Re: [TLS] Mentioning DTLS

So assuming nobody finds a problem with the erratum
(and I remember;-) I'll mark it approved in a day or
so.

S

On 03/14/2014 10:25 PM, Eric Rescorla wrote:
> Martin R, thanks for pointing this out. Good catch.
> 
> Martin T, thanks for the errata!
> 
> -Ekr
> 
> 
> 
> On Fri, Mar 14, 2014 at 3:11 PM, Martin Thomson <martin.thomson@gmail.com>wrote:
> 
>> On 14 March 2014 14:10, Martin Thomson <martin.thomson@gmail.com> wrote:
>>> On 14 March 2014 14:04, Martin Rex <mrex@sap.com> wrote:
>>>> NEITHER of the two official DTLS specifications of the IETF does support
>>>> TLS extensions.
>>>
>>> I don't know how you came to that conclusion.  The definition of
>>> ClientHello is inherited from the corresponding TLS specification,
>>> isn't it?
>>
>> I see what the problem is now.  It looks like 6347 and co have opted
>> to omit the extensions.  Most implementations I know of support
>> extension, even though this was omitted.  Erratum on 6347 filed (4347
>> is obsolete, so I'm not going to bother with it).
>>
>> http://www.rfc-editor.org/errata_search.php?rfc=6347&eid=3917
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> TLS mailing list
>> TLS@ietf.org
>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tls
>>
> 
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> TLS mailing list
> TLS@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tls
> 