IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [TLS] Confirming Consensus: Negotiating upper layer protocols

Adam Langley <agl@google.com> Thu, 07 February 2013 23:31 UTC

Return-Path: <agl@google.com>
X-Original-To: tls@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: tls@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A0CB921F8939 for <tls@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 7 Feb 2013 15:31:19 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -101.978
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-101.978 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, FM_FORGED_GMAIL=0.622, NO_RELAYS=-0.001, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id gYkpWyF+gkGo for <tls@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 7 Feb 2013 15:31:19 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-ia0-x231.google.com (ia-in-x0231.1e100.net [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4001:c02::231]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 77D7F21F8938 for <tls@ietf.org>; Thu, 7 Feb 2013 15:31:15 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-ia0-f177.google.com with SMTP id h8so3572798iaa.36 for <tls@ietf.org>; Thu, 07 Feb 2013 15:31:15 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:x-received:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id :subject:from:to:cc:content-type; bh=rhYrjNu0pBUBmzp6FLLPkNFeKDd0/kgfh08nGLY10fY=; b=JfanjybQuMyXwt2inZ1KTZfa233Ss3QjHEA5FSEWl+9yhSt8D054aXjiF3HR59FlDl wyuDGhlPFZZ/Bv9SixgMPCsChhEDJV1VjzP4IPXWC1/yZYGe9N9hT0+DwrQtKsTI1lgj Wnhdtl7KAlBYdICJhJ0AxLN4QT9GL30W4u++Kx1wRd8troANO3U9C52nG9hSXCGeqSqT 9IWUjPwLWLdQy5xKSiywlWmSIDqPfLJw84IBtMaamhZot/rjiG3DrYn/IZLGsA+pCxRw 4HZbM86SeX9duIj7hJORQfOyNNQ+8AYwiOxBkPJoT5cLe8RLH4+oY2aeSnXrbXMG4GAM 2kbw==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:x-received:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id :subject:from:to:cc:content-type:x-gm-message-state; bh=rhYrjNu0pBUBmzp6FLLPkNFeKDd0/kgfh08nGLY10fY=; b=bbRJB7fixp+9HWJVdyMhEiwP+Jb9GB9+j1MOcj0h0Ao+Zm4nDYjfroLRadc7RY/+Te wghBUywSlTU/C73kR1a00pz2MGyXRIpiaT5qV3iPzm+RqzYvAKaTNnjdwkzen70e/QRz cqZoEis0PhAP/BFBBap4joMUkvhhXE3MdBWvHn0NYgSbIO3h3nOaQlLVUO9KO3lOiD3x Y7SxO+xEuo8s2NpvP/s/Hd4vfNFewvPJXHaf/5J0l4nPmOUs2F+GZJ4zgeTY4KQfmqYy klKtSDIIkiUTjMasj2ayL8L+eET/KTjG1TkE+Zi7xRrxr7PRMZLLMuNRwvJ3INwZn5D2 Q+Pg==
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.50.184.164 with SMTP id ev4mr18180873igc.91.1360279874905; Thu, 07 Feb 2013 15:31:14 -0800 (PST)
Received: by 10.231.241.201 with HTTP; Thu, 7 Feb 2013 15:31:14 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <CABcZeBM4Sor1oHQ15KtH=K=B3OUxaDUpfgS7=oHLHWeQpPngsQ@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CABcZeBM4Sor1oHQ15KtH=K=B3OUxaDUpfgS7=oHLHWeQpPngsQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 07 Feb 2013 18:31:14 -0500
Message-ID: <CAL9PXLzdfDM-J_1W+iCf=z4ey+qC8yuh3etmYAETTsQNTd4YUQ@mail.gmail.com>
From: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
To: Eric Rescorla <ekr@rtfm.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQnm8ZxZgxNi3xBiYQm864XBkveG7BE0nrMNRA4J2BNAy5Z4LTTqR3tqJ4jEHvm4fVHZqDW7T21nlK83WymqLkYuow4TYqQlxN2EeUc8VH5QC+Uk4oqEmkpEuA4TAxELYsivHa6AjTSHQ4nMzsPf4zIPz2t8/HjUdQ6ykSH+JA72Y8D5408m2WTPo2DOsYftya7C3W+J
Cc: "tls@ietf.org" <tls@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [TLS] Confirming Consensus: Negotiating upper layer protocols
X-BeenThere: tls@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: "This is the mailing list for the Transport Layer Security working group of the IETF." <tls.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/tls>, <mailto:tls-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/tls>
List-Post: <mailto:tls@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tls-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tls>, <mailto:tls-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 07 Feb 2013 23:31:19 -0000

On Thu, Feb 7, 2013 at 6:28 PM, Eric Rescorla <ekr@rtfm.com> wrote:
> WG members, please provide any comments on whether we should
> take this work on by February 21.

Unsurprisingly, perhaps, I support the WG taking this work on.


Cheers

AGL

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email