IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [TLS] analysis of wider impact of TLS1.3 replayabe data

"Salz, Rich" <rsalz@akamai.com> Sun, 13 March 2016 16:45 UTC

Return-Path: <rsalz@akamai.com>
X-Original-To: tls@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: tls@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0DAA912D673 for <tls@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 13 Mar 2016 09:45:44 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.702
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.702 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=akamai.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id aIReo7FDYuRN for <tls@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 13 Mar 2016 09:45:42 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from prod-mail-xrelay07.akamai.com (prod-mail-xrelay07.akamai.com [23.79.238.175]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2E44812D670 for <tls@ietf.org>; Sun, 13 Mar 2016 09:45:42 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from prod-mail-xrelay07.akamai.com (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by postfix.imss70 (Postfix) with ESMTP id 390B4433408; Sun, 13 Mar 2016 16:45:41 +0000 (GMT)
Received: from prod-mail-relay11.akamai.com (prod-mail-relay11.akamai.com [172.27.118.250]) by prod-mail-xrelay07.akamai.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 09DC1433406; Sun, 13 Mar 2016 16:45:41 +0000 (GMT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=akamai.com; s=a1; t=1457887541; bh=0Y77GQ28PISTe52yiTm1xXAd7dyyqZrnqxbiKWup6Oo=; l=253; h=From:To:CC:Date:References:In-Reply-To:From; b=UjC1HYrAPb2oAsts8eSU5hbfCtOrHRFEevTDdjxr+mQs0jBYoeD9q1ry2bjF8MtoX q9ksAfXWRfgncAY/ivL3TzFegdTSzZuzOwyCxz5fLOflO7DJ0KGHZ18kYKjjJAlUI4 vHUk/DyYKIk3tJ8bKeeVZtWeESqGL0W8yDSStJQk=
Received: from email.msg.corp.akamai.com (usma1ex-cas1.msg.corp.akamai.com [172.27.123.30]) by prod-mail-relay11.akamai.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E73B01FC8B; Sun, 13 Mar 2016 16:45:40 +0000 (GMT)
Received: from USMA1EX-EXJRNL1.msg.corp.akamai.com (172.27.123.99) by usma1ex-dag1mb2.msg.corp.akamai.com (172.27.123.102) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1130.7; Sun, 13 Mar 2016 12:45:40 -0400
Received: from USMA1EX-DAG1MB1.msg.corp.akamai.com (172.27.123.101) by USMA1EX-EXJRNL1.msg.corp.akamai.com (172.27.123.99) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1130.7; Sun, 13 Mar 2016 12:45:40 -0400
Received: from USMA1EX-DAG1MB1.msg.corp.akamai.com ([172.27.123.101]) by usma1ex-dag1mb1.msg.corp.akamai.com ([172.27.123.101]) with mapi id 15.00.1130.005; Sun, 13 Mar 2016 12:45:40 -0400
From: "Salz, Rich" <rsalz@akamai.com>
To: Kurt Roeckx <kurt@roeckx.be>, Yoav Nir <ynir.ietf@gmail.com>
Thread-Topic: [TLS] analysis of wider impact of TLS1.3 replayabe data
Thread-Index: AQHRfRmCOC9+j35tnUyBsRmmKhu5h59XkzmAgAAUkgCAAALeAIAACvyA//+9NBCAAEXAgIAAFquA///F9vA=
Date: Sun, 13 Mar 2016 16:45:39 +0000
Message-ID: <61084b20f9e747fc9bae646a75370933@usma1ex-dag1mb1.msg.corp.akamai.com>
References: <56E54B85.4050204@cs.tcd.ie> <CABcZeBNTEB4FxSN=rCZBE02UMn1kDRh83Qob5K2Yf9JTdCQP9A@mail.gmail.com> <56E5706C.4020804@cs.tcd.ie> <CABcZeBMmWG-+eN8W_0TqgtM53x8ZhK-=5TfqFpbJDx9dZGGUmw@mail.gmail.com> <56E57C0B.50802@cs.tcd.ie> <161d625768e74a519b5d820c674d00d9@usma1ex-dag1mb1.msg.corp.akamai.com> <833DCAA1-5730-4EDD-AC17-1FEFD580B922@gmail.com> <20160313161256.GA4749@roeckx.be>
In-Reply-To: <20160313161256.GA4749@roeckx.be>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-ms-exchange-transport-fromentityheader: Hosted
x-originating-ip: [172.19.42.163]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="Windows-1252"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/tls/Cjdd6WZCpBo5XUiBbM6X42hjmoo>
Cc: "tls@ietf.org" <tls@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [TLS] analysis of wider impact of TLS1.3 replayabe data
X-BeenThere: tls@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: "This is the mailing list for the Transport Layer Security working group of the IETF." <tls.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/tls>, <mailto:tls-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/tls/>
List-Post: <mailto:tls@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tls-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tls>, <mailto:tls-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 13 Mar 2016 16:45:44 -0000

> Personally, I think we should start without 0 RTT until we have a better
> understanding of what the consequences are.

For those who don't know, Kurt is on the openssl-dev team (longer than me), but is just more quiet and modest about it :)

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email