Re: [TLS] [Editorial Errata Reported] RFC8996 (6492)

[Benjamin Kaduk <[e-mail]>]

Agreed on all counts.

RFC Editor, this phrase appears twice in Section 1.1 -- do you know if the
inline errata tooling will do something useful with the Original/Corrected
text as currently shown, or should I extract a larger snippet so that both
instances can be done together?

Thanks,

Ben

On Tue, Mar 23, 2021 at 03:03:14PM -0700, RFC Errata System wrote:
> The following errata report has been submitted for RFC8996,
> "Deprecating TLS 1.0 and TLS 1.1".
> 
> --------------------------------------
> You may review the report below and at:
> https://www.rfc-editor.org/errata/eid6492
> 
> --------------------------------------
> Type: Editorial
> Reported by: Martin Thomson <[e-mail]>
> 
> Section: 1.1
> 
> Original Text
> -------------
> ServerHello.Random
> 
> Corrected Text
> --------------
> ServerHello.random 
> 
> Notes
> -----
> Very pedantic, but RFC 8446 uses all lowercase for "random" to match the grammar.
> 
> Instructions:
> -------------
> This erratum is currently posted as "Reported". If necessary, please
> use "Reply All" to discuss whether it should be verified or
> rejected. When a decision is reached, the verifying party  
> can log in to change the status and edit the report, if necessary. 
> 
> --------------------------------------
> RFC8996 (draft-ietf-tls-oldversions-deprecate-12)
> --------------------------------------
> Title               : Deprecating TLS 1.0 and TLS 1.1
> Publication Date    : March 2021
> Author(s)           : K. Moriarty, S. Farrell
> Category            : BEST CURRENT PRACTICE
> Source              : Transport Layer Security
> Area                : Security
> Stream              : IETF
> Verifying Party     : IESG