[Tls-reg-review] [IANA #1287144] Re: Early IANA code allocations for draft-ietf-tls-esni

Amanda Baber via RT <iana-prot-param-comment@iana.org> Wed, 13 December 2023 18:36 UTC

Return-Path: <iana-shared@icann.org>
X-Original-To: tls-reg-review@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: tls-reg-review@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id F388BC14CEFA for <tls-reg-review@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 13 Dec 2023 10:36:01 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -5.637
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.637 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS=0.249, MISSING_HEADERS=1.021, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01, URIBL_DBL_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, URIBL_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id vBmqmtydQE9C for <tls-reg-review@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 13 Dec 2023 10:35:58 -0800 (PST)
Received: from smtp.lax.icann.org (smtp.lax.icann.org [IPv6:2620:0:2d0:201::1:81]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 65EEBC14F5E4 for <tls-reg-review@ietf.org>; Wed, 13 Dec 2023 10:35:58 -0800 (PST)
Received: from request6.lax.icann.org (request1.lax.icann.org [10.32.11.221]) by smtp.lax.icann.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 41650E62F1; Wed, 13 Dec 2023 18:35:58 +0000 (UTC)
Received: by request6.lax.icann.org (Postfix, from userid 48) id 3EE2A7A63E; Wed, 13 Dec 2023 18:35:58 +0000 (UTC)
RT-Owner: sabrina.tanamal
From: Amanda Baber via RT <iana-prot-param-comment@iana.org>
Reply-To: iana-prot-param-comment@iana.org
In-Reply-To: <rt-5.0.3-881273-1702475821-1396.1287144-9-0@icann.org>
References: <RT-Ticket-1287144@icann.org> <9AA6E007-90C6-43F9-8033-B9EB6F15EFCD@sn3rd.com> <5FFCD06C-AF34-4A76-8A0A-C6F7FD3FC3CD@sn3rd.com> <rt-5.0.3-657427-1702427572-1862.1287144-9-0@icann.org> <A4BBF397-ECBF-480B-820D-62DF9B3EB4DA@akamai.com> <rt-5.0.3-881273-1702475821-1396.1287144-9-0@icann.org>
Message-ID: <rt-5.0.3-918659-1702492558-813.1287144-9-0@icann.org>
X-RT-Loop-Prevention: IANA
X-RT-Ticket: IANA #1287144
X-Managed-BY: RT 5.0.3 (http://www.bestpractical.com/rt/)
X-RT-Originator: amanda.baber@icann.org
CC: tls-reg-review@ietf.org, ynir.ietf@gmail.com, rsalz@akamai.com
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-RT-Original-Encoding: utf-8
Precedence: bulk
Date: Wed, 13 Dec 2023 18:35:58 +0000
MIME-Version: 1.0
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/tls-reg-review/aULVLYAoPjQrvPAWeMryrUCp3aI>
Subject: [Tls-reg-review] [IANA #1287144] Re: Early IANA code allocations for draft-ietf-tls-esni
X-BeenThere: tls-reg-review@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.39
List-Id: TLS REVIEW <tls-reg-review.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/tls-reg-review>, <mailto:tls-reg-review-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/tls-reg-review/>
List-Post: <mailto:tls-reg-review@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tls-reg-review-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tls-reg-review>, <mailto:tls-reg-review-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 13 Dec 2023 18:36:02 -0000

Hi Yoav, 

Can you sign off on this one as well?

