Re: [TLS] draft-green-tls-static-dh-in-tls13-01

"Salz, Rich" <rsalz@akamai.com> Fri, 07 July 2017 17:17 UTC

Return-Path: <rsalz@akamai.com>
X-Original-To: tls@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: tls@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1E783131726 for <tls@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 7 Jul 2017 10:17:03 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=akamai.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id jKuTVYyFbcMv for <tls@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 7 Jul 2017 10:17:01 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mx0a-00190b01.pphosted.com (mx0a-00190b01.pphosted.com [IPv6:2620:100:9001:583::1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A1A7D13164A for <tls@ietf.org>; Fri, 7 Jul 2017 10:17:01 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from pps.filterd (m0050095.ppops.net [127.0.0.1]) by m0050095.ppops.net-00190b01. (8.16.0.21/8.16.0.21) with SMTP id v67HCA6G023210; Fri, 7 Jul 2017 18:16:59 +0100
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=akamai.com; h=from : to : cc : subject : date : message-id : references : in-reply-to : content-type : mime-version; s=jan2016.eng; bh=RdwjWV1ZULMsOlgGQ5BQTahT5kTV0JnhDXItzkB40ZA=; b=OfloilLLJ14SPe8rdpOkr1pxvtcyKpo+6zsZloJN33UZulXDT60T1NrmaSogJ2Qf3n8n iXpSALAnFySLAHa589YMvjRskKqAvEJ2FP7RTLelt5Zc0iweVxGM7QlhLMn2H4VQgMfY RsNl+U1nYdRuT7AmgJ+8qPaxx/+uGJk6rU8oOb92ZWHW8sdxNWE1EycCHUjgzDtVnoka 5oxydbb/O1BfcTzTmgzvkfuiCH0zRho1vCrI6QK+cTRPOGz4FZyXRds9WDq5tg15AGjD 1UTY+mwPVOni6jYBAe3eoBXAn7wj7IIUGo6RTahagHR2NS8IqdC2TTuOWk+WiDOh3GuJ yg==
Received: from prod-mail-ppoint2 (a184-51-33-19.deploy.static.akamaitechnologies.com [184.51.33.19] (may be forged)) by m0050095.ppops.net-00190b01. with ESMTP id 2bj21kanqn-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Fri, 07 Jul 2017 18:16:59 +0100
Received: from pps.filterd (prod-mail-ppoint2.akamai.com [127.0.0.1]) by prod-mail-ppoint2.akamai.com (8.16.0.17/8.16.0.17) with SMTP id v67HFrsj015804; Fri, 7 Jul 2017 13:16:58 -0400
Received: from email.msg.corp.akamai.com ([172.27.123.33]) by prod-mail-ppoint2.akamai.com with ESMTP id 2bhm6e3wbu-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Fri, 07 Jul 2017 13:16:58 -0400
Received: from USMA1EX-DAG1MB5.msg.corp.akamai.com (172.27.123.105) by usma1ex-dag3mb6.msg.corp.akamai.com (172.27.123.54) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1263.5; Fri, 7 Jul 2017 10:16:57 -0700
Received: from USMA1EX-DAG1MB1.msg.corp.akamai.com (172.27.123.101) by usma1ex-dag1mb5.msg.corp.akamai.com (172.27.123.105) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1263.5; Fri, 7 Jul 2017 13:16:57 -0400
Received: from USMA1EX-DAG1MB1.msg.corp.akamai.com ([172.27.123.101]) by usma1ex-dag1mb1.msg.corp.akamai.com ([172.27.123.101]) with mapi id 15.00.1263.000; Fri, 7 Jul 2017 13:16:57 -0400
From: "Salz, Rich" <rsalz@akamai.com>
To: Russ Housley <housley@vigilsec.com>, Richard Barnes <rlb@ipv.sx>
CC: IETF TLS <tls@ietf.org>, Matthew Green <matthewdgreen@gmail.com>
Thread-Topic: [TLS] draft-green-tls-static-dh-in-tls13-01
Thread-Index: AQHS9u8P86lPDndxlUiqCEzu895UtqJIl6UAgAA7lAD//8diAA==
Date: Fri, 7 Jul 2017 17:16:56 +0000
Message-ID: <e25f75b11312481ab0441e2d129803f1@usma1ex-dag1mb1.msg.corp.akamai.com>
References: <CAPCANN-xgf3auqy+pFfL6VO5GpEsCCHYkROAwiB1u=8a4yj+Fg@mail.gmail.com> <CAL02cgRJeauV9NQ2OrGK1ocQtg-M2tbWm2+5HUc4-Wc8KC3vxQ@mail.gmail.com> <71E07F32-230F-447C-B85B-9B3B4146D386@vigilsec.com>
In-Reply-To: <71E07F32-230F-447C-B85B-9B3B4146D386@vigilsec.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-ms-exchange-transport-fromentityheader: Hosted
x-originating-ip: [172.19.32.247]
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_e25f75b11312481ab0441e2d129803f1usma1exdag1mb1msgcorpak_"
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=fsecure engine=2.50.10432:, , definitions=2017-07-07_08:, , signatures=0
X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=notspam policy=default score=0 spamscore=0 suspectscore=0 malwarescore=0 phishscore=0 adultscore=0 bulkscore=0 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx scancount=1 engine=8.0.1-1703280000 definitions=main-1707070287
X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=fsecure engine=2.50.10432:, , definitions=2017-07-07_08:, , signatures=0
X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=notspam policy=default score=0 priorityscore=1501 malwarescore=0 suspectscore=0 phishscore=0 bulkscore=0 spamscore=0 clxscore=1011 lowpriorityscore=0 impostorscore=0 adultscore=0 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx scancount=1 engine=8.0.1-1703280000 definitions=main-1707070286
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/tls/EufxOkoC_A9x4v_M3lM-sVOj1nI>
Subject: Re: [TLS] draft-green-tls-static-dh-in-tls13-01
X-BeenThere: tls@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: "This is the mailing list for the Transport Layer Security working group of the IETF." <tls.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/tls>, <mailto:tls-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/tls/>
List-Post: <mailto:tls@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tls-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tls>, <mailto:tls-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 07 Jul 2017 17:17:03 -0000

I think there is little doubt that the draft is technically sound.

The question is, should the IETF “endorse” this by saying it is a product of the TLS working group?  That will certainly send a mixed message to some.  As we heard around around Seoul, not adopting might send a message to some industries that we are not interested in helping to solve their problems.

It is a fraught issue.