Re: [TLS] [Editorial Errata Reported] RFC6066 (4817)

Sean Turner <sean@sn3rd.com> Wed, 05 October 2016 16:44 UTC

Return-Path: <sean@sn3rd.com>
X-Original-To: tls@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: tls@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9BF301297A6 for <tls@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 5 Oct 2016 09:44:55 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.701
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.701 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=sn3rd.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id mVukMrEnyv4Z for <tls@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 5 Oct 2016 09:44:54 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-qk0-x234.google.com (mail-qk0-x234.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400d:c09::234]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2C81B129796 for <tls@ietf.org>; Wed, 5 Oct 2016 09:44:54 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-qk0-x234.google.com with SMTP id t7so224110050qkh.2 for <tls@ietf.org>; Wed, 05 Oct 2016 09:44:54 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=sn3rd.com; s=google; h=mime-version:subject:from:in-reply-to:date:cc :content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to; bh=kmHaaWHtKC3xZyVcsnTviU/XezvTqEHAyO4+DR2sVtk=; b=L+GhvkzRstNVaIcC9MtqQOayKiNaFnRfIatWfq5/axXlL13hA2EqJ1dQAu+Pspk8LJ aRLziBS9nPMMEX4SxG5VipbZlMOCNMyemWkW2CiadKEPIHEZcldTJIVYvBA3l0qB2IRu 0Po/VEtD4FUgJiuO7IE2s4rRpPY2SvtR5IRG0=
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:subject:from:in-reply-to:date:cc :content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to; bh=kmHaaWHtKC3xZyVcsnTviU/XezvTqEHAyO4+DR2sVtk=; b=XWJ95D9lsy47HaeznzO99DGFUWkWV0Ku7NULeR/RS8OwckMHg6+gHQAYnWgrtUMX89 MCWG2dkr36Ki1QDITVZL1wCk+eE/y6+2Z9GsO/pm5dEiLWkC8dbKu4Fvp65mdFndeZHc KSi394N9u1b56PQni2EF+Xu7GleHMOOktrVBIUhcg0nf91BS42Y+feAkffDwCKXupbFT MzX/7zJvhKdMG2p62l3sI92J19HgSZtpgQQuNXJtmnCpzY5cfXyi1DtN+YcLERT9jEOU RqHzeZDnMkdS1EoNUbu27S8n1FVv2VsjIA5bHsLd9pBSj+due4CtPLmJMYL6GbPygft3 kLWw==
X-Gm-Message-State: AA6/9RnOIx3FTGoKqGa4KaGfjWFHzEuSzAD1C2VlJiyQgxTzelUTqvvw4ga4opEb8VHbKA==
X-Received: by 10.55.11.131 with SMTP id 125mr9911141qkl.112.1475685893272; Wed, 05 Oct 2016 09:44:53 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [172.16.0.112] ([96.231.229.241]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id 22sm3768747qkj.15.2016.10.05.09.44.51 (version=TLS1 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-SHA bits=128/128); Wed, 05 Oct 2016 09:44:52 -0700 (PDT)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 9.3 \(3124\))
From: Sean Turner <sean@sn3rd.com>
In-Reply-To: <20161003174712.B39F7B80C3B@rfc-editor.org>
Date: Wed, 5 Oct 2016 12:44:50 -0400
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <E3F44B72-DE6F-4677-A870-EFB8B367C553@sn3rd.com>
References: <20161003174712.B39F7B80C3B@rfc-editor.org>
To: Stephen Farrell <stephen.farrell@cs.tcd.ie>, Kathleen Moriarty <Kathleen.Moriarty.ietf@gmail.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3124)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/tls/0hYKrT6twVCrihP4_R7qM5lJM7M>
Cc: d3e3e3@gmail.com, vincentleest@gmail.com, "<tls@ietf.org>" <tls@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [TLS] [Editorial Errata Reported] RFC6066 (4817)
X-BeenThere: tls@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: "This is the mailing list for the Transport Layer Security working group of the IETF." <tls.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/tls>, <mailto:tls-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/tls/>
List-Post: <mailto:tls@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tls-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tls>, <mailto:tls-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 05 Oct 2016 16:44:55 -0000

Looks like this one can safely be accepted.

spt

> On Oct 03, 2016, at 13:47, RFC Errata System <rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org> wrote:
> 
> The following errata report has been submitted for RFC6066,
> "Transport Layer Security (TLS) Extensions: Extension Definitions".
> 
> --------------------------------------
> You may review the report below and at:
> http://www.rfc-editor.org/errata_search.php?rfc=6066&eid=4817
> 
> --------------------------------------
> Type: Editorial
> Reported by: ResponderIDs type is not defined anywhere. <vincentleest@gmail.com>
> 
> Section: 8
> 
> Original Text
> -------------
> In the OCSPStatusRequest, the "ResponderIDs" provides a list of OCSP
> responders that the client trusts. 
> 
> Corrected Text
> --------------
> In the OCSPStatusRequest, the "ResponderID" provides a list of OCSP
> responders that the client trusts.
> 
> or clearer 
> 
> In OCSPStatusRequest, the "responder_id_list" provides a list of
> "ResponderID", OCSP responders that the client trusts.
> 
> Notes
> -----
> ResponderIDs is not defined anywhere within the document.
> 
> Quote of this section in RFC6961 section 2.2 (p.4) seem to have fixed this.
> 
> Instructions:
> -------------
> This erratum is currently posted as "Reported". If necessary, please
> use "Reply All" to discuss whether it should be verified or
> rejected. When a decision is reached, the verifying party (IESG)
> can log in to change the status and edit the report, if necessary. 
> 
> --------------------------------------
> RFC6066 (draft-ietf-tls-rfc4366-bis-12)
> --------------------------------------
> Title               : Transport Layer Security (TLS) Extensions: Extension Definitions
> Publication Date    : January 2011
> Author(s)           : D. Eastlake 3rd
> Category            : PROPOSED STANDARD
> Source              : Transport Layer Security
> Area                : Security
> Stream              : IETF
> Verifying Party     : IESG
>