IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [TLS] Adoption call for TLS Flag - Request mTLS

Watson Ladd <watsonbladd@gmail.com> Wed, 03 April 2024 05:36 UTC

Return-Path: <watsonbladd@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: tls@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: tls@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 19186C14F6B8 for <tls@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 2 Apr 2024 22:36:56 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.094
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.094 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001, URIBL_DBL_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, URIBL_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id z-1NpWXtcf86 for <tls@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 2 Apr 2024 22:36:55 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-wm1-x332.google.com (mail-wm1-x332.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::332]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (128/128 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 73054C14F60E for <tls@ietf.org>; Tue, 2 Apr 2024 22:36:55 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-wm1-x332.google.com with SMTP id 5b1f17b1804b1-4161eb1aeaaso6418765e9.0 for <tls@ietf.org>; Tue, 02 Apr 2024 22:36:55 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20230601; t=1712122613; x=1712727413; darn=ietf.org; h=cc:to:subject:message-id:date:from:in-reply-to:references :mime-version:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=08llisw7T7q93M8GBjemryM2heamB+8LHDXmpBuiyVw=; b=CFhP8tq6mtWltj/Dv0GgRPmW2U4dhTKDdy+xnCAAwL+q/Por0q7aQ2GC+NBbC9doiL CQVIVESQCrWCk/Fl1hvFn9fZeQB3gqgWAQCcOUXds7o+bn2wUGZkiitFYbYBDuGMo5+x 9kmBvLbNhthQvl9q7TtWa1p0Dn+eU2q8Yo/Gyp7fHjda+WtkyWOpGHJCqij0/XwuVkWI SLYteBH5oG9EF7H9yHFh8FaRU+1eZRdEivukWFXsQfb7ZK1cgUJwQXycsU94SzkK/5eV 6g39Yo0XotwcMdAp4xjcxhH/kn22qDszL4gfMRfpZP4plN0caJgGv8D75uzwuxN1FBrt SS1g==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20230601; t=1712122613; x=1712727413; h=cc:to:subject:message-id:date:from:in-reply-to:references :mime-version:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id :reply-to; bh=08llisw7T7q93M8GBjemryM2heamB+8LHDXmpBuiyVw=; b=ZoToMeHs4Z0MOXaIm/kz/SE1YuXqkKZ9iu3N72yz9Icr+v0hlpT5l6630zsZdKo9IZ 9+3vKj8SGWDJ0vRtMYvBnpYNwi4w2BbhZz4W/lxtQjPHoXhvdudrn1NXzMb63YXgJhVl iH1H4U8BWp1VY0Y26yQZoCKgEiv8Lqm1vdQP301Ms02Q7B7p42i0ip6QyKLNhiiOL65g 1/eFBCXpSs7Hcm7QEF2wV1tCrr+dbBeaEhtuWWhPpeL1OgWVXOslqOoYmCI+yTTldE81 C9+K0CdJfrOrPMaM+E+WI7imayU5Lqv2I+iOfLToHM2Mml3dFIJVsKI0hlmhMO9BJw08 vKYg==
X-Forwarded-Encrypted: i=1; AJvYcCWgY1TlQlPKlVxdAYN8Gk8qmdWOc59447DMKaYNATFi4i80LF4D9wr7WlbxyPNfC1R5GizajBRHy8gro5Y=
X-Gm-Message-State: AOJu0Yxv18IY88+5uBKo7FbclhncPhb2EdiaF87eSt+wxY2lIvqJX532 W8eZubtaM9vbFWZ7ASPuQoIBZcd+5BkY4ZE5sL4QZCkBmd7S+veJBO7trp3qi4TmptmMWhbZJ37 8dYMrG+RZ+cqnV4HqehH29MhYEJDrvOZq
X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGHT+IHNbVQzDQW9sTD/iJhxoFT/+VfYcX8ClFrCUBIY90GmrGBg72CoMTpy/jTSZUZjAE3vXrx3NS8OnF2JNaUjQAc=
X-Received: by 2002:a5d:624d:0:b0:341:bd4c:f075 with SMTP id m13-20020a5d624d000000b00341bd4cf075mr8966303wrv.16.1712122613152; Tue, 02 Apr 2024 22:36:53 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <8957179A-14D2-4947-B196-B68988B0E3CA@sn3rd.com> <CAG2Zi20wUSFMFUiySQMoM08hpvLY3eLe_F8sWDG+F7T7=E0SOw@mail.gmail.com> <CABcZeBPgmrDo37sRpRos6pFkeoG6QjMGeLhYkpXCHsEw7GCtYQ@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CABcZeBPgmrDo37sRpRos6pFkeoG6QjMGeLhYkpXCHsEw7GCtYQ@mail.gmail.com>
From: Watson Ladd <watsonbladd@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 02 Apr 2024 22:36:41 -0700
Message-ID: <CACsn0cmP9_2zufm0dmgkQJkpwn=b7Y2cZ13N_zDfhggLYunMRQ@mail.gmail.com>
To: Eric Rescorla <ekr@rtfm.com>
Cc: Christopher Patton <cpatton=40cloudflare.com@dmarc.ietf.org>, TLS List <tls@ietf.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="0000000000002b42d806152a9cde"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/tls/aa1LUlIDrQOwLWJYNYJntCiGZOM>
Subject: Re: [TLS] Adoption call for TLS Flag - Request mTLS
X-BeenThere: tls@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.39
Precedence: list
List-Id: "This is the mailing list for the Transport Layer Security working group of the IETF." <tls.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/tls>, <mailto:tls-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/tls/>
List-Post: <mailto:tls@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tls-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tls>, <mailto:tls-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 03 Apr 2024 05:36:56 -0000

