Re: [Teep] Charter Text

Kaarthik Sivakumar <kaarthik.sk@gmail.com> Thu, 20 July 2017 09:53 UTC

Return-Path: <kaarthik.sk@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: teep@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: teep@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 44AD212009C for <teep@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 20 Jul 2017 02:53:44 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.276
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.276 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, MIME_HTML_ONLY=0.723, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id j4WMFI8boT8s for <teep@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 20 Jul 2017 02:53:43 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-wr0-x22d.google.com (mail-wr0-x22d.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:400c:c0c::22d]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7B14E131A81 for <teep@ietf.org>; Thu, 20 Jul 2017 02:53:42 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-wr0-x22d.google.com with SMTP id k71so15040776wrc.2 for <teep@ietf.org>; Thu, 20 Jul 2017 02:53:42 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=subject:to:references:from:message-id:date:user-agent:mime-version :in-reply-to:content-language:content-transfer-encoding; bh=Y5Izy9TD64SzOLkr2NZ+oMIsHosGI6SGwdF9694MhGk=; b=T6VL9OWLxv70XAtMUmJNNdcQFLpcdEqGuExTKHLarLSE/8rGb6bqQSTznxTIyfpT7U F6u/ESwttXCGuRYo0o3DG/MNPlp3onvAUngtk+IQZtMFpYTnCad8TFC5M0SHsXNyP+Fg x6CWEIwMRYEkCWTQFLO135PGHH4hDdaU6hzcxAuVRIYa26T3cA0GB+7ace+N3alPY4hN VFs2hBKCcUg6E3fNUqFc8YH2zB3Bglobe8T5xYqE0H1mShn2ZgyUFUrNNIIM8+iyBCqH 5oOTLcZjLDSweXjVloeFyXfgSMLbPvtiMFPp/SbuM8vX5iaYENtyZKNYtJ11SbDZqL16 i4YA==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:subject:to:references:from:message-id:date :user-agent:mime-version:in-reply-to:content-language :content-transfer-encoding; bh=Y5Izy9TD64SzOLkr2NZ+oMIsHosGI6SGwdF9694MhGk=; b=ttX8kjZlLnCSd7rrj61dAHwqh8oKSijp8+fXq9S6nkVWKaRLTZdiKVJrA9t2wyId+Z 64Kb75PL19VkiuBDx0bH/ifK1ITNo/DTh/uhDofuhtkTlONFZpuWONFD8lyM18FBv3hJ wEl1krv5s+m/1sJABH/1DYE/FeewVfQPlb6xcwnHGRxApc66uV5TJc6UBlRvPurBeVVQ fZXVGdjcl2WIvzfmzM2/ZybF9+ADwoWnGEGgCBw67kf6fc/HyS+QEqOkE1UUKcRhWXp9 Sg26SlutZqSzG/XUlwX27GrlA1RpAoNn5f1CmwnFhBN69Yf33yDNaDGnbMN0YjAHm8mN 6dSw==
X-Gm-Message-State: AIVw1102j9p4Eg7HU6UZLv4oUyKh+B6D9Z3sW7jkanMQZd3yzRZyz6HY UaodhbslVWXQwBUPr5o=
X-Received: by 10.223.174.199 with SMTP id y65mr2064902wrc.182.1500544420740; Thu, 20 Jul 2017 02:53:40 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ?IPv6:2001:420:c0c0:1007::194? ([2001:420:c0c0:1007::194]) by smtp.googlemail.com with ESMTPSA id s2sm1973994wra.71.2017.07.20.02.53.39 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Thu, 20 Jul 2017 02:53:40 -0700 (PDT)
To: "Nancy Cam-Winget (ncamwing)" <ncamwing@cisco.com>, "teep@ietf.org" <teep@ietf.org>
References: <6EFD27BC-CE56-4112-AD20-C787520BEE87@cisco.com>
From: Kaarthik Sivakumar <kaarthik.sk@gmail.com>
Message-ID: <ec4426b9-3fdb-d58e-3c63-48db552dca69@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 20 Jul 2017 11:53:38 +0200
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.12; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/52.1.1
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <6EFD27BC-CE56-4112-AD20-C787520BEE87@cisco.com>
Content-Type: text/html; charset="utf-8"
Content-Language: en-US
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/teep/gYJktPy1hQX22yHtlm5gkLmOcro>
Subject: Re: [Teep] Charter Text
X-BeenThere: teep@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: A Protocol for Dynamic Trusted Execution Environment Enablement <teep.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/teep>, <mailto:teep-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/teep/>
List-Post: <mailto:teep@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:teep-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/teep>, <mailto:teep-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 20 Jul 2017 09:53:44 -0000

One question. I was at the TEEP meeting yesterday and saw a (version of the) picture that showed TEE and TAM on the same hardware. The picture was later modified with a vertical bar between the TAM and TEE, but are they still expected to be in the same hardware device? Is that picture available somewhere?

