Re: [TLS] Mentioning DTLS

On 3/16/2014 2:21 PM, Stephen Farrell wrote:
>
> On 03/16/2014 05:44 PM, Michael StJohns wrote:
>> On 3/15/2014 8:47 PM, Stephen Farrell wrote:
>>> So assuming nobody finds a problem with the erratum
>>> (and I remember;-) I'll mark it approved in a day or
>>> so.
>>>
>>> S
>> While this is a valid errata submission, reading
>> https://www.ietf.org/iesg/statement/errata-processing.html - guideline 7
>> suggests
>> that since this was present all the way back in 2006 and not fixed in
>> this version, what the IESG is going to do is mark it as Hold for
>> Document Update.   And we really should be implementing what's been
>> written down, rather than writing down what's been implemented - at
>> least for RFCs!
> I'll take that as someone claiming there's a problem then
> and wait on the chairs to tell me what they figure the WG
> consensus is on processing this.

Hi Stephen -

Wasn't objecting, just pointing out that the IESG may end up requiring 
an RFC to fix this and that we should be prepared for that.

Later, Mike

>
> S.
>
>
>> Mike
>>
>>
>>> On 03/14/2014 10:25 PM, Eric Rescorla wrote:
>>>> Martin R, thanks for pointing this out. Good catch.
>>>>
>>>> Martin T, thanks for the errata!
>>>>
>>>> -Ekr
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On Fri, Mar 14, 2014 at 3:11 PM, Martin Thomson
>>>> <martin.thomson@gmail.com>wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> On 14 March 2014 14:10, Martin Thomson <martin.thomson@gmail.com>
>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>> On 14 March 2014 14:04, Martin Rex <mrex@sap.com> wrote:
>>>>>>> NEITHER of the two official DTLS specifications of the IETF does
>>>>>>> support
>>>>>>> TLS extensions.
>>>>>> I don't know how you came to that conclusion.  The definition of
>>>>>> ClientHello is inherited from the corresponding TLS specification,
>>>>>> isn't it?
>>>>> I see what the problem is now.  It looks like 6347 and co have opted
>>>>> to omit the extensions.  Most implementations I know of support
>>>>> extension, even though this was omitted.  Erratum on 6347 filed (4347
>>>>> is obsolete, so I'm not going to bother with it).
>>>>>
>>>>> http://www.rfc-editor.org/errata_search.php?rfc=6347&eid=3917
>>>>>
>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>> TLS mailing list
>>>>> TLS@ietf.org
>>>>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tls
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> TLS mailing list
>>>> TLS@ietf.org
>>>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tls
>>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> TLS mailing list
>>> TLS@ietf.org
>>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tls
>>>
>>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> TLS mailing list
>> TLS@ietf.org
>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tls
>>
>>
>