[TLS] Weekly github digest (TLS Working Group Drafts)

Repository Activity Summary Bot <do_not_reply@mnot.net> Sun, 20 September 2020 07:32 UTC

Return-Path: <do_not_reply@mnot.net>
X-Original-To: tls@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: tls@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6F8503A112D for <tls@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 20 Sep 2020 00:32:45 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.119
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.119 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=mnot.net header.b=TrLLyBo5; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=messagingengine.com header.b=WDJz4LAR
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 9xSmeFv31D1Z for <tls@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 20 Sep 2020 00:32:42 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from out1-smtp.messagingengine.com (out1-smtp.messagingengine.com [66.111.4.25]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B33BF3A0B0E for <tls@ietf.org>; Sun, 20 Sep 2020 00:32:42 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from compute1.internal (compute1.nyi.internal [10.202.2.41]) by mailout.nyi.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id CA0BD5C00B2 for <tls@ietf.org>; Sun, 20 Sep 2020 03:32:41 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from mailfrontend1 ([10.202.2.162]) by compute1.internal (MEProxy); Sun, 20 Sep 2020 03:32:41 -0400
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=mnot.net; h= content-type:mime-version:from:to:subject:message-id:date; s= fm3; bh=5Kepp9JCibeBZgyxr2VZXp+Tww9lT9oPm/uFfjpsJK4=; b=TrLLyBo5 if2hkkUhuSD1Bzqo4kMRXHSocus9Arfq1Od1im2HlFZBK67JVrBaUTsf9D0LDlxo PbpnNBz9ewCDOw2D3I0sozvg7jsaVoCiBHAJ8n6uaewak60YqEPGidJOSn5QwRZm FSIPGDV7tffYLoWkqv95kiKtSqMi7kmPoEjWtNLB45PRe3M8czCGmQGcC1f4V64M VjybFg0UG35znBv5RAHwaGF5ghS+ldT5LqRbb17L1pwLxrsZdNTeiEwKttNdcQ6u rbQMU4PG1bdyjqYZ5e8kbdMe5jQHD7Nj/ojtKHAh9XV4Otq98l7153W1anlVOMsC IgCp/kzasP0lMA==
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=content-type:date:from:message-id :mime-version:subject:to:x-me-proxy:x-me-proxy:x-me-sender :x-me-sender:x-sasl-enc; s=fm3; bh=5Kepp9JCibeBZgyxr2VZXp+Tww9lT 9oPm/uFfjpsJK4=; b=WDJz4LARdD/qzYLUczI2qcUwipxjyKnyUltO3yzCWM8VI bdCd5ivHUAnn20c0W/5VTnsXrWR3Ohmq635fviqDGeYevqMEqvq9kwlzE4RnrNsR CAqm5xz0J54WJV3R53d/oA+s9lRIF90dF9KkSdIXIm7aqiET7W7VSvbvj9xddREC 7/br4T44nH/+M+lSg7csqD0xCTZLHqOQp/1NxlRBRLVa1F9xAepk6EfPq7T1A55t 83/25siR0bs1o8F4KlEdRNdhw8Bc5jWKHGt7rDk5KQlSxcW8lnMic6WIWBZAlc7b XrOkoJYsZB9i93WX9I2xIBAONFJlCN3WRgzeYbStw==
X-ME-Sender: <xms:mQVnX_HHFT4Huc_Nv-ysLhc5iIzi04ZEFs28Il1v2g0Gb7WRg6Qv2w> <xme:mQVnX8XDCpkXekdY1TnLkZugjCCHy4XvreH-THwhqbVYQogQj5-kOORrF_Pzmpfje Fh_IBAxsbbdwMkmag>
X-ME-Proxy-Cause: gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrgedujedrtdelgdduudeiucetufdoteggodetrfdotf fvucfrrhhofhhilhgvmecuhfgrshhtofgrihhlpdfqfgfvpdfurfetoffkrfgpnffqhgen uceurghilhhouhhtmecufedttdenucenucfjughrpegtggfhvffusegrtddtredttdejne cuhfhrohhmpeftvghpohhsihhtohhrhicutegtthhivhhithihucfuuhhmmhgrrhihuceu ohhtuceoughopghnohhtpghrvghplhihsehmnhhothdrnhgvtheqnecuggftrfgrthhtvg hrnhepkeefvdduteejvdefkeehieevuefgfefhteetveegffekffefteffvdelheduieet necuffhomhgrihhnpehgihhthhhusgdrtghomhenucfkphephedvrddujeelrdduieefrd ejieenucevlhhushhtvghrufhiiigvpedvnecurfgrrhgrmhepmhgrihhlfhhrohhmpegu ohgpnhhothgprhgvphhlhiesmhhnohhtrdhnvght
X-ME-Proxy: <xmx:mQVnXxKxdBxAtPuLiuFC52t_NJBhKuVln2u8d2NLSVy81oe6PcIy5w> <xmx:mQVnX9H8QBJstQAoKcAKaNgvY0vrqyL3PqNC55fHTn9vkuq-baTngg> <xmx:mQVnX1Uvv7NZksCAKI7N9d7RjK272z1bhdIyDhxJl105oPL4L6pN9A> <xmx:mQVnX0dx8iur6wW8N2SHA-a0f5imh_VBtpnBivMLfpyOsL8sE1F3Ug>
Received: from fv-az60.internal.cloudapp.net (unknown [52.179.163.76]) by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA id 899AE3280059 for <tls@ietf.org>; Sun, 20 Sep 2020 03:32:41 -0400 (EDT)
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="===============1949011105432763298=="
MIME-Version: 1.0
From: Repository Activity Summary Bot <do_not_reply@mnot.net>
To: tls@ietf.org
Message-Id: <20200920073241.899AE3280059@mailuser.nyi.internal>
Date: Sun, 20 Sep 2020 03:32:41 -0400 (EDT)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/tls/G1vXqYJsOERUFpcdAkQiA7662Ew>
Subject: [TLS] Weekly github digest (TLS Working Group Drafts)
X-BeenThere: tls@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "This is the mailing list for the Transport Layer Security working group of the IETF." <tls.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/tls>, <mailto:tls-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/tls/>
List-Post: <mailto:tls@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tls-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tls>, <mailto:tls-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 20 Sep 2020 07:32:50 -0000