I guess my answer to your first question is "not completely".


-kaarthik-

On 20/07/17 11:13 AM, Nancy Cam-Winget (ncamwing) wrote:

All,

Please provide feedback on the results of yesterday’s side meeting.  In particular, we’d like to get feedback on whether this the right scope and if we have captured it appropriately. If it is not, also please comment and if possible, provide suggestions for improvement.

 

We would like to continue discussion over email and get consensus around the 2nd week of September so that we can have a path forward.  In particular we would like to get answers for:

 

1) Do you understand what TEEP is trying to achieve?

2) Is this work that should be done in general?

3) Is this work that should be done in the IETF, or does it belong to somewhere else?

4) Should we form a WG with given charter to work on this?

 

Warm regards,

    Nancy & Tero (TEEP BoF Chairs)

 

From: TEEP <teep-bounces@ietf.org> on behalf of Hannes Tschofenig <Hannes.Tschofenig@arm.com>
Date: Wednesday, July 19, 2017 at 5:56 AM
To: "teep@ietf.org" <teep@ietf.org>
Subject: [Teep] Charter Text

 

Here is the charter text we came up in the side-meeting today.

 

------



TEEP -- A Protocol for Dynamic Trusted Execution Environment Enablement Charter

 

The Trusted Execution Environment (TEE) is a secure area of a processor. The TEE provides security features, such as isolated execution, integrity of Trusted Applications along with confidentiality of their assets. In general terms, the TEE offers an execution space that provides a higher level of security than a "rich" operating system and more functionality than a secure element. For example, implementations of the TEE concept have been developed by ARM, and Intel using the TrustZone and the SGX technology, respectively.

 

To programmatically install, update, and delete applications running in the TEE, this protocol runs between a service running within the TEE, a relay application or service access point on the device's network stack and a server-side infrastructure that interacts with and optionally maintains the applications. Some tasks are security sensitive and the server side requires information about the device characteristics in form of attestation and the device-side may require information about the server.

 

Privacy considerations have to be taken into account with authentication features and attestation.

 

This working group aims to develop an application layer protocol providing TEEs with the following functionality,

* lifecycle management of trusted applications, and

* security domain management.

 

A security domain allows a service provider's applications to be isolated so that one security domain cannot be influenced by another, unless it exposes an API to allow it.

 

The solution approach must take a wide range of TEE and relevant technologies into account and will focus on the use of public key cryptography.

 

The group will produce the following deliverables. First, an architecture document describing the involved entities, their relationships, assumptions, the keying framework and relevant use cases. Second, a solution document that describes the above-described functionality. The choice of encoding format(s) will be decided in the working group. The group may document several attestation technologies considering the different hardware capabilities, performance, privacy and operational properties.

 

The group will maintain a close relationship with the GlobalPlatform, Trusted Computing Group,  and other relevant standards to ensure proper use of existing TEE-relevant application layer interfaces.

 

Milestones

 

Dec 2017     Submit "TEEP Architecture" document as WG item.

 

Feb 2018     Submit "TEEP Protocol" document as WG item.

 

July 2018     Submit "TEEP Architecture" to the IESG for publication as an Informational RFC.

 

Feb 2019     Submit "TEEP Protocol" to the IESG for publication as a Proposed Standard.

 

Additional calendar items:

 

Nov 2017     IETF #100 Hackathon to work on TEEP protocol prototype implementations.

 

Mar 2018     1st interoperability event (at IETF #101).

 

Jul 2018       2nd interoperability event (at IETF #102).

 

IMPORTANT NOTICE: The contents of this email and any attachments are confidential and may also be privileged. If you are not the intended recipient, please notify the sender immediately and do not disclose the contents to any other person, use it for any purpose, or store or copy the information in any medium. Thank you.



_______________________________________________
TEEP mailing list
TEEP@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/teep" rel="nofollow">https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/teep