[Techspec] Re: RFC Author Count and IPR

Russ Housley <housley@vigilsec.com> Wed, 24 May 2006 18:51 UTC

Received: from [127.0.0.1] (helo=stiedprmman1.va.neustar.com) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1FiyRk-00086o-Tu; Wed, 24 May 2006 14:51:04 -0400
Received: from [10.91.34.44] (helo=ietf-mx.ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1FiyRj-00086j-LN for techspec@ietf.org; Wed, 24 May 2006 14:51:03 -0400
Received: from woodstock.binhost.com ([144.202.243.4]) by ietf-mx.ietf.org with smtp (Exim 4.43) id 1FiyRi-0007ww-Dy for techspec@ietf.org; Wed, 24 May 2006 14:51:03 -0400
Received: (qmail 3538 invoked by uid 0); 24 May 2006 18:44:14 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO THINKPADR52.vigilsec.com) (71.126.181.72) by woodstock.binhost.com with SMTP; 24 May 2006 18:44:14 -0000
Message-Id: <7.0.0.16.2.20060524144104.05718a70@vigilsec.com>
X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 7.0.0.16
Date: Wed, 24 May 2006 14:42:00 -0400
To: Sam Hartman <hartmans-ietf@mit.edu>
From: Russ Housley <housley@vigilsec.com>
In-Reply-To: <tslslmzi83i.fsf@cz.mit.edu>
References: <7.0.0.16.2.20060524115045.06eb0a80@vigilsec.com> <tslhd3fjo12.fsf@cz.mit.edu> <7.0.0.16.2.20060524142029.06ef7e40@vigilsec.com> <tslslmzi83i.fsf@cz.mit.edu>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format="flowed"
X-Spam-Score: 0.1 (/)
X-Scan-Signature: 9182cfff02fae4f1b6e9349e01d62f32
Cc: rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org, ietf@ietf.org, techspec@ietf.org, ipr-wg@ietf.org
Subject: [Techspec] Re: RFC Author Count and IPR
X-BeenThere: techspec@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Discussion list for IETF Technical Specifications \(BOF at IETF64\)" <techspec.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/techspec>, <mailto:techspec-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www1.ietf.org/pipermail/techspec>
List-Post: <mailto:techspec@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:techspec-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/techspec>, <mailto:techspec-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: techspec-bounces@ietf.org

Sam:

If the people with copyright interest are the combination of the 
authors plus the contributors, then we need to specify this in a BCP.

Does the RFC Editor have to contact the members of both lists during 
Auth48?  If so, I would suggest that the RFf Editor only needs a 
positive reply from the authors, but that the contributors only need 
to respond if they discover a change that is needed.

Russ

At 02:35 PM 5/24/2006, Sam Hartman wrote:
> >>>>> "Russ" == Russ Housley <housley@vigilsec.com> writes:
>
>     Russ> Sam: We need a way to track the people that have copyright
>     Russ> interest.  I had always assumed this was the author list.
>     Russ> If we are going to continue to limit the author count to
>     Russ> five people, then there needs to be a place where the people
>     Russ> with copyright interest are listed in the document.  This is
>     Russ> the reason that I included the techspec mail list on my
>     Russ> posting.
>
>I think that's probably authors?+contributors.


_______________________________________________
Techspec mailing list
Techspec@ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/techspec