IETF Logo Mail Archive

[TLS] Re: PQ Cipher Suite I-Ds: adopt or not?

Russ Housley <housley@vigilsec.com> Mon, 16 December 2024 23:13 UTC

Return-Path: <housley@vigilsec.com>
X-Original-To: tls@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: tls@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9A05BC15155C for <tls@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 16 Dec 2024 15:13:49 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.105
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.105 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_BLOCKED=0.001, RCVD_IN_VALIDITY_RPBL_BLOCKED=0.001, RCVD_IN_VALIDITY_SAFE_BLOCKED=0.001, RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01, URIBL_DBL_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, URIBL_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=vigilsec.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id QDhP_vhUILJX for <tls@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 16 Dec 2024 15:13:45 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail3.g24.pair.com (mail3.g24.pair.com [66.39.134.11]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature ECDSA (P-256) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 757D8C15109F for <tls@ietf.org>; Mon, 16 Dec 2024 15:13:45 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail3.g24.pair.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail3.g24.pair.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id CAEA5183B04; Mon, 16 Dec 2024 18:13:44 -0500 (EST)
Received: from smtpclient.apple (unknown [96.241.2.243]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail3.g24.pair.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id B9BAA1837E6; Mon, 16 Dec 2024 18:13:44 -0500 (EST)
Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="Apple-Mail=_3BADEB1D-30BD-4A6B-9AC0-3B88503E4457"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg="pgp-sha256"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 16.0 \(3826.200.121\))
From: Russ Housley <housley@vigilsec.com>
In-Reply-To: <ea32ebd6-e57d-4da6-9250-a3e4d75d11a0@betaapp.fastmail.com>
Date: Mon, 16 Dec 2024 18:13:34 -0500
Message-Id: <29756E90-B336-4C6B-9BE5-491FDA9641E2@vigilsec.com>
References: <10A06A24-8126-47B9-B187-55F4288DBBF2@sn3rd.com> <ea32ebd6-e57d-4da6-9250-a3e4d75d11a0@betaapp.fastmail.com>
To: Sean Turner <sean@sn3rd.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3826.200.121)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=vigilsec.com; h=content-type:mime-version:subject:from:in-reply-to:date:cc:message-id:references:to; s=pair-202402141609; bh=VuXaEFeMhUNWQNakvKw7sE9l5NxRFuaKNTImUR4UGeU=; b=KMp44IpCwJNwqA/kV3pKPm+y8bvmDVSD80bor61T4+iwujxhDEF+20B08pJU4bVNQHZt0TXiOEJHLTh6SuQ/WubaDYFsIpj5er7yiVGrUNqdgNeK7J43Uq+HA5UyXVJkqhhQbvC5IVVcqEHlwszc3GG6ehgseDKK7S3oItRF0HTJ/QyCIivW6H1WbF9QzqcmcscB5eeuveNrAAxxVPRIbLNEVLLsiRV0YPh8VORRCvRrRJ0So/HS7ul4GsX14xGfNAGO01fIbEYj7M71GqX/nQjayYh7DdZGWRUw0POECI8V+gk3mYp5pyhdDuHQqIgTf0q3bq9uGKPP3zRNeVG4Nw==
X-Scanned-By: mailmunge 3.11 on 66.39.134.11
Message-ID-Hash: R6RUWC6EJOIQPFVCMFAXJPPKULT6BNR7
X-Message-ID-Hash: R6RUWC6EJOIQPFVCMFAXJPPKULT6BNR7
X-MailFrom: housley@vigilsec.com
X-Mailman-Rule-Misses: dmarc-mitigation; no-senders; approved; emergency; loop; banned-address; member-moderation; header-match-tls.ietf.org-0; nonmember-moderation; administrivia; implicit-dest; max-recipients; max-size; news-moderation; no-subject; digests; suspicious-header
CC: IETF TLS <tls@ietf.org>
X-Mailman-Version: 3.3.9rc6
Precedence: list
Subject: [TLS] Re: PQ Cipher Suite I-Ds: adopt or not?
List-Id: "This is the mailing list for the Transport Layer Security working group of the IETF." <tls.ietf.org>
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/tls/FmrJS9b4UbBc_HnvimfpnEqPQ0M>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/tls>
List-Help: <mailto:tls-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Owner: <mailto:tls-owner@ietf.org>
List-Post: <mailto:tls@ietf.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:tls-join@ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:tls-leave@ietf.org>

+1.  There are people that want to implement both hybrid and pure key exchange.  This action would allow a path to RECOMMENDED = Y for both in the future.

Russ


> On Dec 16, 2024, at 5:21 PM, Martin Thomson <mt@lowentropy.net> wrote:
> 
> On Tue, Dec 17, 2024, at 08:59, Sean Turner wrote:
>> Is the WG consensus to run four separate adoption calls for the 
>> individual I-Ds in question?
> 
> I would like to see adoption calls for the key exchange modes and not the signature modes.  The key exchange documents are both more ready and more urgent.
> 
> The question of whether to set Recommended = Y for any particular choice is separable and can wait.  Keep things as Recommended = N for now.

v2.46.0 | Report a Bug | By Email | System Status