Re: [TLS] draft-ietf-tls-exported-authenticator questions

Watson Ladd <watsonbladd@gmail.com> Sat, 22 July 2017 05:17 UTC

Return-Path: <watsonbladd@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: tls@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: tls@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id BEDFA129ACD for <tls@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 21 Jul 2017 22:17:10 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Ft1vvpJIxwOS for <tls@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 21 Jul 2017 22:17:09 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-pg0-x22e.google.com (mail-pg0-x22e.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400e:c05::22e]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 16C351294A2 for <tls@ietf.org>; Fri, 21 Jul 2017 22:17:09 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-pg0-x22e.google.com with SMTP id s4so36198025pgr.5 for <tls@ietf.org>; Fri, 21 Jul 2017 22:17:09 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=RTCCr7Om4mRsZKrFtcUDWx4jOMUYSvGnUjwfJnz/R4g=; b=XexCv3NN03A4PyTGnK1U5p6g2kaVsYvdpsuCxSUNuPEEtjElX2ZchbKq3ZElPeb0js cI+CCpeO16FfGLV0K6L11xBnzJ7pIqcyuqVts+aj7U5Lzx+86VUTYm8vfLNN4fPDvbsz uvIuP7gRfjzRCpB9kSgBMo7UKSnd2ZMcyegap+W9gCUwkgvmpkf4VhHHBmBKCBM4RuzY YUULCKH/DYhMYYktNjFcYHaNOTH7laMB/R7G+J6TkWLIQTbTRbce402bg5EliMAMO8X4 lyJak+ma8SrXDoWgs4cSwrlftYyKyeTzPjO/ynAUgVVwsXJSz+sto3ermYZQQhlHct1p AIpA==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=RTCCr7Om4mRsZKrFtcUDWx4jOMUYSvGnUjwfJnz/R4g=; b=cUD/rf72/iUGWeE0+0cRR1kywjLr9IEQjsf1Dv8iu8Mvot17/oy3moiScDb/7WpUyi JA0AzWRu5L1YGVwMEoonsOg682dfEm6OZ1tkVFt+b8N59hA86WANW18tuP2mZj2cDp4f sYjnbIbmOHBtFefV/xQTFb0ayqTN4ejrMCMDPUUop1WqQAOyvXjV4SpWws5sWYSw1QBF CgvxpihbFdQYqlOWjiBSN8Z9EzgtHtFdgULAwfYTpx//l2nLZEqRbTj3DQuQ+sxJZlNo UqStmNsKPm5wCQevhXtJv46JByjp57dtuciR5bOYaU29X8ShlverpRDWPhHHdhlXHSxn RK6A==
X-Gm-Message-State: AIVw1124XApX8xQHdNrZID0bKsgdEDyuZ4mtvCW8jyk6ochUpFd3OyDS alVMRLc1uEtyDydNQFTOj+zLCKmTCBfP
X-Received: by 10.99.142.73 with SMTP id k70mr9457826pge.86.1500700628720; Fri, 21 Jul 2017 22:17:08 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.100.187.77 with HTTP; Fri, 21 Jul 2017 22:17:08 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <bfe006b2-681c-e766-4df6-2adf503b4a73@akamai.com>
References: <D6717B12-60FE-4E08-812E-4C5FB1B908F6@sn3rd.com> <20170720070217.xvwmrd3ootvjr2fu@LK-Perkele-VII> <bfe006b2-681c-e766-4df6-2adf503b4a73@akamai.com>
From: Watson Ladd <watsonbladd@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 21 Jul 2017 22:17:08 -0700
Message-ID: <CACsn0c=LP33E+1B5ZhAFGMq7aSW=LjdTTmu0j8oekcrxkvYwuw@mail.gmail.com>
To: Benjamin Kaduk <bkaduk@akamai.com>
Cc: "tls@ietf.org" <tls@ietf.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/tls/SRVjaCf01xAW-PCiB12Q9UDb0z0>
Subject: Re: [TLS] draft-ietf-tls-exported-authenticator questions
X-BeenThere: tls@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: "This is the mailing list for the Transport Layer Security working group of the IETF." <tls.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/tls>, <mailto:tls-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/tls/>
List-Post: <mailto:tls@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tls-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tls>, <mailto:tls-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 22 Jul 2017 05:17:11 -0000

On Fri, Jul 21, 2017 at 12:55 PM, Benjamin Kaduk <bkaduk@akamai.com> wrote:
> Unrelated to Ilari's questions, I wonder if we want to say anything about
> certificate_request_context values being unique across both in-TLS
> post-handshake auth and exported authenticators.

This context is not a security sensitive thing: it is for disambiguation.
>
> -Ben
>
> _______________________________________________
> TLS mailing list
> TLS@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tls
>



-- 
"Man is born free, but everywhere he is in chains".
--Rousseau.