IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [TLS] Adoption call for TLS Flag - Request mTLS

Eric Rescorla <ekr@rtfm.com> Wed, 03 April 2024 00:08 UTC

Return-Path: <ekr@rtfm.com>
X-Original-To: tls@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: tls@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id F2EE7C14CE4A for <tls@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 2 Apr 2024 17:08:44 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.893
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.893 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_NONE=0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001, URIBL_DBL_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, URIBL_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001] autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=rtfm-com.20230601.gappssmtp.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 496ve7WkPiNt for <tls@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 2 Apr 2024 17:08:42 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-yw1-x112e.google.com (mail-yw1-x112e.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::112e]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (128/128 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 44823C14F689 for <tls@ietf.org>; Tue, 2 Apr 2024 17:08:42 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-yw1-x112e.google.com with SMTP id 00721157ae682-61524d10f86so13600167b3.3 for <tls@ietf.org>; Tue, 02 Apr 2024 17:08:42 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=rtfm-com.20230601.gappssmtp.com; s=20230601; t=1712102921; x=1712707721; darn=ietf.org; h=cc:to:subject:message-id:date:from:in-reply-to:references :mime-version:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=LvoBXpvFzXfmK6U6dq3ZjAv7rqAedOQdyMfG3p+gveU=; b=B2st1DVWWk9ejJBasVtbfEDu1fz/aujZM/otEUDB6n7dEk5qe/jmEKWFbVwOQX5xZ9 +LWkYU9R5I7fzr+A0wmXngGUnA/BzuI7/AsuFwi4s91vkjW/rIb4qCbsvzbx9b9Upunf hGkKslUj1xJz05qBi05uMJhkPPZh7jPYhA4e9E97pcUtiVDLDglLoIL4V9ukTfWO1xfy d379UTM1VsBnTaODAJKwGszYlouo63g03co/iT5XwaxLKt5IF1oMWAlpD3NJgLPm5VTW OaGV7Ye0AAwvyyxmqoU6ncFR0o2efColtBJ0DYCLYz+lKI+Ji0nyv+uHqcrdqa9dtXdH pHdQ==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20230601; t=1712102921; x=1712707721; h=cc:to:subject:message-id:date:from:in-reply-to:references :mime-version:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id :reply-to; bh=LvoBXpvFzXfmK6U6dq3ZjAv7rqAedOQdyMfG3p+gveU=; b=OzuXuX/6mSzbMEveCYQJiDA7zBxv0dThFjm8i2/SDSRXkc2U98NPD5KGc8BWBxSV7Q FJPOEkWZbuQqkoCUf/hWU8of2Ujj4gG06fVn21YZ8xlnLS+OnxqNKmQO8MaV2nyfEDZo hMfNDoijtsrmoUwWj+NN3kkmfNeEdR34nIikCsJzeyDaLgJ99swbt/CsA5ltRzL4ZieO rX2m9Pf8qO+fYx27vNrM6jUFczehG4J9w5WNDbrpMqmXXOQi+QyRdAZG8u/dbA/uG333 Ak2btrxAkdHNXyKsNqyT2QnJV3Rt8T8we27kBHcLcxT4AheiffKyaCBHISl/IJQnJ0cU Lo8g==
X-Forwarded-Encrypted: i=1; AJvYcCX1UxQpwRWCSFxhq11gB5wYya6rUTR2GYWY35lQSO8iK3F4X7z82qCciBhWUo1BFxJ8JZB1sWGY4SE1X1A=
X-Gm-Message-State: AOJu0YyT/TxcRfPzlaej3yUleGZF4OSnIP+zniLyQYxB1Q+J8Ra+OcCh ajCn2J/LUlgdOaRP4lCIiWYbdTJttpbjIDg5dUck9Xukfmwhk18VqSr4o1k7btTLn6YTQTw4rm/ Ywhtwm8DmP02OZjfl/Rmb5oljv6+QQGRLdggP25qOAVPFk5e03N8=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGHT+IF0sRBF8ISiYWMgFJhplyUsB3dWe3139MLIAMXBETktSU2zPuIs+MRAOH1g7ffPySKujUmx8NzfT8AvXIPn55o=
X-Received: by 2002:a05:690c:3749:b0:615:31a9:69bc with SMTP id fw9-20020a05690c374900b0061531a969bcmr2907147ywb.9.1712102920991; Tue, 02 Apr 2024 17:08:40 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <8957179A-14D2-4947-B196-B68988B0E3CA@sn3rd.com> <CAG2Zi20wUSFMFUiySQMoM08hpvLY3eLe_F8sWDG+F7T7=E0SOw@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAG2Zi20wUSFMFUiySQMoM08hpvLY3eLe_F8sWDG+F7T7=E0SOw@mail.gmail.com>
From: Eric Rescorla <ekr@rtfm.com>
Date: Tue, 02 Apr 2024 17:08:04 -0700
Message-ID: <CABcZeBPgmrDo37sRpRos6pFkeoG6QjMGeLhYkpXCHsEw7GCtYQ@mail.gmail.com>
To: Christopher Patton <cpatton=40cloudflare.com@dmarc.ietf.org>
Cc: Sean Turner <sean@sn3rd.com>, TLS List <tls@ietf.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="0000000000006cd48006152606e1"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/tls/BVZVJI871zMdOB0o0oTeRKZvaSI>
Subject: Re: [TLS] Adoption call for TLS Flag - Request mTLS
X-BeenThere: tls@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.39
Precedence: list
List-Id: "This is the mailing list for the Transport Layer Security working group of the IETF." <tls.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/tls>, <mailto:tls-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/tls/>
List-Post: <mailto:tls@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tls-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tls>, <mailto:tls-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 03 Apr 2024 00:08:45 -0000

Adoption should not be required to register a code point [0], as the policy
is Specification Required.

I'm mildly negative on adopting this document. What is the reason we need
to spend WG time on this, rather than just having a code point assignment?

-Ekr

[0] As an aside the IANA considerations of draft-ietf-tls-tlsflags-13
should clearly have
a policy which matches 8447 S 7, which is to say that an I-D is sufficient.


On Tue, Apr 2, 2024 at 12:59 PM Christopher Patton <cpatton=
40cloudflare.com@dmarc.ietf.org> wrote:

> I'd like to see this problem solved. There was some discussion about
> whether an I-D is needed or all we needed was to register a code point
> somewhere. If most agree that an I-D is needed, then let's adopt it. I'm
> happy to review.
>
> Chris P.
>
> On Tue, Apr 2, 2024 at 12:22 PM Sean Turner <sean@sn3rd.com> wrote:
>
>> At the IETF 119 TLS session there was some interest in the mTLS Flag I-D (
>> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-jhoyla-req-mtls-flag/); also, see
>> previous list discussions at [0]. This message is to judge consensus on
>> whether there is sufficient support to adopt this I-D.  If you support
>> adoption and are willing to review and contribute text, please send a
>> message to the list.  If you do not support adoption of this I-D, please
>> send a message to the list and indicate why.  This call will close on 16
>> April 2024.
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Deirdre, Joe, and Sean
>>
>> [0]
>> https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/tls/9e2S95H9YgtHp5HhqdlNqmQP0_w/
>> _______________________________________________
>> TLS mailing list
>> TLS@ietf.org
>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tls
>>
> _______________________________________________
> TLS mailing list
> TLS@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tls
>

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email