Issues
------
* tlswg/draft-ietf-tls-esni (+0/-5/💬7)
  4 issues received 7 new comments:
  - #297 Proposal: Add version indication to ClientEncryptedCH (2 by cjpatton)
    https://github.com/tlswg/draft-ietf-tls-esni/issues/297 
  - #290 What to do on ECH decryption failure? (1 by chris-wood)
    https://github.com/tlswg/draft-ietf-tls-esni/issues/290 
  - #289 Rejecting ECH for unrecognized backend servers (2 by chris-wood, cjpatton)
    https://github.com/tlswg/draft-ietf-tls-esni/issues/289 
  - #264 Handshake-level vs record-level padding (2 by davidben, kaduk)
    https://github.com/tlswg/draft-ietf-tls-esni/issues/264 [needs WG discussion] 

  5 issues closed:
  - Rejecting ECH for unrecognized backend servers https://github.com/tlswg/draft-ietf-tls-esni/issues/289 
  - Proposal: Add version indication to ClientEncryptedCH https://github.com/tlswg/draft-ietf-tls-esni/issues/297 
  - "ech_accept" response type undefined https://github.com/tlswg/draft-ietf-tls-esni/issues/267 
  - What to do on ECH decryption failure? https://github.com/tlswg/draft-ietf-tls-esni/issues/290 
  - Question about encrypted_ch and encrypted_ch_inner https://github.com/tlswg/draft-ietf-tls-esni/issues/301 



Pull requests
-------------
* tlswg/draft-ietf-tls-esni (+3/-5/💬0)
  3 pull requests submitted:
  - Remove reference to "'ech_accept' response type" (by cjpatton)
    https://github.com/tlswg/draft-ietf-tls-esni/pull/304 
  - Lock ECHConfig.version to the codepoint and advance to 0xff08. (by cjpatton)
    https://github.com/tlswg/draft-ietf-tls-esni/pull/303 
  - Fix a misrepresentation of "encrypted_ch" (by cjpatton)
    https://github.com/tlswg/draft-ietf-tls-esni/pull/302 

  5 pull requests merged:
  - Remove reference to "'ech_accept' response type"
    https://github.com/tlswg/draft-ietf-tls-esni/pull/304 
  - Lock ECHConfig.version to the codepoint and advance to 0xff08.
    https://github.com/tlswg/draft-ietf-tls-esni/pull/303 
  - Clarify distinction between rejection and decryption failure
    https://github.com/tlswg/draft-ietf-tls-esni/pull/291 
  - Fix the alerts reference.
    https://github.com/tlswg/draft-ietf-tls-esni/pull/299 
  - Fix a misrepresentation of "encrypted_ch"
    https://github.com/tlswg/draft-ietf-tls-esni/pull/302 


Repositories tracked by this digest:
-----------------------------------
* https://github.com/tlswg/draft-ietf-tls-semistatic-dh
* https://github.com/tlswg/draft-ietf-tls-md5-sha1-deprecate
* https://github.com/tlswg/draft-ietf-tls-esni
* https://github.com/tlswg/certificate-compression
* https://github.com/tlswg/draft-ietf-tls-external-psk-importer
* https://github.com/tlswg/draft-ietf-tls-ticketrequest
* https://github.com/tlswg/tls-flags
* https://github.com/tlswg/dtls13-spec
* https://github.com/tlswg/dtls-conn-id
* https://github.com/tlswg/tls-subcerts
* https://github.com/tlswg/oldversions-deprecate
* https://github.com/tlswg/sniencryption
* https://github.com/tlswg/tls-exported-authenticator
* https://github.com/tlswg/draft-ietf-tls-grease