IETF Logo Mail Archive

[Tls-reg-review] [IANA #1287144] Re: Early IANA code allocations for draft-ietf-tls-esni

Sabrina Tanamal via RT <iana-prot-param-comment@iana.org> Wed, 08 November 2023 14:55 UTC

Return-Path: <iana-shared@icann.org>
X-Original-To: tls-reg-review@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: tls-reg-review@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E2DC7C14F736 for <tls-reg-review@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 8 Nov 2023 06:55:41 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -0.633
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.633 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS=0.249, MISSING_HEADERS=1.021, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_BLOCKED=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H4=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=0.001, RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001, URIBL_DBL_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, URIBL_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id euci8twymzZ9 for <tls-reg-review@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 8 Nov 2023 06:55:38 -0800 (PST)
Received: from smtp.lax.icann.org (smtp.lax.icann.org [192.0.33.81]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 56530C14F5E0 for <tls-reg-review@ietf.org>; Wed, 8 Nov 2023 06:55:38 -0800 (PST)
Received: from request6.lax.icann.org (request1.lax.icann.org [10.32.11.221]) by smtp.lax.icann.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1B064E1ADF for <tls-reg-review@ietf.org>; Wed, 8 Nov 2023 14:55:38 +0000 (UTC)
Received: by request6.lax.icann.org (Postfix, from userid 48) id 18B6E145131; Wed, 8 Nov 2023 14:55:38 +0000 (UTC)
RT-Owner: sabrina.tanamal
From: Sabrina Tanamal via RT <iana-prot-param-comment@iana.org>
Reply-To: iana-prot-param-comment@iana.org
In-Reply-To: <5FFCD06C-AF34-4A76-8A0A-C6F7FD3FC3CD@sn3rd.com>
References: <RT-Ticket-1287144@icann.org> <9AA6E007-90C6-43F9-8033-B9EB6F15EFCD@sn3rd.com> <5FFCD06C-AF34-4A76-8A0A-C6F7FD3FC3CD@sn3rd.com>
Message-ID: <rt-5.0.3-1218047-1699455338-1745.1287144-9-0@icann.org>
X-RT-Loop-Prevention: IANA
X-RT-Ticket: IANA #1287144
X-Managed-BY: RT 5.0.3 (http://www.bestpractical.com/rt/)
X-RT-Originator: sabrina.tanamal@icann.org
CC: tls-reg-review@ietf.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-RT-Original-Encoding: utf-8
Precedence: bulk
Date: Wed, 08 Nov 2023 14:55:38 +0000
MIME-Version: 1.0
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/tls-reg-review/hH-ekinT0U15MV5wbNhGeJN65go>
Subject: [Tls-reg-review] [IANA #1287144] Re: Early IANA code allocations for draft-ietf-tls-esni
X-BeenThere: tls-reg-review@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.39
List-Id: TLS REVIEW <tls-reg-review.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/tls-reg-review>, <mailto:tls-reg-review-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/tls-reg-review/>
List-Post: <mailto:tls-reg-review@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tls-reg-review-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tls-reg-review>, <mailto:tls-reg-review-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 08 Nov 2023 14:55:42 -0000

Hi Rich and Yoav,

Can you review the TLS ExtensionType Value registrations in draft-ietf-tls-esni for us? Please see below. 

If these are OK, should we make permanent registrations or temporary early allocations, which can be renewed if publication approval is postponed for more than a year? 

Document: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-ietf-tls-esni
Registry: https://www.iana.org/assignments/tls-extensiontype-values

Nick is one of the authors of the document. 

The due date for this is November 29th, per RFC 8447. 

Thank you!

Sabrina

> > On Nov 6, 2023, at 11:52, Sean Turner <sean@sn3rd.com> wrote:
> >
> > Hi! The TLS WG has consensus to request the following three code
> > points and their values as document in Section 11 of draft-ietf-tls-
> > esni.  Section 11 is not that long so I have just copied it here:11.
> > IANA Considerations
> >
> > 11.1.  Update of the TLS ExtensionType Registry
> >
> > IANA is requested to create the following entries in the existing
> > registry for ExtensionType (defined in [RFC8446]):
> >
> > 1.  encrypted_client_hello(0xfe0d), with "TLS 1.3" column values set
> >     to "CH, HRR, EE", and "Recommended" column set to "Yes".
> >
> > 2.  ech_outer_extensions(0xfd00), with the "TLS 1.3" column values
> >     set to "", and "Recommended" column set to "Yes".
> >
> > 11.2.  Update of the TLS Alert Registry
> >
> > IANA is requested to create an entry, ech_required(121) in the
> > existing registry for Alerts (defined in [RFC8446]), with the "DTLS-
> > OK" column set to "Y”.
> >
> > Cheers,
> > spt

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email