Re: [Teep] My BoF impression

Hello,

Thanks for your summary to the list, Hannes.  The helpful feedback I
received should provide guidance for those interested to get ready for
the next BoF.

The concrete work items were discussed on list, but not in the room.
These need to be made clear so that attendees understand the type and
scope of work.  Understanding the protocols and data models that exist
and what gaps remain would have been helpful.  Is there anything
unique about the protocols needed (managing trust applications, etc.).

Thank you,
Kathleen

On Mon, Apr 3, 2017 at 10:59 AM, Michael Richardson
<mcr+ietf@sandelman.ca> wrote:
>
> Hannes Tschofenig <Hannes.Tschofenig@arm.com> wrote:
>     > Going fast forward to the end of the meeting, the chairs asked two
>     > questions:
>
>     > Q1: “Does the group understand the work to be done?”
>
>     > A: More people hummed yes than no but it was only by a bit. Not
>     > convincing.
>
>     > Q2: How many people are interested in working on this?
>
>     > A: About 14-15 people.
>
> I think that the question:
>         Why do this work at the IETF?
>
> was not sufficiently answered.  There are many possible answers.
>
> I note that after TRILL and some other things, the answer "because the IETF
> has the right clue" seems to be an acceptable answer to the above question.
>
>
> --
> Michael Richardson <mcr+IETF@sandelman.ca>, Sandelman Software Works
>  -= IPv6 IoT consulting =-
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> TEEP mailing list
> TEEP@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/teep
>

-- 

Best regards,
Kathleen