IETF Logo Mail Archive

[Tls-reg-review] [IANA #1223648] expert review for draft-ietf-dprive-dnsoquic (tls-extensiontype-values)

Sabrina Tanamal via RT <drafts-expert-review@iana.org> Wed, 23 February 2022 01:13 UTC

Return-Path: <iana-shared@icann.org>
X-Original-To: tls-reg-review@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: tls-reg-review@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A93243A0BE3 for <tls-reg-review@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 22 Feb 2022 17:13:09 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -0.628
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.628 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS=0.25, MISSING_HEADERS=1.021, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id R_e2hg9DPz9s for <tls-reg-review@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 22 Feb 2022 17:13:05 -0800 (PST)
Received: from smtp.lax.icann.org (smtp.lax.icann.org [IPv6:2620:0:2d0:201::1:81]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 260063A0658 for <tls-reg-review@ietf.org>; Tue, 22 Feb 2022 17:13:05 -0800 (PST)
Received: from request4.lax.icann.org (request1.lax.icann.org [10.32.11.221]) by smtp.lax.icann.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EB9F3E3DB9 for <tls-reg-review@ietf.org>; Wed, 23 Feb 2022 01:13:03 +0000 (UTC)
Received: by request4.lax.icann.org (Postfix, from userid 48) id BADCF20905; Wed, 23 Feb 2022 01:13:03 +0000 (UTC)
RT-Owner: sabrina.tanamal
From: Sabrina Tanamal via RT <drafts-expert-review@iana.org>
Reply-To: drafts-expert-review@iana.org
In-Reply-To: <rt-4.4.3-14034-1643929756-803.1223648-37-0@icann.org>
References: <RT-Ticket-1223648@icann.org> <rt-4.4.3-11879-1643049722-1279.1223648-9-0@icann.org> <rt-4.4.3-12032-1643050103-951.1223648-9-0@icann.org> <AEC10B87-B73B-4992-9A5D-9A82FB5132F3@akamai.com> <rt-4.4.3-11879-1643055443-971.1223648-9-0@icann.org> <rt-4.4.3-15349-1643844875-1619.1223648-9-0@icann.org> <FB806827-1F4B-4D54-A352-8837CDD772C5@gmail.com> <rt-4.4.3-14034-1643929756-803.1223648-37-0@icann.org>
Message-ID: <rt-4.4.3-16331-1645578783-1359.1223648-37-0@icann.org>
X-RT-Loop-Prevention: IANA
X-RT-Ticket: IANA #1223648
X-Managed-BY: RT 4.4.3 (http://www.bestpractical.com/rt/)
X-RT-Originator: sabrina.tanamal@icann.org
CC: tls-reg-review@ietf.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
X-RT-Original-Encoding: utf-8
Precedence: bulk
Date: Wed, 23 Feb 2022 01:13:03 +0000
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/tls-reg-review/EaFF6mYTec3kzaGzVdqFpMlkDAo>
Subject: [Tls-reg-review] [IANA #1223648] expert review for draft-ietf-dprive-dnsoquic (tls-extensiontype-values)
X-BeenThere: tls-reg-review@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
List-Id: TLS REVIEW <tls-reg-review.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/tls-reg-review>, <mailto:tls-reg-review-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/tls-reg-review/>
List-Post: <mailto:tls-reg-review@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tls-reg-review-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tls-reg-review>, <mailto:tls-reg-review-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 23 Feb 2022 01:13:10 -0000

Hi Rich, Yoav, Nick,

This document has been updated since you last reviewed it. Can you confirm that the latest version (-09) is still OK? 

Thanks,
Sabrina

On Thu Feb 03 23:09:16 2022, ynir.ietf@gmail.com wrote:
> Yeah. Looks fine to me too.
> 
> > On 3 Feb 2022, at 1:34, Sabrina Tanamal via RT <drafts-expert-review-
> > comment@iana.org> wrote:
> >
> > Hi Yoav, Nick,
> >
> > Can one of you also approve this request?
> >
> > Thanks,
> >
> > Sabrina Tanamal
> > Lead IANA Services Specialist
> >
> > On Mon Jan 24 20:17:23 2022, rsalz@akamai.com wrote:
> >> Yes, Section 10.1 looks fine to me!
> >>
> >> On 1/24/22, 1:48 PM, "Sabrina Tanamal via RT" <drafts-expert-
> >> review-
> >> comment@iana.org> wrote:
> >>
> >> Hi Rich, Yoav, Nick,
> >>
> >> Can you review the proposed TLS Application-Layer Protocol
> >> Negotiation
> >> (ALPN) Protocol ID in this document for us?
> >>
> >> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-dprive-dnsoquic
> >>
> >> If this is OK, when the IESG approves the document for publication,
> >> we'll make the registration at
> >>
> >> https://urldefense.com/v3/__https://www.iana.org/assignments/tls-
> >> extensiontype-
> >> values__;!!GjvTz_vk!E1ITiqNBHC5kvMf_Re1xmd7nEnxw03_as74OspLpV2WBTYHVmf89oQu4tNRj$
> >>
> >> Please respond by February 9th.
> >>
> >> Best regards,
> >>
> >> Sabrina Tanamal
> >> Lead IANA Services Specialist
> >>
> >> _______________________________________________
> >> tls-reg-review mailing list
> >> tls-reg-review@ietf.org
> >> https://urldefense.com/v3/__https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tls-
> >> reg-
> >> review__;!!GjvTz_vk!E1ITiqNBHC5kvMf_Re1xmd7nEnxw03_as74OspLpV2WBTYHVmf89oRApbs6w$
> >>
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > tls-reg-review mailing list
> > tls-reg-review@ietf.org
> > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tls-reg-review

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email