Re: [TLS] Obsolete SCSV!? (was Re: AD review of draft-ietf-tls-oldversions-deprecate-06)

Sean Turner <sean@sn3rd.com> Fri, 25 September 2020 17:57 UTC

Return-Path: <sean@sn3rd.com>
X-Original-To: tls@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: tls@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2297D3A13EA for <tls@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 25 Sep 2020 10:57:30 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.999
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.999 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, PLING_QUERY=0.1, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=sn3rd.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id WffXGdyZhyNx for <tls@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 25 Sep 2020 10:57:29 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-qk1-x734.google.com (mail-qk1-x734.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::734]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id EFED43A13EE for <tls@ietf.org>; Fri, 25 Sep 2020 10:57:28 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-qk1-x734.google.com with SMTP id c2so3625367qkf.10 for <tls@ietf.org>; Fri, 25 Sep 2020 10:57:28 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=sn3rd.com; s=google; h=mime-version:subject:from:in-reply-to:date:cc :content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to; bh=ljg/SNlhY/CvW/6ojMlTxMJy6j3i/wNDw3rxa6Yp2B8=; b=DA72xw3Bsb+bOGsP+6UJ7AzxStpJ9XTdlMN337uPWgDWt3Rsvf+qq8XcidEj3lZzIl JMGZnNY2UlggQnv2OPJeFK3qU4RgfrPaEMlw4RKHf2Gpu3NSgA6GHBKICXWRFWpVgyGC nYXGEIhNLginZ9qyZud330tTNYJ3prDOPHRHA=
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:subject:from:in-reply-to:date:cc :content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to; bh=ljg/SNlhY/CvW/6ojMlTxMJy6j3i/wNDw3rxa6Yp2B8=; b=K91Zf3jnPH0NoMk4Eydl6pdhUjZYICaPSBNfEjkkT+4Y5K34zm/0NGg4zihvSA/UsV DjtiVRDkq80KjMhmte+0YEcvO3Lw9Ll3BoJLub8h5KYgkyHsxFsnBFBfDKpTalTAYWwD cd2xXsYD6WBH6j67eZ0g1HbwZ1+op0GLSgmc8nBWXoD//7nWi4WPTrEt+UohzcUXVAzH ppOH2iJPHIZSmDsxc3Y4lOLgMgR6cjQQ0uxZtgKhG7Ubz9XNYrFwQjrMGe+ZNwVA6BR3 P8EbyCqu5U13tev6QypGteREv3nL/PmOmzlTuKHd5fVBLp8TzmU1JkIdM7kJx3Eo9L9x 2zYA==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM533OsajtCgaxeDjw/HqgB+eDCEZoZs0U55KwRwzNaWh4ELPpg2Wa kCnOv6q+y02tr2vH1UyvdYZn4qgsoSRk0w==
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJwmnImUjZR2hThjnj5c7LcOmZqmXuq1skHHCar5toLRGKhdJ5Vhs0kpJhKbOBfFP/3vNcumhw==
X-Received: by 2002:a37:a414:: with SMTP id n20mr1232603qke.332.1601056647297; Fri, 25 Sep 2020 10:57:27 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [192.168.1.152] (pool-108-31-39-252.washdc.fios.verizon.net. [108.31.39.252]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id e9sm2210444qkb.8.2020.09.25.10.57.25 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-ECDSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Fri, 25 Sep 2020 10:57:25 -0700 (PDT)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 13.4 \(3608.120.23.2.1\))
From: Sean Turner <sean@sn3rd.com>
In-Reply-To: <D5F46CA0-39A0-42B2-8E76-56C9B4235F85@akamai.com>
Date: Fri, 25 Sep 2020 13:57:24 -0400
Cc: "draft-ietf-tls-oldversions-deprecate.all@ietf.org" <draft-ietf-tls-oldversions-deprecate.all@ietf.org>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <0D702C0F-F41D-46E9-900D-7379FED815B3@sn3rd.com>
References: <20200726212223.GY41010@kduck.mit.edu> <CAHbuEH6YV5HyqEV7DbO=_-9yFEHTS3Q7nH_t=ap_xwzGK=vMWw@mail.gmail.com> <20200813175413.GY92412@kduck.mit.edu> <47A50677-E2CB-44F4-8683-2B99EA97875D@sn3rd.com> <CABcZeBMsgTLdB-XKMyjHZdbS0B_2mVLniEwZEBfhFrm_-9MMiA@mail.gmail.com> <D5F46CA0-39A0-42B2-8E76-56C9B4235F85@akamai.com>
To: TLS List <tls@ietf.org>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3608.120.23.2.1)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/tls/WZepuSrcpQcEx_KTB_hjik3e-tg>
Subject: Re: [TLS] Obsolete SCSV!? (was Re: AD review of draft-ietf-tls-oldversions-deprecate-06)
X-BeenThere: tls@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "This is the mailing list for the Transport Layer Security working group of the IETF." <tls.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/tls>, <mailto:tls-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/tls/>
List-Post: <mailto:tls@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tls-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tls>, <mailto:tls-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 25 Sep 2020 17:57:30 -0000


> On Sep 23, 2020, at 09:36, Salz, Rich <rsalz@akamai.com> wrote:
> 
> Not to bury the lead or anything, but posting detailed analysis at 5:43am?  We can guess that you’re not in a different timezone…
>  
> Sure, looks fine to me.

Okay so I’ll leave this sit until the middle of next week. But, unless I hear otherwise I will suggest that draft-ietf-tls-oldversions-deprecate be modified as I suggested.

spt