[TLS] TLS Opaque
Joseph Salowey <joe@salowey.net> Wed, 31 March 2021 04:39 UTC
Return-Path: <joe@salowey.net>
X-Original-To: tls@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: tls@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E13443A189A for <tls@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 30 Mar 2021 21:39:08 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.898
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.898 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=salowey-net.20150623.gappssmtp.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id OgfFPj0QJn2r for <tls@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 30 Mar 2021 21:39:06 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-lf1-x12e.google.com (mail-lf1-x12e.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::12e]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 79ED73A1899 for <tls@ietf.org>; Tue, 30 Mar 2021 21:39:06 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-lf1-x12e.google.com with SMTP id b14so27146970lfv.8 for <tls@ietf.org>; Tue, 30 Mar 2021 21:39:06 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=salowey-net.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=04UmRRU0+3tS5Yz+M7MbqLY3hFreZ4zhQY/FGPd5WVc=; b=d158PinW3zV3hdVkFrtWCon+XxBxwaaD+cME+i3pNGFCRMMMraafTeZ9WHTrG/CS4T fVhTF2pIbm7x6F2lD33w3N83aqxENm80JWWbUSgvGTUiQdqGASCV10qCk0UJfeeuq+WS y5EIucDkS0c4eGSr1L8gBNJKFSs0cpCtkTv7/VOCy/b5c/WKh1Tih8+2SWaUi68NYz4U lK0UyAxDj5SZfK4AltsCP98HukX+j9lxDjfO5poTnd/MNBl+5ayU7sfh64tJbSVwbSx1 aRUpfVHsHUjZVlSTWzWVU/jmXX97Y7fcyqTVjEXD3ZE5tLTlcfdPq9uj4dzqbOtvuVik /tSw==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=04UmRRU0+3tS5Yz+M7MbqLY3hFreZ4zhQY/FGPd5WVc=; b=Wjl8Qcvt4aDn8nmqXvdVZXvZlWWJ7gSPF0CduiDX5vqZplQsLqBUEz1h537TMkqMJF Qy8SKVJgcqFMR45kbwIilH67+Kag+wqp6tCYwvCbmTpw4tVEVznwCv+w16cJS8onOveX 0Oke3RyxZEQUoEIIUYJZVxdQQevMwqOhEzOdQmNFmwFEtwNEbyFJXKt9EV1tVNYAyUW5 KE/xBYNeP+MsQK3xxIepekWZa1E5my7niSgKEIXsCCz+PU8EY29gkzASLTb77HxqFoYZ rrfbzcLkpZ2j1lSCvyzENizraPawTkviUnPexWJXS6i1ajhxKtBXxtZzXR+Q6UMbfPA3 gpxA==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM533JkTghCtkYMvP8p3bsTddul+NlNEnnGNBe0P0dIYcAvpRxH7Ms Ask5h6KD63lEE7rozWY6KVyYFg0sbtJyTJZVo07ZtotMn5+U+Q==
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJxraelkLzURNczIs9LoWqy0tZqvXynX/zxhNZsYd7XW8l/NUCXNgF0xDcrqGYhAv5OiI5Y27VolGhwI7hVyLiM=
X-Received: by 2002:ac2:5dcf:: with SMTP id x15mr982583lfq.176.1617165542900; Tue, 30 Mar 2021 21:39:02 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
From: Joseph Salowey <joe@salowey.net>
Date: Tue, 30 Mar 2021 21:38:52 -0700
Message-ID: <CAOgPGoBVgnD=s7+DTxsYibvDwe6njJJE=ioeTwxqgSAyF_gEBw@mail.gmail.com>
To: "<tls@ietf.org>" <tls@ietf.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="000000000000ba551705becdb10e"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/tls/CcHnQhVWkS7riKwV0XghpMe9ALg>
Subject: [TLS] TLS Opaque
X-BeenThere: tls@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "This is the mailing list for the Transport Layer Security working group of the IETF." <tls.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/tls>, <mailto:tls-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/tls/>
List-Post: <mailto:tls@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tls-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tls>, <mailto:tls-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 31 Mar 2021 04:39:09 -0000
Hi Folks, We had a presentation on TLS opaque at IETF 110, but we have not had much discussion of this document on the list. The chairs would like to see more discussion on the document before considering it for adoption. There is at least one question on the list that has gone unanswered for some time [1]. Cheers, Joe, Sean, and Chris [1] https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/tls/yCBYp10QuYPSu5zOoM3v84SAIZE/
- [TLS] TLS Opaque Joseph Salowey
- Re: [TLS] TLS Opaque Hao, Feng
- Re: [TLS] TLS Opaque Salz, Rich
- Re: [TLS] TLS Opaque Blumenthal, Uri - 0553 - MITLL
- Re: [TLS] TLS Opaque Rob Sayre
- Re: [TLS] TLS Opaque Watson Ladd
- Re: [TLS] TLS Opaque Scott Fluhrer (sfluhrer)
- Re: [TLS] TLS Opaque Rob Sayre
- Re: [TLS] TLS Opaque Hugo Krawczyk