[TLS] Weekly github digest (TLS Working Group Drafts)
Repository Activity Summary Bot <do_not_reply@mnot.net> Sun, 13 March 2022 07:39 UTC
Return-Path: <do_not_reply@mnot.net>
X-Original-To: tls@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: tls@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0B6903A0D61 for <tls@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 12 Mar 2022 23:39:00 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.708
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.708 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_INVALID=0.1, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_BLOCKED=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=fail (2048-bit key) reason="fail (message has been altered)" header.d=mnot.net header.b=Ccf9HLkq; dkim=fail (2048-bit key) reason="fail (message has been altered)" header.d=messagingengine.com header.b=E/jk4DIl
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id AXuftOGiIb_H for <tls@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 12 Mar 2022 23:38:55 -0800 (PST)
Received: from wout3-smtp.messagingengine.com (wout3-smtp.messagingengine.com [64.147.123.19]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ADH-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id F0A413A0D40 for <tls@ietf.org>; Sat, 12 Mar 2022 23:38:54 -0800 (PST)
Received: from compute2.internal (compute2.nyi.internal [10.202.2.46]) by mailout.west.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id 592703200754 for <tls@ietf.org>; Sun, 13 Mar 2022 03:38:53 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from mailfrontend2 ([10.202.2.163]) by compute2.internal (MEProxy); Sun, 13 Mar 2022 03:38:53 -0400
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=mnot.net; h=cc :content-type:date:from:from:in-reply-to:mime-version:reply-to :sender:subject:subject:to:to; s=fm2; bh=Q9Ndcpzm7qsoqM4v9nBJpwb ewsDKWh1z+Nmo2fUhsh8=; b=Ccf9HLkqyN7wM4qOcc/VWrM6AoknrkwMdfoVQ+P ON5sfqYCWKLOgY9sGkTXNUwEMLIfVZcX/Tw3vYigZuBYNWcAPFOspUjoRT2DEp+z Kst5B14MD9o0+iEeJNIKRCjs8iAMpVmQivk6bW9BZTDQxPb+XfOdtipVld87jFN6 5HAUfzuLyM9MPIOb1+Y/gMGz3jTFuv1sQA+sReojf70bn3jYDLPxij+aqb+lKhsL fpflbTIlt5IdtGIXgq+sogpw246C2kEvpVof49HwdvDeG1RxoEBialj91qKsb/Zd xdipUZDQbwzmyM1Dq5pK+D0WHxIcK0Ji391fb6e3f31v/rw==
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=cc:content-type:date:from:from :in-reply-to:mime-version:reply-to:sender:subject:subject:to:to :x-me-proxy:x-me-proxy:x-me-sender:x-me-sender:x-sasl-enc; s= fm2; bh=Q9Ndcpzm7qsoqM4v9nBJpwbewsDKWh1z+Nmo2fUhsh8=; b=E/jk4DIl +93BoeXcjsR9zqY6CiEHOrtX5OIj/AGiFM1IDSBPz2zQzKPNNktJe9RjKrKzBhlu DCG0t8ImEMsr/KhF+2eF26hquOp7mGmhJOMIgahPlGYvzPkIeBVdslFMr5D+kAzT 9ckyvZWEpSFk1Vxv5NBmUdyDM6zLDZaKDKJP0PElfsNioLDxDZC41bss1KpNr8FU KLfWN97fHuoTaY2yNBtQaT7Ou2icZ5wmznIDK3yngCziing59l0iRVopuyXQM8g1 cYxOeb4c6QsY3AFi2rkQcxCYQ7CokFG2E6uVpFBCpXU4GrivkbHM4HQlEPTSVTKg 1YXxKLQL8eWuRA==
X-ME-Sender: <xms:jJ8tYvY3Ws6t9bTFEo9nyi9JxganBttniX6w-2dSTuA3SR1vW4-JdA> <xme:jJ8tYubzbh3KSmVDeX08S5y4-kqODYgoNtqwwFKY2RwutKEKaVUqz4Vcdm4HTlwdK T3NqJ-cihpva4_0lw>
X-ME-Received: <xmr:jJ8tYh_Vxnqpyx25JoKXSK2K4DNmbgmqvES6YQjdpqcuA6c1sMllVkAA-VHGMb7ds6t5HppmWMUkQm1_CyzqQU8rXUTFPwK2kVRH3hbi0TvmxeK1YdK91lQgWq8OFJn7HVM>
