IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [TLS] Recommended yes->no for max_fragment_length extension?

Sean Turner <sean@sn3rd.com> Tue, 13 February 2018 23:15 UTC

Return-Path: <sean@sn3rd.com>
X-Original-To: tls@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: tls@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A4B40126D74 for <tls@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 13 Feb 2018 15:15:55 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=sn3rd.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id PgJdSSwnuvFm for <tls@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 13 Feb 2018 15:15:54 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-qt0-x22d.google.com (mail-qt0-x22d.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400d:c0d::22d]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E391B1271DF for <tls@ietf.org>; Tue, 13 Feb 2018 15:15:53 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-qt0-x22d.google.com with SMTP id l9so5377716qtj.9 for <tls@ietf.org>; Tue, 13 Feb 2018 15:15:53 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=sn3rd.com; s=google; h=from:content-transfer-encoding:mime-version:subject:date:references :to:in-reply-to:message-id; bh=44CzsFTdXLlkhFrxGkpmRm82IQPmlo7r1mOc6ljAKzs=; b=GtfOcZp91o8H38pKfN8pFwYFQjF0z9r8L7vK+ML0qtVvpxtEXsjuz5VKcFHqNTsQxS ReFUIPpzGRBbF5Vdr0xyHxxtrDG/TFfOUAg60j6MGf0QvolPcumlZcCkDyyYvpuZoXOx hzIlFdBODdPhlBnm4dNgDxIrgir1lIRbDqIaA=
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:from:content-transfer-encoding:mime-version :subject:date:references:to:in-reply-to:message-id; bh=44CzsFTdXLlkhFrxGkpmRm82IQPmlo7r1mOc6ljAKzs=; b=CHJTt4CtnCbZ3i6YJcJG9k/0iaB9Aeo+b5QGX7iJBXvGHkEo+prn8qVCQ0EeMkkWZl CtfuPlUEH1H9hcxuiiGwFStEmcHjgWaOhraJhU4ggTwlpPdlucsXgZzRiqopnCYC+kIp HL59biNBfUlIWZDCXXBlDne4NHeWgGh4wcnf4dp8JYI/PQnaMSk+gsNVJUHyTLV62fyi JggwNEAXHMZsESSjLgo9aQBUGSIlo1GmDwXkpvZcCN8w6apXKyLuAS50WERnuqELtRRx JOYezsd/Yus5qEN4TkeR+19iACjSLWBuXx5i1I4savCxOek+kmZ4GIE+E6HX+MoviLZQ KJmA==
X-Gm-Message-State: APf1xPAByn9E/1CTplCyREBF3D98dO/IqJKbwdhkJAjQlUJW2oAh0KvH GBxmy+6SdOk9mEfhLU29WoOp5+21qZI=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: AH8x226F1IjR37pYFYMaX1GxA0gRdRIWj4mr3AaEbHIf8ZZf70qYgPULB0vzZWDS1NMbbz7hl00Erg==
X-Received: by 10.200.17.1 with SMTP id c1mr4854632qtj.150.1518563752706; Tue, 13 Feb 2018 15:15:52 -0800 (PST)
Received: from [172.16.0.18] ([96.231.218.194]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id n23sm2169578qtl.39.2018.02.13.15.15.51 for <tls@ietf.org> (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Tue, 13 Feb 2018 15:15:52 -0800 (PST)
From: Sean Turner <sean@sn3rd.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 11.2 \(3445.5.20\))
Date: Tue, 13 Feb 2018 18:15:48 -0500
References: <0BD40460-F194-4A2B-8E7C-4FD2D084111B@sn3rd.com>
To: "<tls@ietf.org>" <tls@ietf.org>
In-Reply-To: <0BD40460-F194-4A2B-8E7C-4FD2D084111B@sn3rd.com>
Message-Id: <A5E32EAE-65CC-4D9F-ADA2-17D32E9B1EFE@sn3rd.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3445.5.20)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/tls/2CKLDVbhdDxdJIn3MvIFcJJm2-U>
Subject: Re: [TLS] Recommended yes->no for max_fragment_length extension?
X-BeenThere: tls@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: "This is the mailing list for the Transport Layer Security working group of the IETF." <tls.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/tls>, <mailto:tls-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/tls/>
List-Post: <mailto:tls@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tls-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tls>, <mailto:tls-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 13 Feb 2018 23:15:56 -0000

Just a reminder ...

> On Feb 7, 2018, at 15:33, Sean Turner <sean@sn3rd.com> wrote:
> 
> All,
> 
> Prior to pushing draft-ietf-tls-record-limit [0] to the IESG, the WG needs to confirm that draft-ietf-tls-record-limit should change max_fragment_length [1] from “Yes” in our soon to be created Recommended column (see [2]) to a “No”.  Please indicate by 2359 UTC on 14 Feb whether you are for or against this change; and if you are against please indicate why.
> 
> spt
> 
> [0] https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-tls-record-limit/
> [1] https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/rfc6066/
> [2] https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-tls-iana-registry-updates/

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email