On Tue, Apr 2, 2024, 5:08 PM Eric Rescorla <ekr@rtfm.com> wrote:

> Adoption should not be required to register a code point [0], as the
> policy is Specification Required.
>
> I'm mildly negative on adopting this document. What is the reason we need
> to spend WG time on this, rather than just having a code point assignment?
>

Well, don't we want to say how this is supposed to work somewhere? I doubt
this will take much time.

>
> -Ekr
>
> [0] As an aside the IANA considerations of draft-ietf-tls-tlsflags-13
> should clearly have
> a policy which matches 8447 S 7, which is to say that an I-D is sufficient.
>
>
> On Tue, Apr 2, 2024 at 12:59 PM Christopher Patton <cpatton=
> 40cloudflare.com@dmarc.ietf.org> wrote:
>
>> I'd like to see this problem solved. There was some discussion about
>> whether an I-D is needed or all we needed was to register a code point
>> somewhere. If most agree that an I-D is needed, then let's adopt it. I'm
>> happy to review.
>>
>> Chris P.
>>
>> On Tue, Apr 2, 2024 at 12:22 PM Sean Turner <sean@sn3rd.com> wrote:
>>
>>> At the IETF 119 TLS session there was some interest in the mTLS Flag I-D
>>> (https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-jhoyla-req-mtls-flag/); also,
>>> see previous list discussions at [0]. This message is to judge consensus on
>>> whether there is sufficient support to adopt this I-D.  If you support
>>> adoption and are willing to review and contribute text, please send a
>>> message to the list.  If you do not support adoption of this I-D, please
>>> send a message to the list and indicate why.  This call will close on 16
>>> April 2024.
>>>
>>> Thanks,
>>> Deirdre, Joe, and Sean
>>>
>>> [0]
>>> https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/tls/9e2S95H9YgtHp5HhqdlNqmQP0_w/
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> TLS mailing list
>>> TLS@ietf.org
>>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tls
>>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> TLS mailing list
>> TLS@ietf.org
>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tls
>>
> _______________________________________________
> TLS mailing list
> TLS@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tls
>

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email