IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [TICTOC] WGLC on draft-ietf-tictoc-ptp-mib-05.txt

Kevin Gross <kevin.gross@avanw.com> Thu, 16 May 2013 17:09 UTC

Return-Path: <kevin.gross@avanw.com>
X-Original-To: tictoc@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: tictoc@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A9C7011E810E for <tictoc@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 16 May 2013 10:09:05 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: 1.852
X-Spam-Level: *
X-Spam-Status: No, score=1.852 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, FH_RELAY_NODNS=1.451, FM_FORGED_GMAIL=0.622, HELO_MISMATCH_NET=0.611, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RDNS_NONE=0.1, SARE_HTML_USL_OBFU=1.666]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id v7-YYZSoFTlh for <tictoc@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 16 May 2013 10:09:01 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from qmta09.emeryville.ca.mail.comcast.net (qmta09.emeryville.ca.mail.comcast.net [IPv6:2001:558:fe2d:43:76:96:30:96]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4545F11E811F for <tictoc@ietf.org>; Thu, 16 May 2013 10:08:59 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from omta02.emeryville.ca.mail.comcast.net ([76.96.30.19]) by qmta09.emeryville.ca.mail.comcast.net with comcast id cfLm1l00A0QkzPwA9h8y6W; Thu, 16 May 2013 17:08:58 +0000
Received: from mail-ie0-x229.google.com ([IPv6:2607:f8b0:4001:c03::229]) by omta02.emeryville.ca.mail.comcast.net with comcast id ch8y1l00E4jVWYZ8Nh8ya7; Thu, 16 May 2013 17:08:58 +0000
Received: by mail-ie0-f169.google.com with SMTP id u16so7239681iet.0 for <tictoc@ietf.org>; Thu, 16 May 2013 10:08:58 -0700 (PDT)
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:x-received:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id :subject:from:to:cc:content-type; bh=HeZbUUHborfJdIo8aqqWTPntxw/aFrWCipd8UHyNtdE=; b=GinvmtgJ939vEmYkYitJlggndEg6KE7so/Zna9SnLGb4Lf2Y/rwwDUwCeV6frvaCVb RFYTZgtlu96covk0knjzKGjMgcJYThEalf0BDWjXsXyzLxcd5lPIrIIXnWf6kvTUlphh 3DiNQSmVzsVk2fqtQFlwXyyiwt9Yk7rVsJJYyNa2rrp5FeM6vTXbSP3MLEHU/loAWXlL vFalra110deBN92LKs4mwh75IRd3h8o11julQgVuUmN1d6Ty6xWXPl05DhqbG6OUfnWJ 4gD4Ic+Pi+NAWMAnw91JT+b06b/yauCixRp563ZJLOBo+sYjL9G7A8OOjzGLkflQiDLN jsJQ==
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.50.3.67 with SMTP id a3mr10134237iga.88.1368724138080; Thu, 16 May 2013 10:08:58 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.50.180.201 with HTTP; Thu, 16 May 2013 10:08:57 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <5194FE2F.2060504@isoc.org>
References: <5194FE2F.2060504@isoc.org>
Date: Thu, 16 May 2013 11:08:57 -0600
Message-ID: <CALw1_Q3DxKFc+oNFj_0iyDPp4m59hNS3--7R+nX_i1OzOaeT-g@mail.gmail.com>
From: Kevin Gross <kevin.gross@avanw.com>
To: Karen ODonoghue <odonoghue@isoc.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="089e013cbd5e0bc29d04dcd8ec6a"
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=comcast.net; s=q20121106; t=1368724138; bh=HeZbUUHborfJdIo8aqqWTPntxw/aFrWCipd8UHyNtdE=; h=Received:Received:Received:MIME-Version:Received:Date:Message-ID: Subject:From:To:Content-Type; b=UILIV3QTtWMaY20eLDTLmNSYvGIw1E5BftlWOZGqTNnJqUxMQxuRJG26a8KIpzyIl ftM0LzBj5ZkdmmOlbILx7c3vpZzPAbQIvkmNnbP+d+kbfT5ixtEIcLET4vHcIzJWie kwWR2ZEdUVCZe1QuSTD7gfUKPH7SsPO/geuxeNTW6uDVBsru7hmnmMEEJ4fZkUnPQ4 uw/50qn6AyF9BOsqVktPyeoq/i+z0SIMWcrlLgFSA5zgMY9epU4ORQjmnuY/eJuA+D cPm2KzoveizQd7tn7OWTWVVaZ76mKy4c/Ct9rB1bXb2AJ29aKZ/DzcBFQMyz6QWSpb +Ax8aOtmASuyQ==
Cc: "tictoc@ietf.org" <tictoc@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [TICTOC] WGLC on draft-ietf-tictoc-ptp-mib-05.txt
X-BeenThere: tictoc@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Timing over IP Connection and Transfer of Clock BOF <tictoc.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/tictoc>, <mailto:tictoc-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/tictoc>
List-Post: <mailto:tictoc@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tictoc-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tictoc>, <mailto:tictoc-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 16 May 2013 17:09:05 -0000

I submitted comments on v03 11 January (
http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/tictoc/current/msg01331.html). Vinay
indicated in a short message on 23 January the comments would be addressed
in the next version (
http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/tictoc/current/msg01333.html). v04 was
published 31 January. I did not see any notes from the authors associated
with that revision. A quick check of the v03-v04 diff shows evidence that
not all my comments were directly addressed. Can I get a summary of how my
comments were addressed? I'm fine if some of these were rejected but I
would like to verify that they were given consideration.

Kevin Gross
+1-303-447-0517
Media Network Consultant
AVA Networks - www.AVAnw.com <http://www.avanw.com/>, www.X192.org


On Thu, May 16, 2013 at 9:41 AM, Karen O'Donoghue <odonoghue@isoc.org>wrote:

> This message initiates a two week TICTOC Working Group Last Call on
> advancing:
>
> Title : Precision Time Protocol Version 2 (PTPv2) Management Information
> Base
> Author(s) : Vinay Shankarkumar, Laurent Montini, Tim Frost, Greg Dowd
> Filename : draft-ietf-tictoc-ptp-mib-05.**txt
> Pages : 77
> Date : 2013-02-25
>
> http://datatracker.ietf.org/**doc/draft-ietf-tictoc-ptp-mib/**
> ?include_text=1<http://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-tictoc-ptp-mib/?include_text=1>
>
> as a Standards Track RFC. Substantive comments and statements of support
> for advancing this document should be directed to the mailing list.
> Editorial suggestions can be sent directly to the authors. This last call
> will end on 31 May 2013.
>
> ______________________________**_________________
> TICTOC mailing list
> TICTOC@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/**listinfo/tictoc<https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tictoc>
>

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email