[Teep] My BoF impression

Hannes Tschofenig <Hannes.Tschofenig@arm.com> Mon, 03 April 2017 13:39 UTC

Return-Path: <Hannes.Tschofenig@arm.com>
X-Original-To: teep@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: teep@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 179FA1295EA for <teep@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 3 Apr 2017 06:39:58 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.921
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.921 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H4=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=armh.onmicrosoft.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id zaW8H-2iJYJR for <teep@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 3 Apr 2017 06:39:56 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from EUR01-HE1-obe.outbound.protection.outlook.com (mail-he1eur01on0063.outbound.protection.outlook.com [104.47.0.63]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7F2251287A7 for <teep@ietf.org>; Mon, 3 Apr 2017 06:39:55 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=armh.onmicrosoft.com; s=selector1-arm-com; h=From:Date:Subject:Message-ID:Content-Type:MIME-Version; bh=6kjM+y+d5oqiPyJr/bKVA8XWLL8RVgEOy46WTmogeqY=; b=aOPULYnSDeMjjO538NLiFPROTEzZfcjYIyZ+imRxk9/XfYxpRLkMuFxDyrORh6LTp+4Q4+vgiujw7DHKhG7KSHjwVWw+T+9YmF0oJ2x5woVsB/j6m45sgbAdQTFa4niMS5LBCVl3eASSzLJa5Q64y4uAnt3lkqYD4xmwLJjmzrw=
Received: from HE1PR0802MB2475.eurprd08.prod.outlook.com (10.175.34.148) by HE1PR0802MB2475.eurprd08.prod.outlook.com (10.175.34.148) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_CBC_SHA256_P256) id 15.1.1005.10; Mon, 3 Apr 2017 13:39:53 +0000
Received: from HE1PR0802MB2475.eurprd08.prod.outlook.com ([10.175.34.148]) by HE1PR0802MB2475.eurprd08.prod.outlook.com ([10.175.34.148]) with mapi id 15.01.1005.017; Mon, 3 Apr 2017 13:39:53 +0000
From: Hannes Tschofenig <Hannes.Tschofenig@arm.com>
To: teep <teep@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: My BoF impression
Thread-Index: AdKsfR5pN/u1b+bUScqch7DKLecY3Q==
Date: Mon, 03 Apr 2017 13:39:52 +0000
Message-ID: <HE1PR0802MB2475515770704882F9CFBDBCFA080@HE1PR0802MB2475.eurprd08.prod.outlook.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
authentication-results: ietf.org; dkim=none (message not signed) header.d=none;ietf.org; dmarc=none action=none header.from=arm.com;
x-originating-ip: [80.92.121.218]
x-microsoft-exchange-diagnostics: 1; HE1PR0802MB2475; 7:rp5XGLyc+EmdNR/KsywM7VFabY9JWs1D9b/C0JGTbUqBlppoScS7ykcMbJ83wXhYFG46aQlxFUn7xoXkieXzpkxfxmU5Wi+l7IcqbwwN7MnmD3vxHINN+ZLIaXvjadtvXqRVoHCDK9JZWivoEWDp9xnARK1NddcAgHT+11/h/KnotTBeTTCQ+vSALw7JXg7VRTHv9Idz/6tQoZR6KcicNZT6cD8gCtgQaa0uCyV2eUuqrYycmsJKROBon8zIa/J4GByI3Xm6aP7IwPgFcOcjnazwQr6EudiXzg8yPIoj3vn1nd/CWZOohz7RjUD1ryfVV/u6cpjV9j7a6rXI2vyEkw==
x-ms-office365-filtering-correlation-id: 25814075-b18c-4cb4-25f7-08d47a96e87a
x-ms-office365-filtering-ht: Tenant
x-microsoft-antispam: UriScan:; BCL:0; PCL:0; RULEID:(22001)(2017030254075)(48565401081)(201703131423075)(201703031133081)(201702281549075); SRVR:HE1PR0802MB2475;
x-microsoft-antispam-prvs: <HE1PR0802MB2475C19C907322DFE2574552FA080@HE1PR0802MB2475.eurprd08.prod.outlook.com>
x-exchange-antispam-report-test: UriScan:(192374486261705)(21748063052155);
x-exchange-antispam-report-cfa-test: BCL:0; PCL:0; RULEID:(6040450)(601004)(2401047)(8121501046)(5005006)(3002001)(10201501046)(93006095)(93001095)(6055026)(6041248)(20161123562025)(20161123560025)(201703131423075)(201702281528075)(201703061421075)(20161123555025)(20161123564025)(6072148); SRVR:HE1PR0802MB2475; BCL:0; PCL:0; RULEID:; SRVR:HE1PR0802MB2475;
x-forefront-prvs: 0266491E90
x-forefront-antispam-report: SFV:NSPM; SFS:(10009020)(6009001)(39400400002)(39410400002)(39450400003)(39850400002)(39860400002)(39840400002)(53754006)(40434004)(2900100001)(9686003)(5660300001)(6306002)(54896002)(7116003)(554214002)(53936002)(8936002)(25786009)(6506006)(790700001)(6116002)(77096006)(81166006)(8676002)(3480700004)(7736002)(102836003)(86362001)(3846002)(55016002)(74316002)(99286003)(38730400002)(2906002)(54356999)(50986999)(110136004)(66066001)(5890100001)(33656002)(189998001)(7696004)(122556002)(6916009); DIR:OUT; SFP:1101; SCL:1; SRVR:HE1PR0802MB2475; H:HE1PR0802MB2475.eurprd08.prod.outlook.com; FPR:; SPF:None; MLV:sfv; LANG:en;
spamdiagnosticoutput: 1:99
spamdiagnosticmetadata: NSPM
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_HE1PR0802MB2475515770704882F9CFBDBCFA080HE1PR0802MB2475_"
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-OriginatorOrg: arm.com
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-originalarrivaltime: 03 Apr 2017 13:39:52.7442 (UTC)
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-fromentityheader: Hosted
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-id: f34e5979-57d9-4aaa-ad4d-b122a662184d
X-MS-Exchange-Transport-CrossTenantHeadersStamped: HE1PR0802MB2475
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/teep/njvurU9S856REmqFgz8Cw5O9mH0>
Subject: [Teep] My BoF impression
X-BeenThere: teep@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: A Protocol for Dynamic Trusted Execution Environment Enablement <teep.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/teep>, <mailto:teep-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/teep/>
List-Post: <mailto:teep@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:teep-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/teep>, <mailto:teep-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 03 Apr 2017 13:39:58 -0000

