[TLS] draft-farrell-tls-pemesni-02 status
Joseph Salowey <jsalowey@gmail.com> Thu, 17 March 2022 20:57 UTC
Return-Path: <jsalowey@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: tls@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: tls@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id DBE273A15B1 for <tls@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 17 Mar 2022 13:57:35 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -7.108
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-7.108 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id kNQIdWEDFOS8 for <tls@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 17 Mar 2022 13:57:34 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-lj1-x22e.google.com (mail-lj1-x22e.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::22e]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7C47E3A15B0 for <tls@ietf.org>; Thu, 17 Mar 2022 13:57:34 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-lj1-x22e.google.com with SMTP id o6so8886616ljp.3 for <tls@ietf.org>; Thu, 17 Mar 2022 13:57:34 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20210112; h=mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=e38JBQF6ajVkcTnc9ao2Th4GiQIzRiH4AV5bDK+JdQE=; b=fp7igJGkehj6L3X3qlTAJwwByFgzkAmubbmTWn9RinM8hnkXf45PG2yK+U6M0522DU inayD7WNngpXexgiD4AoLZi0mUEdPL437sNw/vCup1QRJGMv1KufLJB2SDaHz8Z511iO xl8281Rg8SqS/WS5TTPn7jPfV1/Ppy1tYzsedkfHpSWThUE+GhNNHd/9OeNtP+Grd+Lh zt8xol/h1U0xytvQYIlHhw81neLqqPG7u4MClAi82lFk40KS6KMIyn/3D6zcgknwczL+ ki3MwtWZm6A1cKDSvyKWxl4f0SvulrOw2G6MoZN2yXl80w7W1CptR1ZKBf9HojpQvwMJ U0rw==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=e38JBQF6ajVkcTnc9ao2Th4GiQIzRiH4AV5bDK+JdQE=; b=sluPkoTeMP6ZiV+qgrCx9jRmGtMGUEmsjEYQc8OIL+BnzRUlxygdXiyeX3Hz1lqX07 ZT2ulbqsotuGPlO7+DlNo0oknMv0OdAfEw/Uxhe/o2u0furHwuXXxM89UGd/GiqcUDbO QkoXMhdCvAsWWl47zxv+LpC3XPq1RhZTPXJxjgLpTTRF3NTF4522qsC5vYdfQ7RFtxCh lEakXUwFKszD6y1NBm5PnFw1ibSVXL37/uVavlj1P57ir+YeoffAkIqYGcLpRaQnUxJ5 8Aar/rciKvr+PM+3sj60sHftR+fP3Vmcp3Bjj/2TCSz68+ZttNOYN29NGYvkj8ZKdRam hXJA==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM533uarPPJK36FdukY7+ppgUbn0p3PJBpIQk0qirBhtaNtDurZoMc Md1kyK0FAbcAfz38m8nMDBARocuqrLD3jwv0q3oSuK2L
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJyALIv7c4RQm+HHkWc7E0NRyzLlHd4K6ANSFdIZepsDBbJPgKwC7RduM68bwjgtu2mSwQDx/GkV8sX+Fsph+eE=
X-Received: by 2002:a2e:161e:0:b0:249:227f:626f with SMTP id w30-20020a2e161e000000b00249227f626fmr4399055ljd.130.1647550652055; Thu, 17 Mar 2022 13:57:32 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
From: Joseph Salowey <jsalowey@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 17 Mar 2022 13:57:21 -0700
Message-ID: <CAD7+=RCtQT=kON+JjhbJEt6ZqF7_RwQSE4eeh_iLU54m-cdxug@mail.gmail.com>
To: tls@ietf.org
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="0000000000005d85aa05da7047aa"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/tls/Iv8_x1zZDyMhc7H6yAacv213ogk>
Subject: [TLS] draft-farrell-tls-pemesni-02 status
X-BeenThere: tls@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "This is the mailing list for the Transport Layer Security working group of the IETF." <tls.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/tls>, <mailto:tls-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/tls/>
List-Post: <mailto:tls@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tls-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tls>, <mailto:tls-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 17 Mar 2022 20:57:36 -0000
While we are all supportive of ECH, we are not sure that the PEM file format for ECH I-D (draft-farrell-tls-pemesni-02) is within scope of the TLS WG. The WG has not always but mostly recently stuck to adopting I-Ds that relate to the TLS wire format. SECDISPATCH or UTA or even DNSOP might be a better place for this work. Joe and Sean
- [TLS] draft-farrell-tls-pemesni-02 status Joseph Salowey
- Re: [TLS] draft-farrell-tls-pemesni-02 status Stephen Farrell
- Re: [TLS] draft-farrell-tls-pemesni-02 status Salz, Rich