X-ME-Proxy-Cause: gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrgedvvddruddvhedguddtlecutefuodetggdotefrod ftvfcurfhrohhfihhlvgemucfhrghsthforghilhdpqfgfvfdpuffrtefokffrpgfnqfgh necuuegrihhlohhuthemuceftddtnecupfhoucgurghtvgcufhhivghlugculdegledmne cujfgurheptggghffvufesrgdttdertddtjeenucfhrhhomheptfgvphhoshhithhorhih ucettghtihhvihhthicuufhumhhmrghrhicuuehothcuoeguohgpnhhothgprhgvphhlhi esmhhnohhtrdhnvghtqeenucggtffrrghtthgvrhhnpeekfedvudetjedvfeekheeiveeu gfefhfetteevgeffkefffeetffdvleehudeiteenucffohhmrghinhepghhithhhuhgsrd gtohhmnecuvehluhhsthgvrhfuihiivgeptdenucfrrghrrghmpehmrghilhhfrhhomhep ughopghnohhtpghrvghplhihsehmnhhothdrnhgvth
X-ME-Proxy: <xmx:jJ8tYloEmonVZTlPxfymCiizpA5zUejlAY6PNWBB9BLP52C3JXqWxw> <xmx:jJ8tYqp6uEFUAVOPaz7qXTuJ0lniJqnI7toeTudWBS5DG2SZeeD7tQ> <xmx:jJ8tYrSSX7tOVzal9HFB2donBufoUnxMaLUj5A5meU_DGBUl3OcinA> <xmx:jJ8tYh1zVBqRK1Ke19ErrmZY0JKM6RsqG9zqgCxgdhBI2_5hj0rIJA>
Received: by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA for <tls@ietf.org>; Sun, 13 Mar 2022 03:38:52 -0400 (EDT)
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="===============4318472159294556964=="
MIME-Version: 1.0
From: Repository Activity Summary Bot <do_not_reply@mnot.net>
To: tls@ietf.org
Message-Id: <20220313073854.F0A413A0D40@ietfa.amsl.com>
Date: Sat, 12 Mar 2022 23:38:54 -0800
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/tls/xELqbF5n9jgEZ5LA_oHAcxygs7U>
Subject: [TLS] Weekly github digest (TLS Working Group Drafts)
X-BeenThere: tls@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "This is the mailing list for the Transport Layer Security working group of the IETF." <tls.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/tls>, <mailto:tls-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/tls/>
List-Post: <mailto:tls@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tls-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tls>, <mailto:tls-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 13 Mar 2022 07:39:09 -0000
Issues ------ * tlswg/draft-ietf-tls-external-psk-importer (+0/-1/π¬0) 1 issues closed: - Address Ben's review https://github.com/tlswg/draft-ietf-tls-external-psk-importer/issues/42 * tlswg/tls13-spec (+2/-3/π¬5) 2 issues created: - AEAD limits for early data (by martinthomson) https://github.com/tlswg/tls13-spec/issues/1256 - Should we recommend rekey with ECHDE after a certain amount (by ekr) https://github.com/tlswg/tls13-spec/issues/1253 5 issues received 5 new comments: - #1253 Should we recommend rekey with ECHDE after a certain amount (1 by martinthomson) https://github.com/tlswg/tls13-spec/issues/1253 [discuss-vienna] - #1250 Multiple post-handshake authentications, identities, and tickets. (1 by ekr) https://github.com/tlswg/tls13-spec/issues/1250 [propose-close] - #1249 AEAD integrity limits for 0-RTT data (1 by ekr) https://github.com/tlswg/tls13-spec/issues/1249 - #1214 Implication of Recommended/Not Recommended (1 by ekr) https://github.com/tlswg/tls13-spec/issues/1214 - #1206 More clarity on what should be in the cookies. (1 by ekr) https://github.com/tlswg/tls13-spec/issues/1206 [propose-close] 3 issues closed: - Clarifications on traffic key use