IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [TLS] Call for WG adoption of draft-shore-tls-dnssec-chain-extension

Sean Turner <sean@sn3rd.com> Mon, 25 April 2016 15:19 UTC

Return-Path: <sean@sn3rd.com>
X-Original-To: tls@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: tls@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 96F2212B03B for <tls@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 25 Apr 2016 08:19:19 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.701
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.701 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=sn3rd.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id MKa-UzJ5KEYm for <tls@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 25 Apr 2016 08:19:18 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-pa0-x232.google.com (mail-pa0-x232.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400e:c03::232]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 676F112B017 for <tls@ietf.org>; Mon, 25 Apr 2016 08:19:18 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-pa0-x232.google.com with SMTP id r5so59657999pag.1 for <tls@ietf.org>; Mon, 25 Apr 2016 08:19:18 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=sn3rd.com; s=google; h=mime-version:subject:from:in-reply-to:date :content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to; bh=SQn4XcO/KPQXvFe2Q48QgD/6HAiJWZ/3NLDKWHmAVUA=; b=SAKtJ3tu97S0dbdyRZyQPyzAAtS+TQK8oVNpocTciUaOftDjb04MZz/6E/8lk26EMR 0r0Lwgfs55/AA0Evb9K7Jufe04AYLRjNJGzKXXhyiLGnXgJhQDZS9T5VqetuXwuy8Apb UTLADIRY+se1XR+S8/Z4h+xTp8z71vIgjUD+Q=
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:subject:from:in-reply-to:date :content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to; bh=SQn4XcO/KPQXvFe2Q48QgD/6HAiJWZ/3NLDKWHmAVUA=; b=nFCRi5NHeNJqDyBnB6LQtUdMr6in0IXOKbd9s8Z545Kj8623seLksiePiDFUf4ADnD R+/H11W7uvmTE9qZT9tgzurUIpmbdHoCjZIRET1g34gHkDXUxeWCTuaKyRpxqA9h9VDH 6X3/wpfgGemgaoilL/OHxPBq5DNyuv03FypVNKCVNNlXlBV1/HuX/UN++VUXXTtsmqaX 8CIwdgIsKFY0tasdEYXbvSMypBdzSY4zZ1K2IRWJv8Q4CSsX7VfPQUIGtWkpP0JpkO1z pTlCuROmdk9rjtBtDyN6p5Vi6Rr7eYXrHtz7cIL13O/h+W/1Kou9b2X04fpeqJtRJyf0 4QFg==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOPr4FVszQ4trnYy5f2d8x1KIX+s+McCf4QPWwTAJ+VoXvn2MtZteOM31dR1yTd+tsDKlQ==
X-Received: by 10.66.156.232 with SMTP id wh8mr49559982pab.153.1461597558022; Mon, 25 Apr 2016 08:19:18 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [172.20.10.4] ([166.177.250.132]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id 80sm29588950pfx.68.2016.04.25.08.19.17 for <tls@ietf.org> (version=TLS1 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-SHA bits=128/128); Mon, 25 Apr 2016 08:19:17 -0700 (PDT)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 9.3 \(3124\))
From: Sean Turner <sean@sn3rd.com>
In-Reply-To: <A475030C-FEFD-4069-B540-495AC4C32352@sn3rd.com>
Date: Mon, 25 Apr 2016 08:19:20 -0700
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <BDE4776B-FDB5-4066-A9DE-FDE1BC8E5A3C@sn3rd.com>
References: <A475030C-FEFD-4069-B540-495AC4C32352@sn3rd.com>
To: tls <tls@ietf.org>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3124)
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/tls/zPzl16T18geC1xhdmt_SoXepJ9c>
Subject: Re: [TLS] Call for WG adoption of draft-shore-tls-dnssec-chain-extension
X-BeenThere: tls@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: "This is the mailing list for the Transport Layer Security working group of the IETF." <tls.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/tls>, <mailto:tls-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/tls/>
List-Post: <mailto:tls@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tls-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tls>, <mailto:tls-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 25 Apr 2016 15:19:19 -0000

I got the dates wrong.  They should both have been 20160510.

spt

> On Apr 25, 2016, at 08:12, Sean Turner <sean@sn3rd.com> wrote:
> 
> All,
> 
> draft-shore-tls-dnssec-chain-extension was originally discussed at IETF 93 [0], and the authors have been biding their time while the WG thrashed out TLS1.3s' issues.  At IETF 95, they presented again [1], but this time the chairs took a sense of the room about whether the WG was in favor of adopting the draft.  According to the minutes, there were “crickets” against and “lots of noise” for adoption.  But, we need to take it to the list so please indicate whether you:
> 
> - Support adoption and are willing to review/comment on the draft by 201600429.  Note that the extensions is pretty straight forward, but the chairs still need people to comment on the draft as we’re processing it down the path.
> 
> - Object to the adoption of this draft as a WG item, please respond to the list indicating why by 201600510.
> 
> Cheers,
> 
> J&S
> 
> [0] https://www.ietf.org/proceedings/93/slides/slides-93-tls-1.pdf
> [1] https://www.ietf.org/proceedings/95/slides/slides-95-tls-3.pdf

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email