IETF Logo Mail Archive

[Techspec] Re: RFC Author Count and IPR

Jeffrey Hutzelman <jhutz@cmu.edu> Mon, 05 June 2006 18:20 UTC

Received: from [127.0.0.1] (helo=stiedprmman1.va.neustar.com) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1FnJgd-0000HB-DT; Mon, 05 Jun 2006 14:20:23 -0400
Received: from [10.91.34.44] (helo=ietf-mx.ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1FnJX6-0004HI-2x; Mon, 05 Jun 2006 14:10:32 -0400
Received: from chokecherry.srv.cs.cmu.edu ([128.2.185.41]) by ietf-mx.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1FnJX4-0004vy-T1; Mon, 05 Jun 2006 14:10:32 -0400
Received: from sirius.fac.cs.cmu.edu (SIRIUS.FAC.CS.CMU.EDU [128.2.209.170]) (authenticated bits=0) by chokecherry.srv.cs.cmu.edu (8.13.6/8.13.6) with ESMTP id k55IAMJE007827 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Mon, 5 Jun 2006 14:10:23 -0400 (EDT)
Date: Mon, 05 Jun 2006 14:10:22 -0400
From: Jeffrey Hutzelman <jhutz@cmu.edu>
To: Dave Crocker <dhc2@dcrocker.net>, ietf@ietf.org
Message-ID: <4EDCDA8FAF2CAA4C961CC08B@sirius.fac.cs.cmu.edu>
In-Reply-To: <448458D2.5010702@dcrocker.net>
References: <7.0.0.16.2.20060524115045.06eb0a80@vigilsec.com> <tslhd3fjo12.fsf@cz.mit.edu> <7.0.0.16.2.20060524142029.06ef7e40@vigilsec.com> <tslslmzi83i.fsf@cz.mit.edu> <7.0.0.16.2.20060524144104.05718a70@vigilsec.com> <448458D2.5010702@dcrocker.net>
Originator-Info: login-token=Mulberry:01oEe0bwqvKePskizw08Xk3je565oney0NvOLU1sc=; token_authority=postmaster@andrew.cmu.edu
X-Mailer: Mulberry/3.1.6 (Linux/x86)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline
X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/)
X-Scan-Signature: 7a6398bf8aaeabc7a7bb696b6b0a2aad
X-Mailman-Approved-At: Mon, 05 Jun 2006 14:20:23 -0400
Cc: Jeffrey Hutzelman <jhutz@cmu.edu>, ipr-wg@ietf.org, techspec@ietf.org, rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org
Subject: [Techspec] Re: RFC Author Count and IPR
X-BeenThere: techspec@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Discussion list for IETF Technical Specifications \(BOF at IETF64\)" <techspec.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/techspec>, <mailto:techspec-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www1.ietf.org/pipermail/techspec>
List-Post: <mailto:techspec@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:techspec-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/techspec>, <mailto:techspec-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: techspec-bounces@ietf.org


On Monday, June 05, 2006 09:16:18 AM -0700 Dave Crocker <dhc2@dcrocker.net> 
wrote:


> Wouldn't it make more sense for the rules concerning author list to be
> dictated by the combination of the needs to state primary resonsibility,
> ie, those writing the docs,  and logistics/processing needs of those
> publishing it?

I certainly think it would.


_______________________________________________
Techspec mailing list
Techspec@ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/techspec

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email