:43:00 -0400
From: Henning Schulzrinne <hgs@cs.columbia.edu>
User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.2 (Windows/20060308)
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Vijay Devarapallli <dvijay@gmail.com>
References: <7.0.0.16.2.20060524115045.06eb0a80@vigilsec.com> <tslhd3fjo12.fsf@cz.mit.edu> <f1f4dcdc0605241130v77cf45adt89b0725c22d997c@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <f1f4dcdc0605241130v77cf45adt89b0725c22d997c@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-PerlMx-Spam: Gauge=IIIIIII, Probability=7%, Report='__CT 0, __CTE 0, __CT_TEXT_PLAIN 0, __HAS_MSGID 0, __MIME_TEXT_ONLY 0, __MIME_VERSION 0, __SANE_MSGID 0, __STOCK_CRUFT 0, __USER_AGENT 0'
X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/)
X-Scan-Signature: 50a516d93fd399dc60588708fd9a3002
X-Mailman-Approved-At: Wed, 24 May 2006 15:37:54 -0400
Cc: rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org, Sam Hartman <hartmans-ietf@mit.edu>, ipr-wg@ietf.org, techspec@ietf.org, ietf@ietf.org
Subject: [Techspec] Re: RFC Author Count and IPR
X-BeenThere: techspec@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Discussion list for IETF Technical Specifications \(BOF at IETF64\)" <techspec.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/techspec>, <mailto:techspec-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www1.ietf.org/pipermail/techspec>
List-Post: <mailto:techspec@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:techspec-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/techspec>, <mailto:techspec-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: techspec-bounces@ietf.org
Authorship discussions have a long history in the sciences. I'm not aware of any other scientific or technical publication that limits the number of authors. (Indeed, I have had to extend the maximum author count on a largish conference management system I run [edas.info] a few times.) The current limit of 5 seems to be motivated by formatting constraints and maybe by the notion that "vanity" publishing should be prevented. It is not clear to me that these motivations have legal standing and essentially, for practical purposes, force authors to give up their rights. In the past, I know that for some drafts, this limit has been extended when the AD made the right noises to the RFC editor, so it is not universally observed. My understanding is that "contributors" generally have inferior rights, not much different from those individuals acknowledged in the acknowledgment section of technical papers and RFCs. After some of the recent science scandals, there also seems to be a movement afoot (e.g., for Science and Nature) to force all authors to take responsibility for the paper and its content. That's a flip-side, also from an IPR perspective: If somebody can plausibly claim that they just got added to the author list without their consent, they could weasle out of the IPR disclosure rules. At least from my experience, it is not uncommon that I-D authors add others as a courtesy and, currently, nobody seems to check whether these authors consented to being an author... Henning Vijay Devarapallli wrote: > On 5/24/06, Sam Hartman <hartmans-ietf@mit.edu> wrote: > >> That means if you have unlisted authors who have contributed >> significant chunks of text, you still need to get their clearance to >> do anything interesting with that text. > > typically the unlisted authors are ignored. > > also during the AUTH48 period, the RFC Editor contacts only the listed > authors. > > Vijay > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > > _______________________________________________ > Ietf mailing list > Ietf@ietf.org > https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf _______________________________________________ Techspec mailing list Techspec@ietf.org https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/techspec
- [Techspec] Re: RFC Author Count and IPR JFC (Jefsey) Morfin
- [Techspec] Re: RFC Author Count and IPR Masataka Ohta
- [Techspec] RFC Author Count and IPR Russ Housley
- [Techspec] Re: RFC Author Count and IPR Sam Hartman
- [Techspec] Re: RFC Author Count and IPR Russ Housley
- [Techspec] Re: RFC Author Count and IPR Sam Hartman
- [Techspec] Re: RFC Author Count and IPR Bob Braden
- [Techspec] Re: RFC Author Count and IPR Russ Housley
- Re: [Techspec] RFC Author Count and IPR Bob Braden
- [Techspec] Re: RFC Author Count and IPR Sam Hartman
- [Techspec] Re: RFC Author Count and IPR Sam Hartman
- [Techspec] Re: RFC Author Count and IPR Bob Braden
- [Techspec] Re: RFC Author Count and IPR Vijay Devarapallli
- [Techspec] RE: RFC Author Count and IPR David Harrington
- [Techspec] Re: RFC Author Count and IPR Ken Raeburn
- [Techspec] Re: RFC Author Count and IPR Henning Schulzrinne
- [Techspec] Re: RFC Author Count and IPR Vijay Devarapallli
- [Techspec] RE: RFC Author Count and IPR Gray, Eric
- [Techspec] RE: RFC Author Count and IPR Gray, Eric
- [Techspec] Re: RFC Author Count and IPR Andy Bierman
- Re: [Techspec] RFC Author Count and IPR Lucy E. Lynch
- Re: [Techspec] RFC Author Count and IPR Bob Braden
- Re: [Techspec] RFC Author Count and IPR Bob Braden
- Re: [Techspec] RFC Author Count and IPR Lucy E. Lynch
- Re: [Techspec] RFC Author Count and IPR Bob Braden
- Re: [Techspec] RFC Author Count and IPR Lucy E. Lynch
- Re: [Techspec] RFC Author Count and IPR Bob Braden
- Re: [Techspec] RFC Author Count and IPR Lucy E. Lynch
- [Techspec] Tracking IPR (Re: RFC Author Count and… Harald Alvestrand
- Re: [Techspec] RFC Author Count and IPR Harald Alvestrand
- Re: [Techspec] RFC Author Count and IPR Harald Alvestrand
- [Techspec] Re: RFC Author Count and IPR John Loughney
- Re: [Techspec] RFC Author Count and IPR Lucy E. Lynch
- Re: [Techspec] RFC Author Count and IPR Lucy E. Lynch
- Re: [Techspec] RFC Author Count and IPR Bob Braden
- Re: [Techspec] RFC Author Count and IPR todd glassey
- Re: [Techspec] RFC Author Count and IPR bmanning
- Re: [Techspec] RFC Author Count and IPR todd glassey
- [Techspec] Re: RFC Author Count and IPR Bill Fenner
- [Techspec] Re: RFC Author Count and IPR Dave Crocker
- [Techspec] Re: RFC Author Count and IPR Jeffrey Hutzelman