Re: [TLS] I-D Action: draft-ietf-tls-pwd-04.txt

Cullen Jennings <fluffy@iii.ca> Tue, 01 April 2014 17:24 UTC

Return-Path: <fluffy@iii.ca>
X-Original-To: tls@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: tls@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9AF4C1A09C1 for <tls@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 1 Apr 2014 10:24:20 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.601
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.601 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 1tQHEw1SM3Xr for <tls@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 1 Apr 2014 10:24:17 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mxout-08.mxes.net (mxout-08.mxes.net [216.86.168.183]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2A7A41A09BD for <tls@ietf.org>; Tue, 1 Apr 2014 10:24:17 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [192.168.4.100] (unknown [128.107.239.235]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.mxes.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id B43D450A84; Tue, 1 Apr 2014 13:24:11 -0400 (EDT)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 7.2 \(1874\))
From: Cullen Jennings <fluffy@iii.ca>
In-Reply-To: <CACsn0cmRRygPPk8=iU536-TK9mDFVcMOrYw_1tNV3=LZ02_9Hw@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 01 Apr 2014 11:24:08 -0600
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <361499D3-CFC6-45CA-B8F8-03C835DF009E@iii.ca>
References: <20140328195334.19328.19928.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> <CACsn0c==pRzDKd7G=eAhds=o9qexqe9Jb3DgNC9gzh-6xaKcAQ@mail.gmail.com> <dd67ab76dee19a82a0dfcdaa6512b905.squirrel@www.trepanning.net> <CACsn0ckQiNODB9DLj5XpcQDH2ykfD76CoV11-R4JJL+1_Vogfw@mail.gmail.com> <f8dc8cec46f6126146a7afa2421e43de.squirrel@www.trepanning.net> <CACsn0cmRRygPPk8=iU536-TK9mDFVcMOrYw_1tNV3=LZ02_9Hw@mail.gmail.com>
To: Watson Ladd <watsonbladd@gmail.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1874)
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/tls/QHaldo_JwnSTlR54C6_0nDOQcSc
Cc: "tls@ietf.org" <tls@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [TLS] I-D Action: draft-ietf-tls-pwd-04.txt
X-BeenThere: tls@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: "This is the mailing list for the Transport Layer Security working group of the IETF." <tls.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/tls>, <mailto:tls-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/tls/>
List-Post: <mailto:tls@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tls-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tls>, <mailto:tls-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 01 Apr 2014 17:24:20 -0000

On Mar 28, 2014, at 7:40 PM, Watson Ladd <watsonbladd@gmail.com> wrote:

> Write one. It's your problem, not mine.

Given IETF is a volunteer organization, people that think we should have a draft on X generally need to get together and write a draft on X. Asking the people that are happy with draft Y to write on draft on X is unlikely to get it done.