IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [TLS] WG review of draft-ietf-tls-rfc4492bis

Benjamin Kaduk <bkaduk@akamai.com> Thu, 20 April 2017 21:41 UTC

Return-Path: <bkaduk@akamai.com>
X-Original-To: tls@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: tls@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2E49012E05D for <tls@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 20 Apr 2017 14:41:30 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -0.712
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.712 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, HTTPS_HTTP_MISMATCH=1.989, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=akamai.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id wZbo4gMZ3zme for <tls@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 20 Apr 2017 14:41:26 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from prod-mail-xrelay06.akamai.com (prod-mail-xrelay06.akamai.com [96.6.114.98]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id CB9DF129C68 for <tls@ietf.org>; Thu, 20 Apr 2017 14:41:26 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from prod-mail-xrelay06.akamai.com (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by postfix.imss70 (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5517C496C0A; Thu, 20 Apr 2017 21:41:26 +0000 (GMT)
Received: from prod-mail-relay09.akamai.com (prod-mail-relay09.akamai.com [172.27.22.68]) by prod-mail-xrelay06.akamai.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 35814496C03; Thu, 20 Apr 2017 21:41:26 +0000 (GMT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=akamai.com; s=a1; t=1492724486; bh=XjAdLgf5/tveCks13gaOk0BxSYPF39bHyx4ohiv32gM=; l=6092; h=To:References:Cc:From:Date:In-Reply-To:From; b=o6+CDwbYeqxKKmQILqsjYjq+Wibm1tJtHB+RnWHH/3UB9/1jaQRyl3IBe0FHvkS7U Ok9SvtPr7WZnTIagjTyHj9XB7FP0S2l1F/Dmaj3UClAX+M6pPMZGCtPwSvbJLrqmJV Tv01P64UirplECz9oUMgDyFr0o840o387IBWtE9o=
Received: from [172.19.17.86] (bos-lpczi.kendall.corp.akamai.com [172.19.17.86]) by prod-mail-relay09.akamai.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C28521E09A; Thu, 20 Apr 2017 21:41:25 +0000 (GMT)
To: Martin Thomson <martin.thomson@gmail.com>, Sean Turner <sean@sn3rd.com>
References: <F7262846-0E93-4780-B051-8DB1253ADCE5@sn3rd.com> <CABkgnnVV8j+-E4oN4OdXn9vC2p2yKSS-cg2NWZPd2A_xwf67rw@mail.gmail.com>
Cc: "<tls@ietf.org>" <tls@ietf.org>
From: Benjamin Kaduk <bkaduk@akamai.com>
Message-ID: <f7f1635f-4586-a751-de33-96f886ab5b5c@akamai.com>
Date: Thu, 20 Apr 2017 16:41:25 -0500
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.8.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <CABkgnnVV8j+-E4oN4OdXn9vC2p2yKSS-cg2NWZPd2A_xwf67rw@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="------------F01640D89D4CD3E61563657C"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/tls/NLJKofg1KX4vXaQo3CVLjHiHyc8>
Subject: Re: [TLS] WG review of draft-ietf-tls-rfc4492bis
X-BeenThere: tls@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: "This is the mailing list for the Transport Layer Security working group of the IETF." <tls.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/tls>, <mailto:tls-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/tls/>
List-Post: <mailto:tls@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tls-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tls>, <mailto:tls-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 20 Apr 2017 21:41:30 -0000

I also reviewed the changes and have no objections.

I will just note that leaving the 'implicit' value in the
PublicValueEncoding but then removing the select() block that used it in
ClientECDiffieHellmanPublic looks a little weird at first glance, but is
probably okay (since implicit was only used for the fixed_ECDH methods
that are removed by this document).

-Ben

On 04/13/2017 03:54 AM, Martin Thomson wrote:
> I have reviewed the changes. They look good.  I have some reservations
> about section 7 (implementation status) given that I expect it to date
> badly, but it isn't really doing any actual harm either.
>
> On 11 Apr. 2017 11:09 pm, "Sean Turner" <sean@sn3rd.com
> <mailto:sean@sn3rd.com>> wrote:
>
>     All,
>
>     draft-ietf-tls-rfc4492bis has been revised since it left the WG
>     and we agree with Yoav’s statement at the mic in Chicago that the
>     WG should review the changes before we ask Kathleen (our newly
>     appointed AD) to continue progressing the draft.  Please review
>     the differences from the -12 version that went through WGLC and
>     the latest version [0] and let us know by 20170426 whether there
>     is anything that would stop progression of the draft.
>
>     Thanks,
>
>     J&S
>
>     [0]
>     https://www.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url1=draft-ietf-tls-rfc4492bis-12&url2=draft-ietf-tls-rfc4492bis-16
>     <https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__www.ietf.org_rfcdiff-3Furl1-3Ddraft-2Dietf-2Dtls-2Drfc4492bis-2D12-26url2-3Ddraft-2Dietf-2Dtls-2Drfc4492bis-2D16&d=DwMFaQ&c=96ZbZZcaMF4w0F4jpN6LZg&r=sssDLkeEEBWNIXmTsdpw8TZ3tAJx-Job4p1unc7rOhM&m=j7NWbDnuLYFY4aLpEDDejngQYL6Fhh2HRdFyQpIaQ4E&s=HNgYXclC2RY5Gc5jxDQ1PYLCJLsAtGZkVHHHe_Dj3hM&e=>
>     _______________________________________________
>     TLS mailing list
>     TLS@ietf.org <mailto:TLS@ietf.org>
>     https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tls
>     <https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__www.ietf.org_mailman_listinfo_tls&d=DwMFaQ&c=96ZbZZcaMF4w0F4jpN6LZg&r=sssDLkeEEBWNIXmTsdpw8TZ3tAJx-Job4p1unc7rOhM&m=j7NWbDnuLYFY4aLpEDDejngQYL6Fhh2HRdFyQpIaQ4E&s=LlJZwWVMZqNnQqGvXusM8WqLEOO-A2uvb7ln-TwSTYk&e=>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> TLS mailing list
> TLS@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tls

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email