Re: [tlp-interest] Minor reference nit in bylaws

Brian E Carpenter <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com> Wed, 18 May 2022 22:28 UTC

Return-Path: <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: tlp-interest@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: tlp-interest@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id CD385C185B2F for <tlp-interest@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 18 May 2022 15:28:44 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -3.955
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.955 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, NICE_REPLY_A=-1.857, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_BLOCKED=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id s63th74sRcny for <tlp-interest@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 18 May 2022 15:28:44 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-pf1-x433.google.com (mail-pf1-x433.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::433]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (128/128 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7C232C185B2A for <tlp-interest@ietf.org>; Wed, 18 May 2022 15:28:44 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-pf1-x433.google.com with SMTP id p8so3416473pfh.8 for <tlp-interest@ietf.org>; Wed, 18 May 2022 15:28:44 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20210112; h=subject:to:references:from:message-id:date:user-agent:mime-version :in-reply-to:content-language:content-transfer-encoding; bh=42peDYEU5FmtUAINqOSws0SJXDP9lLPeLdwQI+9RsVk=; b=qf+gL1JqhMDPRrNbHxhA6zayJBYKeCYR9/+UsNmwhu1/p1nNCdDl/0S6OtEboRvyEK nAd1O+N9gci/qCqdbFnO6fDFn9zJn7aMJAxupIk4QuonpmgMTCSp3HUCTPqBkummT0oo 0jisZzoeemfxPUUA/PZUUmpm5BIdublj2DEXd9Ywv3QVn+WN+UBxNka7tTVRS7stX0KJ Su4fOr9eB+eaMpqjt0g7DO59fIAidJ8pJNox2jpjQFprk89r0zwcwpXWGSjpK+mvMW6l o693Tie2o8rT44VJEI42D+pBdMCF/ft0RqTZjYfxHKT6bFASbHffFWCJwgYn+3uSaZ+W rerQ==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=x-gm-message-state:subject:to:references:from:message-id:date :user-agent:mime-version:in-reply-to:content-language :content-transfer-encoding; bh=42peDYEU5FmtUAINqOSws0SJXDP9lLPeLdwQI+9RsVk=; b=WOXWy9PtRfEAOlWju9LwS3na8ss1hjOmjD7FsT3YFW02n0nZayzHlcFwTbTIoPU/WN 21BsKWVZXuS6luhZahJO/jvKseoW88huUQA1YxDlzveq+fNh8NOtXlzAGWeE7TjSEmHB skghBOJCPa7FVikwHO/2pt6WqsY1qFoHpvWlQGdYvHsTJGeRyVvQuM6FwImUcqVqrWNB rShBEvSfzkAY7HmXQku2dbVTA5Blg1c+1MZGbboIw52IaXTyzvni8juOA4MBnreJaE0r m28FtrtvXtQJ42iSGp1OMsmSCX98xJEChcKMOAwuu0OTZcK/2WACEd9Gyj9aCGO0AK6G Zlfg==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM531D/HHpbU3Zxi0/JgXwkncvkzM2SkzC+xnPHi8hWwTgKk/e+P10 2nVK2C/+ClbjLXewX6Yg+yeNuqinspTuyBFd
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJwKMVHeyjTiT0/aYcUhoun3P6UPSd3xq75WOOzYXf0OEZmu4wKPGORAnOSG+t/mR+cDibxvMQ==
X-Received: by 2002:a05:6a00:1805:b0:50d:ee59:b579 with SMTP id y5-20020a056a00180500b0050dee59b579mr1724737pfa.70.1652912923779; Wed, 18 May 2022 15:28:43 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ?IPv6:2001:df0:0:2006:80b2:5c79:2266:e431? ([2001:df0:0:2006:80b2:5c79:2266:e431]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id ik15-20020a170902ab0f00b0015e8d4eb1e1sm2139918plb.43.2022.05.18.15.28.41 for <tlp-interest@ietf.org> (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 bits=128/128); Wed, 18 May 2022 15:28:42 -0700 (PDT)
To: tlp-interest@ietf.org
References: <20220518201441.6042C4132511@ary.qy>
From: Brian E Carpenter <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com>
Message-ID: <ba6fb220-7203-d87a-f9f4-d8241821ec00@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 19 May 2022 10:28:40 +1200
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64; rv:78.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/78.10.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <20220518201441.6042C4132511@ary.qy>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"; format="flowed"
Content-Language: en-US
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/tlp-interest/yJfaFohOoaPTbfKlPrBrjfhC8tY>
Subject: Re: [tlp-interest] Minor reference nit in bylaws
X-BeenThere: tlp-interest@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.34
Precedence: list
List-Id: Discussion of proposed revisions to the Trust Legal Provisions <tlp-interest.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/tlp-interest>, <mailto:tlp-interest-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/tlp-interest/>
List-Post: <mailto:tlp-interest@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tlp-interest-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tlp-interest>, <mailto:tlp-interest-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 18 May 2022 22:28:44 -0000

On 19-May-22 08:14, John Levine wrote:
> It appears that Salz, Rich <rsalz@akamai.com> said:
>> -=-=-=-=-=-
>> The bylaws have “RFC 2026” in one place and “BCP 10” in another place.  I think the first reference should be “BCP 9”
> 
> Much of the language in the bylaws, including those two references, is
> deliberately copied verbatim from the current trust agreement to help
> make it clear what is not changing. Unless it's actively wrong I'd
> prefer to leave it alone.
> 
> It does say "RFC 2026 and any duly approved successor documents thereto."
> 
> R's,
> John
> 
> PS: I don't know why the original 2005 trust said RFC 2026 and BCP 10.

The original Trust Agreement cites "RFC 2026 and any duly approved successor documents thereto" and does not mention BCP 10 (which originated as RFC 2027). It does cite BCP 101.

     Brian