Re: [TLS] Metadiscussion on changes in draft-ietf-tls-renegotiation

Bob Braden <braden@ISI.EDU> Wed, 27 January 2010 17:52 UTC

Return-Path: <braden@ISI.EDU>
X-Original-To: tls@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: tls@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 23D763A6828; Wed, 27 Jan 2010 09:52:21 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id rkcF+RGX6c1i; Wed, 27 Jan 2010 09:52:20 -0800 (PST)
Received: from boreas.isi.edu (boreas.isi.edu [128.9.160.161]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7200A3A6767; Wed, 27 Jan 2010 09:52:20 -0800 (PST)
Received: from [127.0.0.1] (rtb.isi.edu [128.9.168.81]) by boreas.isi.edu (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id o0RHp9OM016702; Wed, 27 Jan 2010 09:51:10 -0800 (PST)
Message-ID: <4B607D16.70104@isi.edu>
Date: Wed, 27 Jan 2010 09:51:18 -0800
From: Bob Braden <braden@ISI.EDU>
User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.23 (Windows/20090812)
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: mrex@sap.com
References: <201001262043.o0QKh7fX005524@fs4113.wdf.sap.corp>
In-Reply-To: <201001262043.o0QKh7fX005524@fs4113.wdf.sap.corp>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-ISI-4-43-8-MailScanner: Found to be clean
X-MailScanner-From: braden@isi.edu
X-Mailman-Approved-At: Wed, 27 Jan 2010 10:10:09 -0800
Cc: ietf@ietf.org, Paul Hoffman <paul.hoffman@vpnc.org>, tls@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [TLS] Metadiscussion on changes in draft-ietf-tls-renegotiation
X-BeenThere: tls@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: "This is the mailing list for the Transport Layer Security working group of the IETF." <tls.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tls>, <mailto:tls-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/tls>
List-Post: <mailto:tls@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tls-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tls>, <mailto:tls-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 27 Jan 2010 17:52:21 -0000

Martin Rex wrote:

> what do you want to say with this?
> That implementors should ignore at least half of the MUSTs and SHOULDs
> in IETF documents, because they don't make any sense, create unnecessary
> interop problems or are otherwise harmful -- and should not be in the
> document in the first place?

All in all, that pretty much sums up the current (and long standing) 
situation, IMHO.

Bob Braden