IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Teep] My BoF impression

Michael Richardson <mcr+ietf@sandelman.ca> Mon, 03 April 2017 14:59 UTC

Return-Path: <mcr+ietf@sandelman.ca>
X-Original-To: teep@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: teep@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 12948128896 for <teep@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 3 Apr 2017 07:59:18 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.902
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.902 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id ddOnmfsNWNAk for <teep@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 3 Apr 2017 07:59:16 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from tuna.sandelman.ca (tuna.sandelman.ca [IPv6:2607:f0b0:f:3:216:3eff:fe7c:d1f3]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1D4BF1200C1 for <teep@ietf.org>; Mon, 3 Apr 2017 07:59:16 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from sandelman.ca (obiwan.sandelman.ca [209.87.249.21]) by tuna.sandelman.ca (Postfix) with ESMTP id DF5432009E; Mon, 3 Apr 2017 11:23:26 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from obiwan.sandelman.ca (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by sandelman.ca (Postfix) with ESMTP id CAEE5636BB; Mon, 3 Apr 2017 10:59:14 -0400 (EDT)
From: Michael Richardson <mcr+ietf@sandelman.ca>
To: Hannes Tschofenig <Hannes.Tschofenig@arm.com>
cc: teep <teep@ietf.org>
In-Reply-To: <HE1PR0802MB2475515770704882F9CFBDBCFA080@HE1PR0802MB2475.eurprd08.prod.outlook.com>
References: <HE1PR0802MB2475515770704882F9CFBDBCFA080@HE1PR0802MB2475.eurprd08.prod.outlook.com>
X-Mailer: MH-E 8.6; nmh 1.6+dev; GNU Emacs 24.5.1
X-Face: $\n1pF)h^`}$H>Hk{L"x@)JS7<%Az}5RyS@k9X%29-lHB$Ti.V>2bi.~ehC0; <'$9xN5Ub# z!G,p`nR&p7Fz@^UXIn156S8.~^@MJ*mMsD7=QFeq%AL4m<nPbLgmtKK-5dC@#:k
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-="; micalg="pgp-sha256"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"
Date: Mon, 03 Apr 2017 10:59:14 -0400
Message-ID: <28987.1491231554@obiwan.sandelman.ca>
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/teep/hhW4ukLTGPCfVF-pyoY8lthrOsc>
Subject: Re: [Teep] My BoF impression
X-BeenThere: teep@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: A Protocol for Dynamic Trusted Execution Environment Enablement <teep.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/teep>, <mailto:teep-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/teep/>
List-Post: <mailto:teep@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:teep-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/teep>, <mailto:teep-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 03 Apr 2017 14:59:18 -0000

Hannes Tschofenig <Hannes.Tschofenig@arm.com> wrote:
    > Going fast forward to the end of the meeting, the chairs asked two
    > questions:

    > Q1: “Does the group understand the work to be done?”

    > A: More people hummed yes than no but it was only by a bit. Not
    > convincing.

    > Q2: How many people are interested in working on this?

    > A: About 14-15 people.

I think that the question:
        Why do this work at the IETF?

was not sufficiently answered.  There are many possible answers.

I note that after TRILL and some other things, the answer "because the IETF
has the right clue" seems to be an acceptable answer to the above question.


--
Michael Richardson <mcr+IETF@sandelman.ca>, Sandelman Software Works
 -= IPv6 IoT consulting =-

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email