IETF Logo Mail Archive

[Tls-reg-review] [IANA #1184629] Re: Re: Request to register TLS integrity only cipher suites for TLS 1.3 (draft-camwinget-tls-ts13-macciphersuites)

Amanda Baber via RT <iana-prot-param@iana.org> Fri, 11 December 2020 19:04 UTC

Return-Path: <iana-shared@icann.org>
X-Original-To: tls-reg-review@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: tls-reg-review@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A65813A0DF3 for <tls-reg-review@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 11 Dec 2020 11:04:02 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.65
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.65 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS=0.249, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id OXVtpg6azv40 for <tls-reg-review@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 11 Dec 2020 11:04:01 -0800 (PST)
Received: from smtp.lax.icann.org (smtp.lax.icann.org [IPv6:2620:0:2d0:201::1:81]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 26AC73A0DEE for <tls-reg-review@ietf.org>; Fri, 11 Dec 2020 11:04:01 -0800 (PST)
Received: from request4.lax.icann.org (request1.lax.icann.org [10.32.11.221]) by smtp.lax.icann.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 07750E03FE; Fri, 11 Dec 2020 19:04:01 +0000 (UTC)
Received: by request4.lax.icann.org (Postfix, from userid 48) id 058C720622; Fri, 11 Dec 2020 19:04:01 +0000 (UTC)
RT-Owner: amanda.baber
From: Amanda Baber via RT <iana-prot-param@iana.org>
Reply-To: iana-prot-param@iana.org
In-Reply-To: <ED1241A7-6CA4-468F-BAFC-831F9642D683@akamai.com>
References: <RT-Ticket-1184629@icann.org> <RT-Ticket-1132414@icann.org> <CFEF8F6B-9136-4B4C-B6DE-0E635786A240@akamai.com> <rt-4.4.3-21493-1544578196-1273.1132414-37-0@icann.org> <B8FCF390-4B0A-46BC-B3AB-E92A7C7D4FCF@akamai.com> <20201210004439.GB64351@kduck.mit.edu> <96E22077-B954-4C3C-82AC-E311594D71A3@akamai.com> <20201210025635.GD64351@kduck.mit.edu> <DM5PR2201MB16432264A0EDF46FFCF2034B99CB0@DM5PR2201MB1643.namprd22.prod.outlook.com> <ED1241A7-6CA4-468F-BAFC-831F9642D683@akamai.com>
Message-ID: <rt-4.4.3-6200-1607713440-557.1184629-37-0@icann.org>
X-RT-Loop-Prevention: IANA
X-RT-Ticket: IANA #1184629
X-Managed-BY: RT 4.4.3 (http://www.bestpractical.com/rt/)
X-RT-Originator: amanda.baber@icann.org
To: jmvisoky@ra.rockwell.com, kaduk@mit.edu, rsalz@akamai.com
CC: tls-reg-review@ietf.org, ncamwing@cisco.com, jmvisoky=40ra.rockwell.com@dmarc.ietf.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
X-RT-Original-Encoding: utf-8
Precedence: bulk
Date: Fri, 11 Dec 2020 19:04:01 +0000
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/tls-reg-review/1Zq2Aq_ypFRWQRXE-UVUWVYgu34>
Subject: [Tls-reg-review] [IANA #1184629] Re: Re: Request to register TLS integrity only cipher suites for TLS 1.3 (draft-camwinget-tls-ts13-macciphersuites)
X-BeenThere: tls-reg-review@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
List-Id: TLS REVIEW <tls-reg-review.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/tls-reg-review>, <mailto:tls-reg-review-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/tls-reg-review/>
List-Post: <mailto:tls-reg-review@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tls-reg-review-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tls-reg-review>, <mailto:tls-reg-review-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 11 Dec 2020 19:04:03 -0000

Hi all,

Is there any action for IANA here?

thanks,

Amanda Baber
Lead IANA Services Specialist

On Thu Dec 10 23:04:10 2020, rsalz@akamai.com wrote:
> > I think we can use the reasoning that the record is not encrypted for
> > these cipher suites so the sequence numbers are also not encrypted.
> 
> > All that said, we should make this explicit in our RFC
> 
> Sounds good to me!
>

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email