Hi all,

we started the meeting with a somewhat surprisingly large audience. Given the narrow focus on a protocol for managing software on Trusted Execution Environments (TEEs) I expected fewer people to show up. Instead, the room was full and it was one of the largest.

As I had expected the initial presentations providing background about TEEs was useful. I doubt that most attendees have had a chance to read through the material shared on the mailing list. After the meeting a few folks approached me and told me that they had learned new concepts during the BoF, which is good.

Following the presentations we had a couple of questions, which I believe, deserve further discussion on the list.

Going fast forward to the end of the meeting, the chairs asked two questions:

Q1: "Does the group understand the work to be done?"
A: More people hummed yes than no but it was only by a bit.  Not convincing.

Q2: How many people are interested in working on this?
A: About 14-15 people.

Sitting in the plane going back to Austria I was wondering whether we should have asked further questions to those who said "no". I am curious what aspect they didn't understood or whether this group included also those who weren't interested to do the work or, like PHB, wanted a different hardware security solution to begin with.

In any case, we will have to figure out what the next steps are and I am looking forward to chat with those who are interested to work on this topic. Please drop me a message if you care about turning TEEs into a more successful technology.

Ciao
Hannes

IMPORTANT NOTICE: The contents of this email and any attachments are confidential and may also be privileged. If you are not the intended recipient, please notify the sender immediately and do not disclose the contents to any other person, use it for any purpose, or store or copy the information in any medium. Thank you.