[Tls-reg-review] [IANA #1161281] Re: Request to register value in TLS extension registry for Delegated Credentials (draft-ietf-tls-subcerts)

"Amanda Baber via RT" <iana-prot-param-comment@iana.org> Thu, 30 January 2020 23:25 UTC

Return-Path: <iana-shared@icann.org>
X-Original-To: tls-reg-review@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: tls-reg-review@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E99AE120026 for <tls-reg-review@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 30 Jan 2020 15:25:10 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.929
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.929 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS=0.25, MISSING_HEADERS=1.021, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 8gVWGHv4knqh for <tls-reg-review@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 30 Jan 2020 15:25:09 -0800 (PST)
Received: from smtp01.icann.org (smtp01.icann.org [192.0.33.81]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8CAC81200F7 for <tls-reg-review@ietf.org>; Thu, 30 Jan 2020 15:25:09 -0800 (PST)
Received: from request4.lax.icann.org (request1.lax.icann.org [10.32.11.221]) by smtp01.icann.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 669F2E0924; Thu, 30 Jan 2020 23:25:09 +0000 (UTC)
Received: by request4.lax.icann.org (Postfix, from userid 48) id 635E220493; Thu, 30 Jan 2020 23:25:09 +0000 (UTC)
RT-Owner: amanda.baber
From: "Amanda Baber via RT" <iana-prot-param-comment@iana.org>
Reply-To: iana-prot-param-comment@iana.org
In-Reply-To: <CAFDDyk9F3mSCiJAg5qGJazHiJYKMqyp2FXX7KsGdnwbPa6QN1Q@mail.gmail.com>
References: <RT-Ticket-1161281@icann.org> <RT-Ticket-1147787@icann.org> <CAFDDyk94r3BV2=KiqzpRTQvoNN8S_vjXCfY-qxy0-r8A4RxnCQ@mail.gmail.com> <rt-4.4.3-9078-1567555554-1375.1147787-9-0@icann.org> <CAFDDyk90=9shEVm2D-3e2iRAZON3GppG5S0n-RCdxbEkap+fLg@mail.gmail.com> <CAFDDyk9F3mSCiJAg5qGJazHiJYKMqyp2FXX7KsGdnwbPa6QN1Q@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <rt-4.4.3-1803-1580426709-885.1161281-9-0@icann.org>
X-RT-Loop-Prevention: IANA
X-RT-Ticket: IANA #1161281
X-Managed-BY: RT 4.4.3 (http://www.bestpractical.com/rt/)
X-RT-Originator: amanda.baber@icann.org
CC: ynir.ietf@gmail.com, tls-reg-review@ietf.org, rsalz@akamai.com
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
X-RT-Original-Encoding: utf-8
Precedence: bulk
Date: Thu, 30 Jan 2020 23:25:09 +0000
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/tls-reg-review/vZ5tCnNjVRQyAFT7HcDOvqe-lnY>
Subject: [Tls-reg-review] [IANA #1161281] Re: Request to register value in TLS extension registry for Delegated Credentials (draft-ietf-tls-subcerts)
X-BeenThere: tls-reg-review@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
List-Id: TLS REVIEW <tls-reg-review.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/tls-reg-review>, <mailto:tls-reg-review-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/tls-reg-review/>
List-Post: <mailto:tls-reg-review@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tls-reg-review-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tls-reg-review>, <mailto:tls-reg-review-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 30 Jan 2020 23:25:11 -0000

Rich, Yoav,

This has already been approved; can you confirm that we can make the assignment now?

thanks,
Amanda

On Thu Jan 30 23:19:48 2020, nick@cloudflare.com wrote:
> Update: TLS chairs have asked for early assignment. I'm conflicted out from
> voting on this one since it's my draft, but I'd be happy to see the
> assignment happen sooner so I can submit a WGLC version of the draft
> including the extension point.
> 
> Nick
> 
> On Tue, Sep 3, 2019 at 5:08 PM Nick Sullivan <nick@cloudflare.com> wrote:
> 
> > Hi Amanda,
> >
> > Let's wait to make the assignment.
> >
> > Nick
> >
> > On Tue, Sep 3, 2019 at 5:05 PM Amanda Baber via RT <
> > iana-prot-param-comment@iana.org> wrote:
> >
> >> Hi Nick,
> >>
> >> Resending this question: can you confirm that we should make this
> >> assignment now, rather than before the document is approved?
> >>
> >> If so, should we use value(s) 33-34, 36-40, 54, or 57-65279?
> >>
> >> thanks,
> >> Amanda
> >>
> >> On Fri Aug 02 19:50:20 2019, rsalz@akamai.com wrote:
> >> > I am fine with whatever number Nick wants :)
> >> >
> >> > On 8/2/19, 2:19 PM, "Amanda Baber via RT" <iana-prot-param@iana.org>
> >> > wrote:
> >> >
> >> > Hi all,
> >> >
> >> > If you'd like us to make the assignment now, should we take the value
> >> > from range 32-34, 36-40, or 54-65279?
> >> >
> >> > thanks,
> >> > Amanda
> >> >
> >> > On Wed Jul 24 13:37:01 2019, amanda.baber wrote:
> >> > > Hi all,
> >> > >
> >> > > Should we make this registration now or wait for the document to be
> >> > > approved?
> >> > >
> >> > > thanks,
> >> > > Amanda
> >> > >
> >> > > On Tue Jul 23 22:03:58 2019, nick@cloudflare.com wrote:
> >> > > > Hello,
> >> > > >
> >> > > > I'd like to request a review from the other two members of the
> >> > > > review
> >> > > > panel
> >> > > > for a new extension value for a draft that is currently adopted by
> >> > > > the TLS
> >> > > > working group: Delegated Credentials for TLS.
> >> > > >
> >> > > > https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-tls-subcerts/
> >> > > >
> >> > > > CH, CR, CT, Recommended: Y
> >> > > >
> >> > > > Nick
> >> >
> >> >
> >> >
> >>
> >