IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [TLS] draft-green-tls-static-dh-in-tls13-01

Stephen Farrell <stephen.farrell@cs.tcd.ie> Sun, 16 July 2017 00:39 UTC

Return-Path: <stephen.farrell@cs.tcd.ie>
X-Original-To: tls@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: tls@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D3FFF12F253 for <tls@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 15 Jul 2017 17:39:24 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -4.302
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.302 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=cs.tcd.ie
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id a8TKp5wb4xD7 for <tls@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 15 Jul 2017 17:39:23 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mercury.scss.tcd.ie (mercury.scss.tcd.ie [134.226.56.6]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0A01D13144D for <tls@ietf.org>; Sat, 15 Jul 2017 17:39:22 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mercury.scss.tcd.ie (Postfix) with ESMTP id C5AFCBE50; Sun, 16 Jul 2017 01:39:19 +0100 (IST)
X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at scss.tcd.ie
Received: from mercury.scss.tcd.ie ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (mercury.scss.tcd.ie [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id yY0JtE51gBS0; Sun, 16 Jul 2017 01:39:18 +0100 (IST)
Received: from [10.244.2.100] (95-45-153-252-dynamic.agg2.phb.bdt-fng.eircom.net [95.45.153.252]) by mercury.scss.tcd.ie (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 8F5F6BE38; Sun, 16 Jul 2017 01:39:18 +0100 (IST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cs.tcd.ie; s=mail; t=1500165558; bh=aOrYwF4SunGbdayUFU+wYkXuj7bAVqWnrKnlw3D2n/0=; h=Subject:To:Cc:References:From:Date:In-Reply-To:From; b=eKFpR18X/iW7t2qhc8E1q9Sn1dLa0vM+aibVNp6wc+a9rSaukFOeLiyU9ePNZqFlK o2KGDemXMCoucoc0plppvh+aGskwMMPU6wjVxrfLpccCx6zAShov6UyTNU+hBh8qIT ruLzVEaoqZzU4HjXBjdYU2HTPp7s3+XHnWQXCFAg=
To: Colm MacCárthaigh <colm@allcosts.net>, "Salz, Rich" <rsalz@akamai.com>
Cc: "tls@ietf.org" <tls@ietf.org>, Matthew Green <matthewdgreen@gmail.com>
References: <CAPCANN-xgf3auqy+pFfL6VO5GpEsCCHYkROAwiB1u=8a4yj+Fg@mail.gmail.com> <CAOjisRxxN9QjCqmDpkBOsEhEc7XCpM9Hk9QSSAO65XDPNegy0w@mail.gmail.com> <CABtrr-XbJMYQ+FTQQiSw2gmDVjnpuhgJb3GTWXvLkNewwuJmUg@mail.gmail.com> <8b502340b84f48e99814ae0f16b6b3ef@usma1ex-dag1mb1.msg.corp.akamai.com> <87o9smrzxh.fsf@fifthhorseman.net> <CAAF6GDc7e4k5ze3JpS3oOWeixDnyg8CK30iBCEZj-GWzZFv_zg@mail.gmail.com> <54cdd1077ba3414bbacd6dc1fcad4327@usma1ex-dag1mb1.msg.corp.akamai.com> <CAAF6GDeSv+T1ww5_nr6NPgg9k44j7y04tJWC=KeaJF7Gtt+TVQ@mail.gmail.com>
From: Stephen Farrell <stephen.farrell@cs.tcd.ie>
Openpgp: id=D66EA7906F0B897FB2E97D582F3C8736805F8DA2; url=
Message-ID: <9bd78bb6-1640-68f6-e501-7377dd92172f@cs.tcd.ie>
Date: Sun, 16 Jul 2017 01:39:17 +0100
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/52.2.1
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <CAAF6GDeSv+T1ww5_nr6NPgg9k44j7y04tJWC=KeaJF7Gtt+TVQ@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg="pgp-sha256"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="GdbIrI2kkkhnbLS89IE43oWKD5AldlUtA"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/tls/KzqKBAiOEa78nNMo3-hUWInNnNg>
Subject: Re: [TLS] draft-green-tls-static-dh-in-tls13-01
X-BeenThere: tls@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: "This is the mailing list for the Transport Layer Security working group of the IETF." <tls.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/tls>, <mailto:tls-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/tls/>
List-Post: <mailto:tls@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tls-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tls>, <mailto:tls-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 16 Jul 2017 00:39:25 -0000


On 15/07/17 23:55, Colm MacCárthaigh wrote:
> So far responses on the mailing list have been saying "Don't use
> pcap, instead run proxies".
Sorry, but that is incorrect. Some list participants
have said "we need pcap" and others have said that
"no, we do not need to use packet capture." And others,
myself included, consider that there is dearth of
evidence.

The only reason to point that out is that it's one
amongst a pile of statements from the proponents of
drafgreen, that make assumptions that are pretty
clearly counter-factual.

S.

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email