[TLS] [Editorial Errata Reported] RFC6066 (4817)

RFC Errata System <rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org> Mon, 03 October 2016 17:47 UTC

Return-Path: <wwwrun@rfc-editor.org>
X-Original-To: tls@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: tls@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost []) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1302E129447 for <tls@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 3 Oct 2016 10:47:14 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -105.598
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-105.598 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-2.996, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com []) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id z_JzFJzuMQGu for <tls@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 3 Oct 2016 10:47:12 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from rfc-editor.org (rfc-editor.org []) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id BDF77129443 for <tls@ietf.org>; Mon, 3 Oct 2016 10:47:12 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by rfc-editor.org (Postfix, from userid 30) id B39F7B80C3B; Mon, 3 Oct 2016 10:47:12 -0700 (PDT)
To: d3e3e3@gmail.com, stephen.farrell@cs.tcd.ie, Kathleen.Moriarty.ietf@gmail.com, sean+ietf@sn3rd.com, joe@salowey.net
X-PHP-Originating-Script: 30:errata_mail_lib.php
From: RFC Errata System <rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org>
Message-Id: <20161003174712.B39F7B80C3B@rfc-editor.org>
Date: Mon, 03 Oct 2016 10:47:12 -0700
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/tls/nNRFUZcrbYsqrAefbry_ZASINNk>
Cc: rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org, vincentleest@gmail.com, tls@ietf.org
Subject: [TLS] [Editorial Errata Reported] RFC6066 (4817)
X-BeenThere: tls@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: "This is the mailing list for the Transport Layer Security working group of the IETF." <tls.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/tls>, <mailto:tls-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/tls/>
List-Post: <mailto:tls@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tls-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tls>, <mailto:tls-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 03 Oct 2016 17:47:14 -0000

The following errata report has been submitted for RFC6066,
"Transport Layer Security (TLS) Extensions: Extension Definitions".

You may review the report below and at:

Type: Editorial
Reported by: ResponderIDs type is not defined anywhere. <vincentleest@gmail.com>

Section: 8

Original Text
In the OCSPStatusRequest, the "ResponderIDs" provides a list of OCSP
responders that the client trusts. 

Corrected Text
In the OCSPStatusRequest, the "ResponderID" provides a list of OCSP
responders that the client trusts.

or clearer 

In OCSPStatusRequest, the "responder_id_list" provides a list of
"ResponderID", OCSP responders that the client trusts.

ResponderIDs is not defined anywhere within the document.

Quote of this section in RFC6961 section 2.2 (p.4) seem to have fixed this.

This erratum is currently posted as "Reported". If necessary, please
use "Reply All" to discuss whether it should be verified or
rejected. When a decision is reached, the verifying party (IESG)
can log in to change the status and edit the report, if necessary. 

RFC6066 (draft-ietf-tls-rfc4366-bis-12)
Title               : Transport Layer Security (TLS) Extensions: Extension Definitions
Publication Date    : January 2011
Author(s)           : D. Eastlake 3rd
Category            : PROPOSED STANDARD
Source              : Transport Layer Security
Area                : Security
Stream              : IETF
Verifying Party     : IESG