IETF Logo Mail Archive

RE: [TLS] New I-Ds: draft-rescorla-tls-opaque-prf-input-00 anddraft-rescorla-tls-suiteb-00

<Pasi.Eronen@nokia.com> Wed, 20 December 2006 15:06 UTC

Received: from [127.0.0.1] (helo=stiedprmman1.va.neustar.com) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Gx31z-0007Q2-0M; Wed, 20 Dec 2006 10:06:55 -0500
Received: from [10.91.34.44] (helo=ietf-mx.ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Gx31x-0007Pv-HP for tls@lists.ietf.org; Wed, 20 Dec 2006 10:06:53 -0500
Received: from smtp.nokia.com ([131.228.20.170] helo=mgw-ext11.nokia.com) by ietf-mx.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Gx31w-00017p-2l for tls@lists.ietf.org; Wed, 20 Dec 2006 10:06:53 -0500
Received: from esebh105.NOE.Nokia.com (esebh105.ntc.nokia.com [172.21.138.211]) by mgw-ext11.nokia.com (Switch-3.2.5/Switch-3.2.5) with ESMTP id kBKF5NPL032439; Wed, 20 Dec 2006 17:05:55 +0200
Received: from esebh103.NOE.Nokia.com ([172.21.143.33]) by esebh105.NOE.Nokia.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.1830); Wed, 20 Dec 2006 17:05:58 +0200
Received: from esebe105.NOE.Nokia.com ([172.21.143.53]) by esebh103.NOE.Nokia.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.1830); Wed, 20 Dec 2006 17:05:58 +0200
x-mimeole: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.5
Content-class: urn:content-classes:message
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Subject: RE: [TLS] New I-Ds: draft-rescorla-tls-opaque-prf-input-00 anddraft-rescorla-tls-suiteb-00
Date: Wed, 20 Dec 2006 17:05:58 +0200
Message-ID: <B356D8F434D20B40A8CEDAEC305A1F24038FD75A@esebe105.NOE.Nokia.com>
In-Reply-To: <BAY103-W5A35517F524DCAD707A4D92C90@phx.gbl>
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
Thread-Topic: [TLS] New I-Ds: draft-rescorla-tls-opaque-prf-input-00 anddraft-rescorla-tls-suiteb-00
Thread-Index: Acci9ipnWsxB0GWGRDWqk/HpfbUZMABUTzAw
From: Pasi.Eronen@nokia.com
To: ekr@networkresonance.com
X-OriginalArrivalTime: 20 Dec 2006 15:05:58.0672 (UTC) FILETIME=[5B061900:01C72448]
X-Nokia-AV: Clean
X-Spam-Score: 1.3 (+)
X-Scan-Signature: 68c8cc8a64a9d0402e43b8eee9fc4199
Cc: tls@lists.ietf.org
X-BeenThere: tls@lists.ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: "This is the mailing list for the Transport Layer Security working group of the IETF." <tls.lists.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tls>, <mailto:tls-request@lists.ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www1.ietf.org/pipermail/tls>
List-Post: <mailto:tls@lists.ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tls-request@lists.ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tls>, <mailto:tls-request@lists.ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: tls-bounces@lists.ietf.org

I sort of agree with what Peter already said about the
opaque-prf-input draft. It is clearly the "lower layer" of some
mechanism for doing something useful. It's not useful if we don't 
know what the "upper layer", "some mechanism" or "something useful" 
are, and without knowing those, it's very difficult to comment the 
draft or support its advancement.

So, more details would be very welcome! 

Best regards,
Pasi

_______________________________________________
TLS mailing list
TLS@lists.ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tls

v2.46.0 | Report a Bug | By Email | System Status