thanks,
Amanda

On Wed Dec 13 13:57:01 2023, rsalz@akamai.com wrote:
> Confirmed.
> 
> As for footnote vs references vs just-wait, I'm fine with whatever you
> decide.
> 
> On 12/12/23, 7:32 PM, "Amanda Baber via RT" <iana-prot-param-
> comment@iana.org <mailto:iana-prot-param-comment@iana.org>> wrote:
> 
> 
> Hi Rich, Yoav,
> 
> 
> Before we make the TLS ExtensionType registrations for this document,
> can you confirm that you're OK with listing "CH" as the TLS 1.3 entry
> for ech_outer_extensions (as opposed to leaving it blank)? The comment
> "Only appears in inner CH" will be added in the future. See below.
> 
> 
> I should add that if you want us to, and Sean agrees, we could add
> that comment now as a temporary footnote, either in the TLS 1.3 field
> or the Reference field.
> 
> 
> See Sean's message below.
> 
> 
> thanks,
> Amanda
> 
> 
> =====
> 
> 
> These changes are based on the following PRs:
>  https://urldefense.com/v3/__https://github.com/tlswg/draft-ietf-tls-
> esni/pull/584/files__;!!GjvTz_vk!SdkivvVzFz2cbYyEeEtkEeJo3UyFd02qHOzAYdL9oOAa6PGNfQvtSWThP6lSvV7hiyLFMsznEYB8I5R9KK19m-
> 0$ <https://urldefense.com/v3/__https://github.com/tlswg/draft-ietf-
> tls-
> esni/pull/584/files__;!!GjvTz_vk!SdkivvVzFz2cbYyEeEtkEeJo3UyFd02qHOzAYdL9oOAa6PGNfQvtSWThP6lSvV7hiyLFMsznEYB8I5R9KK19m-
> 0$>
>  https://urldefense.com/v3/__https://github.com/tlswg/draft-ietf-tls-
> esni/pull/597/files__;!!GjvTz_vk!SdkivvVzFz2cbYyEeEtkEeJo3UyFd02qHOzAYdL9oOAa6PGNfQvtSWThP6lSvV7hiyLFMsznEYB8I5R9o8T7cI4$
> <https://urldefense.com/v3/__https://github.com/tlswg/draft-ietf-tls-
> esni/pull/597/files__;!!GjvTz_vk!SdkivvVzFz2cbYyEeEtkEeJo3UyFd02qHOzAYdL9oOAa6PGNfQvtSWThP6lSvV7hiyLFMsznEYB8I5R9o8T7cI4$>
> 
> 
> *****
> NOTE: The instructions from Section 11.1 #2 include a reference to a
> “Comment” column. That column does not yet exist. It is being created
> by draft-ietf-tls-rfc8447bis; you can see the IANA instructions in the
> following link:
>  https://urldefense.com/v3/__https://tlswg.org/rfc8447bis/draft-ietf-
> tls-rfc8447bis.html
> <https://urldefense.com/v3/__https://tlswg.org/rfc8447bis/draft-ietf-
> tls-rfc8447bis.html>*name-adding-comment-
> column__;Iw!!GjvTz_vk!SdkivvVzFz2cbYyEeEtkEeJo3UyFd02qHOzAYdL9oOAa6PGNfQvtSWThP6lSvV7hiyLFMsznEYB8I5R9EgdZzSo$
> 
> 
> draft-ietf-tls-rfc8447bis has one remaining issue and will therefore
> track draft-ietf-tls-esni very closely. We would like to manage adding
> the value for the Comment column later based on these instructions
> later in the process. We prefer not to have a normative reference to
> draft-ietf-tls-rfc8447bis.
> *****
> 
> 
> 
> 
> The amended request is as follows:
> 
> 
> 11.1. Update of the TLS ExtensionType Registry
> 
> 
> IANA is requested to create the following entries in the existing
> registry for ExtensionType (defined in [RFC8446]):
> 
> 
> 1. encrypted_client_hello(0xfe0d), with "TLS 1.3" column values set to
> "CH, HRR, EE", "DTLS-Only" column set to "N", and "Recommended" column
> set
> to "Yes”.
> 
> 
> 2. ech_outer_extensions(0xfd00), with the "TLS 1.3" column values set
> to "CH",
> "DTLS-Only" column set to "N", "Recommended" column set to "Yes", and
> the
> "Comment" column set to "Only appears in inner CH."
> 
> 
> 11.2. Update of the TLS Alert Registry
> 
> 
> IANA is requested to create an entry, ech_required(121) in the
> existing registry for Alerts (defined in [RFC8446]), with the "DTLS-
> OK" column set to "Y”.
> 
> 
> spt
> 
> 
>