IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [TLS] RFC 6961 implementations ?

Peter Gutmann <pgut001@cs.auckland.ac.nz> Sat, 16 May 2015 01:56 UTC

Return-Path: <pgut001@cs.auckland.ac.nz>
X-Original-To: tls@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: tls@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id DBED11ACE2B for <tls@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 15 May 2015 18:56:54 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.91
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.91 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id ra0OsCZJKpK3 for <tls@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 15 May 2015 18:56:51 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mx4.auckland.ac.nz (mx4.auckland.ac.nz [130.216.125.248]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 184101ACE25 for <tls@ietf.org>; Fri, 15 May 2015 18:56:50 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=auckland.ac.nz; i=@auckland.ac.nz; q=dns/txt; s=uoa; t=1431741411; x=1463277411; h=from:to:subject:date:message-id: content-transfer-encoding:mime-version; bh=rSZzJAePfyowUjZwlllNtjlVZDmtlLvqzebHG4q9mNY=; b=BYPVV2LV7cAJ7vN1+EN7uyRH7un1hk1ENPHWMDDxFqmejsSPmCvi/V+6 VxsTUodNNhVIpEfg9Kl+E4RDPv7cR1DKfUeXUfZQI3VKIPQd9Nmkpejnu KwPhoDjIph3tLNifV2OH9G7q3EVyXAX/M9Z63B966Nds4oWppE8eYjuND 4=;
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.13,437,1427713200"; d="scan'208";a="7293608"
X-Ironport-HAT: MAIL-SERVERS - $RELAYED
X-Ironport-Source: 130.216.4.106 - Outgoing - Outgoing
Received: from uxchange10-fe2.uoa.auckland.ac.nz ([130.216.4.106]) by mx4-int.auckland.ac.nz with ESMTP/TLS/AES128-SHA; 16 May 2015 13:56:49 +1200
Received: from UXCN10-TDC05.UoA.auckland.ac.nz ([169.254.9.151]) by uxchange10-fe2.UoA.auckland.ac.nz ([130.216.4.106]) with mapi id 14.03.0174.001; Sat, 16 May 2015 13:56:49 +1200
From: Peter Gutmann <pgut001@cs.auckland.ac.nz>
To: "<tls@ietf.org>" <tls@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: [TLS] RFC 6961 implementations ?
Thread-Index: AdCPe5IAG2KgAMvSRUmvJAh7LuBW2g==
Date: Sat, 16 May 2015 01:56:48 +0000
Message-ID: <9A043F3CF02CD34C8E74AC1594475C73AB022161@uxcn10-tdc05.UoA.auckland.ac.nz>
Accept-Language: en-NZ, en-GB, en-US
Content-Language: en-NZ
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [130.216.158.4]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/tls/6aw2ng5sfzMBOn_I560_0wIPU50>
Subject: Re: [TLS] RFC 6961 implementations ?
X-BeenThere: tls@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: "This is the mailing list for the Transport Layer Security working group of the IETF." <tls.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/tls>, <mailto:tls-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/tls/>
List-Post: <mailto:tls@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tls-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tls>, <mailto:tls-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 16 May 2015 01:56:55 -0000

So now I'm curious, why is something that nothing seems to implement and no-
one really seems to care about a standards-track RFC?  Shouldn't it be
experimental?

Peter.

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email