Re: [TLS] Meeting minuts posted

Peter Sylvester <Peter.Sylvester@edelweb.fr> writes:
>> My general practice is to post the minutes (that's been done)
>> and if people object to a decision that was made in the meeting,
>> then they can speak up at that point and we'll have a discussion.
>> I generally only explicitly ask for discussion on the list (as
>> with the TLS 1.2 issue) when the decision seems controversial.
>>
> This is the point. How do you measure this? The list is the audience.

I measure it by discussion on the list and the sense I get from
the meeting. Given that there were basically no comments on the
list on this topic I didn't feel a need to call it out explicitly.
Since you seem to have found it in the minutes just fine, I don't really
see a problem.

>> In this particular case, there hadn't been much interest on
>> the list and since there wasn't much interest in the meeting,
>> so I didn't think *not* taking this work on would be particularly
>> controversial. Do you want to argue that the group should work
>> on this?
>>
> Yes. Here some starter;

Wait. These are arguments about the material, not about whether
the WG should work on it. Do you have an argument for why this
should be worked on in the TLS WG? Do others agree?

-Ekr

_______________________________________________
TLS mailing list
TLS@lists.ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tls