IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Tls-reg-review] [Emu] [IANA #1264437] expert review for draft-ietf-emu-tls-eap-types (tls-parameters)

Alan DeKok <aland@deployingradius.com> Thu, 19 January 2023 14:17 UTC

Return-Path: <aland@deployingradius.com>
X-Original-To: tls-reg-review@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: tls-reg-review@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A4E29C14E513; Thu, 19 Jan 2023 06:17:14 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -6.899
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.899 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id rJeQtZdIFKDT; Thu, 19 Jan 2023 06:17:10 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail.networkradius.com (mail.networkradius.com [62.210.147.122]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E4B66C14CF1C; Thu, 19 Jan 2023 06:17:09 -0800 (PST)
Received: from smtpclient.apple (135-23-95-173.cpe.pppoe.ca [135.23.95.173]) by mail.networkradius.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 205031AB; Thu, 19 Jan 2023 14:17:06 +0000 (UTC)
Authentication-Results: NetworkRADIUS; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=deployingradius.com
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 16.0 \(3696.120.41.1.1\))
From: Alan DeKok <aland@deployingradius.com>
In-Reply-To: <349F6743-C4F4-40EC-9FAB-862BA3E01932@akamai.com>
Date: Thu, 19 Jan 2023 09:17:05 -0500
Cc: "drafts-expert-review-comment@iana.org" <drafts-expert-review-comment@iana.org>, "emu@ietf.org" <emu@ietf.org>, "tls-reg-review@ietf.org" <tls-reg-review@ietf.org>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <BF3968F6-2341-4513-AF56-E7A16613D037@deployingradius.com>
References: <RT-Ticket-1264437@icann.org> <rt-5.0.3-49710-1674071725-1336.1264437-9-0@icann.org> <rt-5.0.3-56953-1674079809-1714.1264437-9-0@icann.org> <349F6743-C4F4-40EC-9FAB-862BA3E01932@akamai.com>
To: "Salz, Rich" <rsalz=40akamai.com@dmarc.ietf.org>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3696.120.41.1.1)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/tls-reg-review/TjbrLfZJ6MY12arQzVAoErV6r64>
Subject: Re: [Tls-reg-review] [Emu] [IANA #1264437] expert review for draft-ietf-emu-tls-eap-types (tls-parameters)
X-BeenThere: tls-reg-review@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.39
Precedence: list
List-Id: TLS REVIEW <tls-reg-review.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/tls-reg-review>, <mailto:tls-reg-review-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/tls-reg-review/>
List-Post: <mailto:tls-reg-review@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tls-reg-review-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tls-reg-review>, <mailto:tls-reg-review-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 19 Jan 2023 14:17:14 -0000

On Jan 18, 2023, at 6:13 PM, Salz, Rich <rsalz=40akamai.com@dmarc.ietf.org> wrote:
> 
> I prefer to not have an embedded space in the exporter label, can they WG remove it?

  At this point, I don't think so.  We have implementations which use these values.

> The only other instance is "EXPORTER: teap..." and when looking at the existing registry, I didn't notice the space after the colon at first.

  Does the space cause a problem?  I don't recall seeing guidance on TLS exporter labels which suggest that spaces should be avoided.

  Alan DeKok.

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email