Re: Reserved types needed for Environment option
minshall@wc.novell.com Mon, 12 April 1993 15:40 UTC
Received: from ietf.nri.reston.va.us by IETF.CNRI.Reston.VA.US id aa16566; 12 Apr 93 11:40 EDT
Received: from CNRI.RESTON.VA.US by IETF.CNRI.Reston.VA.US id aa16562; 12 Apr 93 11:40 EDT
Received: from timbuk.cray.com by CNRI.Reston.VA.US id aa19307; 12 Apr 93 11:40 EDT
Received: from hemlock.cray.com by cray.com (4.1/CRI-MX 2.17) id AA04656; Mon, 12 Apr 93 10:40:45 CDT
Received: by hemlock.cray.com id AA03737; 4.1/CRI-5.6; Mon, 12 Apr 93 10:40:38 CDT
Received: from cray.com (timbuk.cray.com) by hemlock.cray.com id AA03731; 4.1/CRI-5.6; Mon, 12 Apr 93 10:40:28 CDT
Received: from wc.novell.com (optics.wc.novell.com) by cray.com (4.1/CRI-MX 2.17) id AA04603; Mon, 12 Apr 93 10:40:26 CDT
Received: from by wc.novell.com (4.1/smi4.1.1.v91190) id AB08389; Mon, 12 Apr 93 08:39:58 PDT
Date: Mon, 12 Apr 1993 08:39:58 -0700
Message-Id: <9304121539.AB08389@wc.novell.com>
To: "David A. Borman" <dab@berserkly.cray.com>
Sender: ietf-archive-request@IETF.CNRI.Reston.VA.US
From: minshall@wc.novell.com
X-Sender: minshall@optics.wc.novell.com
Subject: Re: Reserved types needed for Environment option
Cc: telnet-ietf@cray.com
Dave, I think this is the wrong way to do it. I think that if a new sub-option or set of sub-options is needed, then you should negotiate a new telnet option to indicate the ability of the receiver to parse those new sub-options. Greg
- Reserved types needed for Environment option David A. Borman
- Re: Reserved types needed for Environment option minshall