[TLS] RFC 6961 implementations ?

Fabrice Gautier <fabrice.gautier@gmail.com> Fri, 15 May 2015 22:27 UTC

Return-Path: <fabrice.gautier@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: tls@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: tls@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5ECF01A89A7 for <tls@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 15 May 2015 15:27:48 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id zKJBQbtNmam0 for <tls@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 15 May 2015 15:27:47 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-oi0-x235.google.com (mail-oi0-x235.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4003:c06::235]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 056DA1A89A2 for <tls@ietf.org>; Fri, 15 May 2015 15:27:46 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by oica37 with SMTP id a37so93241184oic.0 for <tls@ietf.org>; Fri, 15 May 2015 15:27:46 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to:content-type; bh=u42YD9oRrluE4v5ZwDjvGxML0wKdNLc8RmDkyJmC85s=; b=nIv8k9sjvXWl27wK9SnGOg7FzS17SDadnzsXsk65YXVeykQzSQvt9Do0QpcanJD2bL GSYrlwx/PWlWDybF1IH94VdGJgMi44/0xnElX3eNmLGJXG7Awgukazj3DLclj03x9Xfb XuKgSidoqBQ0opQeopJTq4CI7hfYYejSaPv7CgBM5Tpoh4WvO8lw6csZ9K1oLNXDDkFY 60CsWPMscqI/7IUmKfMI3vtcYcwBtWGLMYt3g8T5SAaGwnzUD0B/K2cKmGdPQ56r6xfx jQufYysoaML3BvzLh3httZTpCacInohpDY3/DyHB7fjpCMORTAtk/29N4lQnCiWDsvoO 1dZA==
X-Received: by 10.202.49.77 with SMTP id x74mr9771303oix.86.1431728866180; Fri, 15 May 2015 15:27:46 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.202.213.206 with HTTP; Fri, 15 May 2015 15:27:25 -0700 (PDT)
From: Fabrice Gautier <fabrice.gautier@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 15 May 2015 15:27:25 -0700
Message-ID: <CANOyrg89ig45hf2PU0Yhn0D93m1BZSqDD4Sx4kxa5_Sy+nWKkQ@mail.gmail.com>
To: "<tls@ietf.org>" <tls@ietf.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/tls/pgVVnGxwHRhrIsHsTi5v7D4i_6w>
Subject: [TLS] RFC 6961 implementations ?
X-BeenThere: tls@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: "This is the mailing list for the Transport Layer Security working group of the IETF." <tls.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/tls>, <mailto:tls-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/tls/>
List-Post: <mailto:tls@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tls-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tls>, <mailto:tls-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 15 May 2015 22:27:48 -0000

Hi,

Does anyone knows of existing (or planned) implementations of RFC 6961
(Multiple Certificate Status Request Extension)*, either on the client
or server side ?

I haven't seen support in the usual suspects...


Thanks.


(*) https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc6961



-- Fabrice