https://github.com/tlswg/tls13-spec/issues/1248 [PR Pending] - AEAD integrity limits for 0-RTT data https://github.com/tlswg/tls13-spec/issues/1249 [PR Pending] - Forward secrecy, long connections, and key exfiltration https://github.com/tlswg/tls13-spec/issues/1245 * tlswg/dtls13-spec (+0/-0/π¬1) 1 issues received 1 new comments: - #260 AEAD integrity limits for 0-RTT data (1 by martinthomson) https://github.com/tlswg/dtls13-spec/issues/260 [propose-close] * tlswg/tls-subcerts (+1/-2/π¬1) 1 issues created: - Expiry behavior ambiguity (by jsalowey) https://github.com/tlswg/tls-subcerts/issues/96 1 issues received 1 new comments: - #96 Expiry behavior ambiguity (1 by jsalowey) https://github.com/tlswg/tls-subcerts/issues/96 2 issues closed: - Expiry behavior ambiguity https://github.com/tlswg/tls-subcerts/issues/96 - Add DTLS https://github.com/tlswg/tls-subcerts/issues/94 * tlswg/draft-ietf-tls-ctls (+1/-3/π¬5) 1 issues created: - What is `profile_id`? (by bemasc) https://github.com/tlswg/draft-ietf-tls-ctls/issues/54 2 issues received 5 new comments: - #42 Request: Make fragmented handshake messages self-delimiting in cTLS/TCP (2 by bemasc, ekr) https://github.com/tlswg/draft-ietf-tls-ctls/issues/42 - #40 Request: Discuss encoding of Alerts (3 by bemasc, ekr) https://github.com/tlswg/draft-ietf-tls-ctls/issues/40 3 issues closed: - Request: Discuss encoding of Alerts https://github.com/tlswg/draft-ietf-tls-ctls/issues/40 - suppressSequenceNumber is not defined https://github.com/tlswg/draft-ietf-tls-ctls/issues/38 - Request: Clarify extensibility rules https://github.com/tlswg/draft-ietf-tls-ctls/issues/39 Pull requests ------------- * tlswg/draft-ietf-tls-external-psk-importer (+0/-1/π¬0) 1 pull requests merged: - Address Ben's IESG feedback. https://github.com/tlswg/draft-ietf-tls-external-psk-importer/pull/43 * tlswg/tls13-spec (+3/-4/π¬4) 3 pull requests submitted: - Issue1248 traffic key use (by ekr) https://github.com/tlswg/tls13-spec/pull/1255 - No rekey in early data. Fixes #1249 (by ekr) https://github.com/tlswg/tls13-spec/pull/1254 - This attempts to split the difference on the 1.1 and 1.0 deprecation. (by ekr) https://github.com/tlswg/tls13-spec/pull/1252 4 pull requests received 4 new comments: - #1254 No rekey in early data. Fixes #1249 (1 by ekr) https://github.com/tlswg/tls13-spec/pull/1254 - #1252 This attempts to split the difference on the 1.1 and 1.0 deprecation. (1 by ekr) https://github.com/tlswg/tls13-spec/pull/1252 - #1251 Expand the duty of the certificate alerts to PSKs (external and resumβ¦ (1 by ekr) https://github.com/tlswg/tls13-spec/pull/1251 - #1230 RFC 8996 "Deprecating TLS 1.0 and TLS 1.1" (1 by ekr) https://github.com/tlswg/tls13-spec/pull/1230 4 pull requests merged: - Issue1248 traffic key use https://github.com/tlswg/tls13-spec/pull/1255 - No rekey in early data. Fixes #1249 https://github.com/tlswg/tls13-spec/pull/1254 - This attempts to split the difference on the 1.1 and 1.0 deprecation. https://github.com/tlswg/tls13-spec/pull/1252 - Updates and obsolete in abstract https://github.com/tlswg/tls13-spec/pull/1229 * tlswg/dtls13-spec (+0/-0/π¬1) 1 pull requests received 1 new comments: - #269 Clarify