Re: [TLS] IANA considerations I-D Action:draft-ietf-tls-dtls-heartbeat-01.txt

["t.petch" <[e-mail]>]

----- Original Message -----
From: "Michael Tüxen" <[e-mail]>
To: "t.petch" <[e-mail]>
Cc: <[e-mail]>
Sent: Tuesday, February 01, 2011 2:37 PM
> On Feb 1, 2011, at 10:28 AM, t.petch wrote:
>
> > Michael
> >
> > I think that the IANA considerations could do with more work.
> >
> > Dropping 'Heartbeat Modes' and 'Heartbeat Message Types'
> > into the IANA website could cause them to be lost for ever.  If they are
> > specific  to (D)TLS, then I would want to see that in the title, or else
> > have them subordinate to something that does.
>
> We can name them "DTLS and TLS Heartbeat Modes" and
> "DTLS and TLS Heartbeat Message Types" or "(D)TLS Heartbeat Modes"
> and "(D)TLS Heartbeat Message Types", whatever you prefer. Any opinion?

I would go for just TLS Heartbeat Modes, and TLS Heartbeat Message Types.

DTLS is a delta to TLS and there is a statement that everything is expected to
carry across unless otherwise stated, so for me, TLS implies DTLS.

Tom Petch

> >
> > Second, while I like starting with values with one, you leave zero
> > open for the next person to use!  I would suggest reserving
> > zero and 255 in both registries.
> Good idea. Well do that in the next ref.
>
> Best regards
> Michael
> >
> > Tom Petch
>