IETF Logo Mail Archive

[Tls-reg-review] [IANA #1223648] expert review for draft-ietf-dprive-dnsoquic (tls-extensiontype-values)

Amanda Baber via RT <drafts-expert-review@iana.org> Thu, 31 March 2022 17:53 UTC

Return-Path: <iana-shared@icann.org>
X-Original-To: tls-reg-review@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: tls-reg-review@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C9D3C3A15E2 for <tls-reg-review@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 31 Mar 2022 10:53:08 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -6.661
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.661 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS=0.248, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id SdsxGGrhU7zW for <tls-reg-review@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 31 Mar 2022 10:53:03 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from smtp.lax.icann.org (smtp.lax.icann.org [IPv6:2620:0:2d0:201::1:81]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 06B5D3A15F1 for <tls-reg-review@ietf.org>; Thu, 31 Mar 2022 10:52:54 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from request4.lax.icann.org (request1.lax.icann.org [10.32.11.221]) by smtp.lax.icann.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D4BBFE384E; Thu, 31 Mar 2022 17:52:52 +0000 (UTC)
Received: by request4.lax.icann.org (Postfix, from userid 48) id EF1AC20EC6; Thu, 31 Mar 2022 17:52:52 +0000 (UTC)
RT-Owner: sabrina.tanamal
From: Amanda Baber via RT <drafts-expert-review@iana.org>
Reply-To: drafts-expert-review@iana.org
In-Reply-To: <rt-4.4.3-27631-1645637194-1794.1223648-37-0@icann.org>
References: <RT-Ticket-1223648@icann.org> <rt-4.4.3-11879-1643049722-1279.1223648-9-0@icann.org> <rt-4.4.3-12032-1643050103-951.1223648-9-0@icann.org> <AEC10B87-B73B-4992-9A5D-9A82FB5132F3@akamai.com> <FB806827-1F4B-4D54-A352-8837CDD772C5@gmail.com> <rt-4.4.3-14034-1643929756-803.1223648-37-0@icann.org> <rt-4.4.3-16331-1645578783-1359.1223648-37-0@icann.org> <A04C8610-5EEF-465E-A5AA-9F6247190F67@akamai.com> <622F7C19-BC2F-49C5-966C-7369F1A6E21F@gmail.com> <rt-4.4.3-27631-1645637194-1794.1223648-37-0@icann.org>
Message-ID: <rt-4.4.3-5998-1648749172-1447.1223648-37-0@icann.org>
X-RT-Loop-Prevention: IANA
X-RT-Ticket: IANA #1223648
X-Managed-BY: RT 4.4.3 (http://www.bestpractical.com/rt/)
X-RT-Originator: amanda.baber@icann.org
To: sabrina.tanamal@icann.org
CC: ynir.ietf@gmail.com, rsalz@akamai.com, tls-reg-review@ietf.org, rsalz=40akamai.com@dmarc.ietf.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
X-RT-Original-Encoding: utf-8
Precedence: bulk
Date: Thu, 31 Mar 2022 17:52:52 +0000
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/tls-reg-review/jwQi4OMDB2jaCjyWZEm1S564WQA>
Subject: [Tls-reg-review] [IANA #1223648] expert review for draft-ietf-dprive-dnsoquic (tls-extensiontype-values)
X-BeenThere: tls-reg-review@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
List-Id: TLS REVIEW <tls-reg-review.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/tls-reg-review>, <mailto:tls-reg-review-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/tls-reg-review/>
List-Post: <mailto:tls-reg-review@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tls-reg-review-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tls-reg-review>, <mailto:tls-reg-review-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 31 Mar 2022 17:53:09 -0000

Hi Rich, Yoav, Nick,

The IESG has approved version -11 of this document:

https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-ietf-dprive-dnsoquic

You reviewed version -09. Are there any issues that affect the ALPN registration?

If so, because we've recently started copying WGs on I-D review requests, we may forward your comments to the WG as well as the authors/chairs/ADs, with you in copy.

thanks,
Amanda

On Wed Feb 23 17:26:34 2022, ynir.ietf@gmail.com wrote:
> I agree with Rich.
> 
> > On 23 Feb 2022, at 16:39, Salz, Rich
> > <rsalz=40akamai.com@dmarc.ietf.org> wrote:
> >
> >> This document has been updated since you last reviewed it. Can you
> >> confirm that the latest version (-09) is still OK?
> >
> > I looked at the diff, https://www.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url1=draft-ietf-
> > dprive-dnsoquic-08&url2=draft-ietf-dprive-dnsoquic-09, and there's
> > some new text about security considerations and a handful of
> > editorial/presentation fixes.  Nothing that changes the ALPN.  So,
> > still looks good to me.
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > tls-reg-review mailing list
> > tls-reg-review@ietf.org
> > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tls-reg-review

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email