Re: [TLS] whither draft-agl-tls-nextprotoneg? EncryptedExtensions? (was: Update on Origin-Bound Certificates: Now called "Channel ID")
Adam Langley <agl@imperialviolet.org> Tue, 30 April 2013 21:08 UTC
Return-Path: <alangley@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: tls@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: tls@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6270021F85C3 for <tls@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 30 Apr 2013 14:08:14 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.977
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.977 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, FM_FORGED_GMAIL=0.622, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-1]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id eMEvf6rIupIJ for <tls@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 30 Apr 2013 14:08:09 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-lb0-f174.google.com (mail-lb0-f174.google.com [209.85.217.174]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id CA04421F93C6 for <tls@ietf.org>; Tue, 30 Apr 2013 14:06:24 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-lb0-f174.google.com with SMTP id t11so939732lbd.5 for <tls@ietf.org>; Tue, 30 Apr 2013 14:05:38 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:x-received:sender:in-reply-to:references:date :x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type; bh=6kEV2NY0Teu47eOpzEKGjcf9qaqgnsZTfqrk+Dt0kKk=; b=1JSgx6rbPUk1f6T5p0SlpuIemVihks/skIW5Y9BiO/nbjqxAINydPH27nTKYvnbrbQ wiXOwRKXqYH4PgeduNZaarmqtWj8dGqiwp08aQ+/Q090tmo6IdPn5atoav1fmqtI3BPu YtSTb09mp/KNS1QcRIvXnfr7B7feVpslX/nHKmv1qg6+pAZXmtXvsHmx4zdmM26fkKYm 15tpaKxSbikMjPi4+tp/NadH5RMPXGUFhwlgPimaJ4FZgqas8V+g0xVYKpdDZFNPf42n yM8OHvJfzus/bBnsAxWpPnW0mbUC8asoQsf1YELNvhuJXDVwPQGLAHDIPReYCJtpCpHJ Kbkw==
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.112.155.202 with SMTP id vy10mr251754lbb.51.1367355938669; Tue, 30 Apr 2013 14:05:38 -0700 (PDT)
Sender: alangley@gmail.com
Received: by 10.112.201.133 with HTTP; Tue, 30 Apr 2013 14:05:38 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <51803144.5040206@KingsMountain.com>
References: <51803144.5040206@KingsMountain.com>
Date: Tue, 30 Apr 2013 17:05:38 -0400
X-Google-Sender-Auth: H5H3Afz0HDpe0ZDz4Z5qXUO7MEw
Message-ID: <CAMfhd9VBZSOGwgyoBCdb563uV1xf_bbZY_Z=kAxoFcTSSNM1yg@mail.gmail.com>
From: Adam Langley <agl@imperialviolet.org>
To: =JeffH <Jeff.Hodges@kingsmountain.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Cc: IETF TLS WG <tls@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [TLS] whither draft-agl-tls-nextprotoneg? EncryptedExtensions? (was: Update on Origin-Bound Certificates: Now called "Channel ID")
X-BeenThere: tls@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: "This is the mailing list for the Transport Layer Security working group of the IETF." <tls.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/tls>, <mailto:tls-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/tls>
List-Post: <mailto:tls@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tls-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tls>, <mailto:tls-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 30 Apr 2013 21:08:14 -0000
On Tue, Apr 30, 2013 at 5:01 PM, =JeffH <Jeff.Hodges@kingsmountain.com> wrote: > After perusing both draft-agl-tls-nextprotoneg and > draft-balfanz-tls-channelid, > I tend to agree with PaulH that EncryptedExtensions ought to be a > stand-alone spec that is referenced by TLS extension specs as needed. I think the feeling at Orlando was that people didn't want to do EncryptedExtensions. Rather they wanted something more general. -- Adam Langley agl@imperialviolet.org http://www.imperialviolet.org