IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [TLS] Call for WG adoption of draft-shore-tls-dnssec-chain-extension

Russ Housley <housley@vigilsec.com> Mon, 25 April 2016 15:27 UTC

Return-Path: <housley@vigilsec.com>
X-Original-To: tls@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: tls@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1EB8D12D1AB for <tls@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 25 Apr 2016 08:27:49 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -101.9
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-101.9 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Q1rzrZLNXAuZ for <tls@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 25 Apr 2016 08:27:45 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from odin.smetech.net (x-bolt-wan.smeinc.net [209.135.219.146]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8768612D1B9 for <tls@ietf.org>; Mon, 25 Apr 2016 08:27:45 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from localhost (ronin.smetech.net [209.135.209.5]) by odin.smetech.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 52DFBF2402E for <tls@ietf.org>; Mon, 25 Apr 2016 11:27:45 -0400 (EDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at smetech.net
Received: from odin.smetech.net ([209.135.209.4]) by localhost (ronin.smeinc.net [209.135.209.5]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id wmM4Z-hdjvAq for <tls@ietf.org>; Mon, 25 Apr 2016 11:11:58 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from [192.168.2.100] (pool-108-51-128-219.washdc.fios.verizon.net [108.51.128.219]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by odin.smetech.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id EE550F2401F for <tls@ietf.org>; Mon, 25 Apr 2016 11:27:44 -0400 (EDT)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="windows-1252"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 7.3 \(1878.6\))
From: Russ Housley <housley@vigilsec.com>
In-Reply-To: <alpine.LRH.2.20.1604251118140.21643@ns0.nohats.ca>
Date: Mon, 25 Apr 2016 11:27:44 -0400
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <01290CDD-4DCB-4215-861F-B1CCCA79787C@vigilsec.com>
References: <A475030C-FEFD-4069-B540-495AC4C32352@sn3rd.com> <alpine.LRH.2.20.1604251118140.21643@ns0.nohats.ca>
To: IETF TLS <tls@ietf.org>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1878.6)
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/tls/Mg5gWbtuRsLFRS13XzphXNSp3sA>
Subject: Re: [TLS] Call for WG adoption of draft-shore-tls-dnssec-chain-extension
X-BeenThere: tls@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: "This is the mailing list for the Transport Layer Security working group of the IETF." <tls.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/tls>, <mailto:tls-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/tls/>
List-Post: <mailto:tls@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tls-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tls>, <mailto:tls-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 25 Apr 2016 15:27:49 -0000

On Apr 25, 2016, at 11:19 AM, Paul Wouters <paul@nohats.ca> wrote:

> On Mon, 25 Apr 2016, Sean Turner wrote:
> 
>> draft-shore-tls-dnssec-chain-extension was originally discussed at IETF 93 [0], and the authors have been biding their time while the WG thrashed out TLS1.3s' issues.  At IETF 95, they presented again [1], but this time the chairs took a sense of the room about whether the WG was in favor of adopting the draft.  According to the minutes, there were “crickets” against and “lots of noise” for adoption.  But, we need to take it to the list so please indicate whether you:
>> 
>> - Support adoption and are willing to review/comment on the draft by 201600429.  Note that the extensions is pretty straight forward, but the chairs still need people to comment on the draft as we’re processing it down the path.
> 
> I support and will review the document. I think it is a great idea that
> will help deploying DNSSEC and TLSA for browsers.

+1

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email