Re: [TLS] whither draft-agl-tls-nextprotoneg? EncryptedExtensions? (was: Update on Origin-Bound Certificates: Now called "Channel ID")
=JeffH <Jeff.Hodges@KingsMountain.com> Tue, 30 April 2013 21:29 UTC
Return-Path: <Jeff.Hodges@KingsMountain.com>
X-Original-To: tls@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: tls@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A9B3F21F9AF1 for <tls@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 30 Apr 2013 14:29:45 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -101.646
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-101.646 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, IP_NOT_FRIENDLY=0.334, RCVD_IN_SORBS_WEB=0.619, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id UerLdtTzxFHj for <tls@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 30 Apr 2013 14:29:40 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from oproxy13-pub.unifiedlayer.com (oproxy13-pub.unifiedlayer.com [69.89.16.30]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with SMTP id 2318E21F9AD3 for <tls@ietf.org>; Tue, 30 Apr 2013 14:29:21 -0700 (PDT)
Received: (qmail 30425 invoked by uid 0); 30 Apr 2013 21:28:12 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO box514.bluehost.com) (74.220.219.114) by oproxy13.unifiedlayer.com with SMTP; 30 Apr 2013 21:28:12 -0000
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=kingsmountain.com; s=default; h=Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Type:Subject:CC:To:MIME-Version:From:Date:Message-ID; bh=RDpQFY9JLJgMkgt0CCfhPkEZ6F9uVBX4nDQfzOnUgVo=; b=GVCFWFxydixxpmN3amIhDAD6UsblnEichfmdqdbKGj9aUeGqx9tkae//mBLMcsIJvoT4rgMAKv2H15ZEvxqzijlrfKz590z11XTNK3u44Y70SEO2qo7KalwB7qTBILxQ;
Received: from [216.113.168.128] (port=45560 helo=[10.244.137.220]) by box514.bluehost.com with esmtpsa (TLSv1:CAMELLIA256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from <Jeff.Hodges@KingsMountain.com>) id 1UXI5r-0007jL-US; Tue, 30 Apr 2013 15:28:11 -0600
Message-ID: <5180376E.5010501@KingsMountain.com>
Date: Tue, 30 Apr 2013 14:28:14 -0700
From: =JeffH <Jeff.Hodges@KingsMountain.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130330 Thunderbird/17.0.5
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Adam Langley <agl@imperialviolet.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Identified-User: {11025:box514.bluehost.com:kingsmou:kingsmountain.com} {sentby:smtp auth 216.113.168.128 authed with jeff.hodges+kingsmountain.com}
Cc: IETF TLS WG <tls@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [TLS] whither draft-agl-tls-nextprotoneg? EncryptedExtensions? (was: Update on Origin-Bound Certificates: Now called "Channel ID")
X-BeenThere: tls@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: "This is the mailing list for the Transport Layer Security working group of the IETF." <tls.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/tls>, <mailto:tls-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/tls>
List-Post: <mailto:tls@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tls-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tls>, <mailto:tls-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 30 Apr 2013 21:29:45 -0000
AGL replied.. > On Tue, Apr 30, 2013 at 5:01 PM, =JeffH <Jeff.Hodges@kingsmountain.com> wrote: >> After perusing both draft-agl-tls-nextprotoneg and >> draft-balfanz-tls-channelid, >> I tend to agree with PaulH that EncryptedExtensions ought to be a >> stand-alone spec that is referenced by TLS extension specs as needed. > > I think the feeling at Orlando was that people didn't want to do > EncryptedExtensions. Rather they wanted something more general. hm, i had the impression during that discussion that the overall concern was with having (specifically) next-proto-negotiation in the clear, rather than objections to EncryptedExtensions per se. =JeffH