[TLS] Metadiscussion on changes in draft-ietf-tls-renegotiation

Paul Hoffman <paul.hoffman@vpnc.org> Tue, 26 January 2010 18:26 UTC

Return-Path: <paul.hoffman@vpnc.org>
X-Original-To: tls@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: tls@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost []) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 81B753A697A; Tue, 26 Jan 2010 10:26:33 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -6.038
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.038 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.008, BAYES_00=-2.599, HELO_MISMATCH_COM=0.553, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com []) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id ZmIHt61ENwF6; Tue, 26 Jan 2010 10:26:32 -0800 (PST)
Received: from balder-227.proper.com (Balder-227.Proper.COM []) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 940753A6861; Tue, 26 Jan 2010 10:26:32 -0800 (PST)
Received: from [] (75-101-30-90.dsl.dynamic.sonic.net []) (authenticated bits=0) by balder-227.proper.com (8.14.2/8.14.2) with ESMTP id o0QIFWfB092015 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Tue, 26 Jan 2010 11:15:33 -0700 (MST) (envelope-from paul.hoffman@vpnc.org)
Mime-Version: 1.0
Message-Id: <p06240803c784e0bdf7f7@[]>
In-Reply-To: <201001261757.o0QHvOXd024945@fs4113.wdf.sap.corp>
References: <201001261757.o0QHvOXd024945@fs4113.wdf.sap.corp>
Date: Tue, 26 Jan 2010 10:15:11 -0800
To: mrex@sap.com, tls@ietf.org
From: Paul Hoffman <paul.hoffman@vpnc.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Cc: ietf@ietf.org
Subject: [TLS] Metadiscussion on changes in draft-ietf-tls-renegotiation
X-BeenThere: tls@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: "This is the mailing list for the Transport Layer Security working group of the IETF." <tls.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tls>, <mailto:tls-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/tls>
List-Post: <mailto:tls@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tls-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tls>, <mailto:tls-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 26 Jan 2010 18:26:33 -0000

At 6:57 PM +0100 1/26/10, Martin Rex wrote:
>The two MUST NOTs that popped up in -03 are in violation of rfc2119 section 6!

...as are about half of all MUSTs and SHOULDs in modern IETF standards.

>Did anyone of you review the new sections in the -03 draft?


>I do not think that rushing the document out of the door as-is
>would be a good idea.  This would set new lows for the level
>of IETF Proposed Standard.

This indicates that you need to read more standards-track RFCs, then.

--Paul Hoffman, Director
--VPN Consortium