Re: [Techspec] RFC Author Count and IPR

"Lucy E. Lynch" <llynch@darkwing.uoregon.edu> Wed, 24 May 2006 21:14 UTC

Received: from [127.0.0.1] (helo=stiedprmman1.va.neustar.com) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Fj0gb-0001gD-Ro; Wed, 24 May 2006 17:14:33 -0400
Received: from [10.91.34.44] (helo=ietf-mx.ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Fj0ga-0001fz-Mm; Wed, 24 May 2006 17:14:32 -0400
Received: from mserv2.uoregon.edu ([128.223.142.41] helo=smtp.uoregon.edu) by ietf-mx.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Fj0gZ-0001DL-Aa; Wed, 24 May 2006 17:14:32 -0400
Received: from geoduck.uoregon.edu (geoduck.uoregon.edu [128.223.142.113]) by smtp.uoregon.edu (8.13.6/8.13.6) with ESMTP id k4OLEMml030283 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NOT); Wed, 24 May 2006 14:14:22 -0700
Date: Wed, 24 May 2006 14:14:22 -0700
From: "Lucy E. Lynch" <llynch@darkwing.uoregon.edu>
X-X-Sender: llynch@geoduck.uoregon.edu
To: Bob Braden <braden@ISI.EDU>
Subject: Re: [Techspec] RFC Author Count and IPR
In-Reply-To: <200605242059.NAA14811@gra.isi.edu>
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.64.0605241401130.29244@geoduck.uoregon.edu>
References: <200605242059.NAA14811@gra.isi.edu>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset="US-ASCII"; format="flowed"
X-Virus-Scanned: ClamAV 0.88.2/1480/Wed May 24 09:45:51 2006 on mserv2
X-Virus-Status: Clean
X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/)
X-Scan-Signature: cab78e1e39c4b328567edb48482b6a69
Cc: rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org, ietf@ietf.org, techspec@ietf.org, ipr-wg@ietf.org
X-BeenThere: techspec@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Discussion list for IETF Technical Specifications \(BOF at IETF64\)" <techspec.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/techspec>, <mailto:techspec-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www1.ietf.org/pipermail/techspec>
List-Post: <mailto:techspec@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:techspec-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/techspec>, <mailto:techspec-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: techspec-bounces@ietf.org

On Wed, 24 May 2006, Bob Braden wrote:

>
>
>  *>
>  *> Bob -
>  *>
>  *> Following Jari's link to the document (ID) with 20 authors I found:
>  *>
>  *> http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-ietf-pwe3-dynamic-ms-pw-00.txt
>  *>
>  *> which lists 3 editors on the front page and includes a section (17)
>  *> titled "Author Information" which includes 20 addresses.
>
> Lucy,
>
> You are suggesting that the definition of "author" is determined by some
> tool that produces the pretty graph.  I don't think so.  In all
> documentation related to the RFC Editor, an author is a person listed
> on the first page.  I cannot explain what was in the mind of the
> person writing the tool.

Bob -

This is exactly the question I'm trying to get clarity on. Russ's
initial email implied that there may be a submerged IPR issue if
we limit the number of authors listed on the front page AND hold that
document "authors" continue to hold IP rights. I don't know enough
about the history of IP ownership vs acknowledged authorship to be
able to tell how serious an issue this may be.

Let me try re-stating my question. Is there a one-to-one relationship 
between the listed authors on an IETF document and ownership of the
given document's Intellectual Property?

- lel


> Bob Braden
>

-- 
Lucy E. Lynch 				Academic User Services
Computing Center			University of Oregon
llynch  @darkwing.uoregon.edu		(541) 346-1774

_______________________________________________
Techspec mailing list
Techspec@ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/techspec