closure alert (1 by hannestschofenig) https://github.com/tlswg/dtls13-spec/pull/269 * tlswg/tls-subcerts (+2/-4/π¬1) 2 pull requests submitted: - Nick/ad review (by grittygrease) https://github.com/tlswg/tls-subcerts/pull/98 - Text to address ambiguity in cert expiry (Issue 96) (by jsalowey) https://github.com/tlswg/tls-subcerts/pull/97 1 pull requests received 1 new comments: - #93 Editorial suggestions from AD review (1 by grittygrease) https://github.com/tlswg/tls-subcerts/pull/93 4 pull requests merged: - Nick/ad review https://github.com/tlswg/tls-subcerts/pull/98 - Editorial suggestions from AD review https://github.com/tlswg/tls-subcerts/pull/93 - add DTLS https://github.com/tlswg/tls-subcerts/pull/95 - Text to address ambiguity in cert expiry (Issue 96) https://github.com/tlswg/tls-subcerts/pull/97 * tlswg/draft-ietf-tls-ctls (+4/-6/π¬16) 4 pull requests submitted: - IANA considerations (by ekr) https://github.com/tlswg/draft-ietf-tls-ctls/pull/53 - Clarify DTLS encryption (by ekr) https://github.com/tlswg/draft-ietf-tls-ctls/pull/52 - Replace suppressSequenceNumber with transport-specific behavior (by ekr) https://github.com/tlswg/draft-ietf-tls-ctls/pull/51 - Clarify alerts. Fixes issue #40 (by ekr) https://github.com/tlswg/draft-ietf-tls-ctls/pull/50 3 pull requests received 16 new comments: - #51 Replace suppressSequenceNumber with transport-specific behavior (4 by ekr, hannestschofenig) https://github.com/tlswg/draft-ietf-tls-ctls/pull/51 - #50 Clarify alerts. Fixes issue #40 (11 by bemasc, ekr, hannestschofenig) https://github.com/tlswg/draft-ietf-tls-ctls/pull/50 - #49 suppressSequenceNumber (1 by ekr) https://github.com/tlswg/draft-ietf-tls-ctls/pull/49 6 pull requests merged: - IANA considerations https://github.com/tlswg/draft-ietf-tls-ctls/pull/53 - Make cTLS extensible https://github.com/tlswg/draft-ietf-tls-ctls/pull/45 - Clarify alerts. Fixes issue #40 https://github.com/tlswg/draft-ietf-tls-ctls/pull/50 - Replace suppressSequenceNumber with transport-specific behavior https://github.com/tlswg/draft-ietf-tls-ctls/pull/51 - Clarify DTLS encryption https://github.com/tlswg/draft-ietf-tls-ctls/pull/52 - Benjamin Schwartz added to the acknowledgment section https://github.com/tlswg/draft-ietf-tls-ctls/pull/46 Repositories tracked by this digest: ----------------------------------- * https://github.com/tlswg/draft-ietf-tls-semistatic-dh * https://github.com/tlswg/draft-ietf-tls-md5-sha1-deprecate * https://github.com/tlswg/draft-ietf-tls-esni * https://github.com/tlswg/certificate-compression * https://github.com/tlswg/draft-ietf-tls-external-psk-importer * https://github.com/tlswg/draft-ietf-tls-ticketrequest * https://github.com/tlswg/tls13-spec * https://github.com/tlswg/tls-flags * https://github.com/tlswg/dtls13-spec * https://github.com/tlswg/dtls-conn-id * https://github.com/tlswg/tls-subcerts * https://github.com/tlswg/oldversions-deprecate * https://github.com/tlswg/sniencryption * https://github.com/tlswg/tls-exported-authenticator * https://github.com/tlswg/draft-ietf-tls-ctls * https://github.com/tlswg/external-psk-design-team
- [TLS] Weekly github digest (TLS Working Group Dra⦠Repository Activity Summary Bot